Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Apr 24, 2024 5:13 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:21 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
How many of them are there left? Can't be very many. I was surprised to see this one on the link that Martin posted to the Mustang thread on the other forum.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:05 am
Posts: 448
Location: Manchester, Michigan
Can you explain (for us uneducated) what this mod entailed?
Thanks,
Mark

_________________
Once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards... for there you have been and there you will long to return. Leonardo daVinci


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:40 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 2275
Location: Vancouver, BC
I will have to assume that the mod django speaking of is the piece added to the vertical stabilizer. It is a good question he is raising.

Cheers,

David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:11 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4663
Location: Cheshire, CT
The fillet was a piece added to the forward edge of the vertical fin that extened forward along the fuselage for a couple of feet. It was added after they determined the lateral stability would be better for the "D" models. The earlier, high back P-51's had more surface area to help with directional stability. Later some B's and C's had the fillet added. See pics of P-51B, "Impatient Virgin", on the Oshkosh thread for the images of the fillet added to that aircraft.
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:13 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
The dorsal fillet (you fill-ay a fish, you fillet an airplane) was added to correct a percieved tendency for the aircraft to 'fishtail' slightly at certain airspeeds after losing a considerable amount of wetted area when the fuselage went from B/C razorback to bubble canopy version is what I've read and heard over the years.
Don't know the truth of it but I think the D looks cleaner and more lethal without the fillet fairing-

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:14 pm
Posts: 297
Location: Saint Charles, MO
Where was that picture taken?

_________________
T-6F, N81857
warbirdridesusa@gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 237
The fillet was added, starting with D-10 (and subsequent K-5) as a production mod, while all the P-51D-5 and K-1 had the fillet retro fitted.

Many B/C's also received the fillet in the Sept-Nov 1944 period

If the photo shown is the correct serial number it was one of the first 100 D's (~) and showed up in MTO and ETO in May/June 1944.

as noted earlier, when the turtleback was removed for the D, the ship had a tendency to yaw >400 mph and particularly in high speed dive.

The condition persisted, somewhat alleviated, until the H tail came along.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:05 am
Posts: 448
Location: Manchester, Michigan
Thank you for the explanation guys.
I am know edumacated.

_________________
Once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards... for there you have been and there you will long to return. Leonardo daVinci


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:27 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4663
Location: Cheshire, CT
valdez25 wrote:
Where was that picture taken?


I would say the SAC Museum, since that is their B-17 in the background.
CORRECTION: Per Django's post: Hill AFB Musem not SAC.
I guess I'm getting confused as I get older! :lol:
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Last edited by Jerry O'Neill on Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:45 am
Posts: 511
I used to believe the above:

that the dorsal fin was added to the D model only, and it was because the fuselage was cut down. that's what all the books said.
However recent reading of some T.O.'s issued at the time show this may actually not be the case:

Several crash reports tell of P-51B's and C's crashing because the
horizontal stab was torn off during maneuvering. The report says:

"Unless a dorsal fin is installed on the P-51B, P-51C, and P-51D airplanes, a snap roll may result when attempting a slow roll. The horizontal stabilizer will not withstand the effects of a Snap Roll. To prevent recurrence the stabilizer should be reinforced in accordance with T.O. 01-60J-18 dated 8 April 1944 and a dorsal fin should be installed. Dorsal fin kits are being made available to overseas activities"

A previous entry for another crash:

Sections II and III of T.O. 01-60J-18 had not been accomplished. The
stabilizer was approximately 20 percent below the strength of a completely reinforced stabilizer. It is believed that this type of failure will be completely eliminated after compliance with T.O 01-60J-18 and the installation of a Dorsal Fin and reverse rudder post tab."

A Supplement to Basic Technical Order (From old Hap himself) says:

"1. Due to horizontal stabilizer failures which are believed to have
resulted form slow rolls, all P-51B, P-51C and P-51D airplanes will not perform slow rolls pending the installation of dorsal fin and rudder reverse trim tab, and compliance with T.O. No. 01-60J-18."

Part of this T.O. 01-60J-18, it seems, was to "...use 1/4" rivets rather than 3/16" to attach the elevator outboard and rudder upper hinge fittings,....to stabilizer ribs, providing additional shear strength....."

Also, I guess that drilling out the rivet holes to take the larger rivets
didn't weaken the riveted pieces any - they must have had enough meat left over.


Also you can see photos of P-51B's or C's with the dorsal fin:

http://www.mustangsmustangs.net/p-51...tary/eto/6.jpg


Last edited by Saville on Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:42 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
The plane is at Hill AFB in UT. I have been trying to find info on the airframe. Couldn't find it in the registry P-51 page, yet a search in google turned this up!

http://www.warbirdregistry.org/p51regis ... llafb.html

I have no idea how to navigate to that from the main P-51 page and the serial isn't listed there either. According to the listing, it is an assemblage of parts representing that serial number. I found the serial # at mustangsmustangs and did a search in google to find the Registry page.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ????
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:55 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11468
Location: Salem, Oregon
Nice looking a/c but to say it's marked like the one chesley Peterson flew would be a tad inaccurate :idea:

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:02 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
I think Up Upa Epops is a good restoration to illustrate the field mod, as to me at least, it looks like it was added on later with the different finishes on the skin.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 962
Location: my home planet is EARTH!
it was a non flier with missing pieces and I think the tail part you are talking about was off a T 6 to fill the hole...or so im told

_________________
EVERYTHING that CAN fly should be ALLOWED to FLY!
IWO JIMA'S best narative..."GOD ISN'T HERE"
http://www.amazon.com/God-Isnt-Here-Ame ... 0976154706


P: Noise coming from under instrument panel. Sounds like a midget pounding on something with a hammer.

S: Took hammer away from midget.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ????
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:10 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
Jack Cook wrote:
Nice looking a/c but to say it's marked like the one chesley Peterson flew would be a tad inaccurate :idea:


Haha, just a lil' bit... :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 124 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group