Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 8:48 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:37 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
When ATI air cargo retires it's last 4 DC8-63's to replace them with modified 757's there will only be 2 flying DC-8s in the U.S. Right now there are 36 total still operating world wide.
The '8' has soldiered on for 54 years, curiously enough all the ATI birds are still equipped with straight pipe JT-4's not CFM's (they came out of EMERY AIR FREIGHT bankruptcy). The two left flying in the U.S. will be one with NATIONAL and a very rare -72 with NASA (the - 72 was a -62 refitted with CFMs originally built in very tiny numbers for JAL and UAL for long thin routes like Chicago to Tokyo with extra tanks in the inboard leading edges and extra outboard tanks) I worked on a -72 that belonged to EVERGREEN. Being a flight engineer on an 8 instantly qualified you to engineer a steam locomotive. :roll:

I'll miss the 8's, until you figured out it really was designed to be worked on and quit fighting it, it would kick your butt all over the hanger, they were tougher than Martian Algebra and could really take a beating, they were tiring to fly being typically Douglas 'fly-by-wire ( thats 7 strands x 9 wraps). IF you tweeked ANY rigging the entire airplanes rigging had to be checked "blue dots and golden rivets' because it was all interconected via bridle cables in a Kharmalike design.

It's one of only three different commercial airliners to ever bust Mach, and the other two were supersonic airliners not a bulbous round nosed old trash hauler.

So long old friend! they could never wear you out so they had to push you out.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:38 am
Posts: 142
Location: Ferndale, WA
I've got two flights on one of these under my belt...

ATI on my way to Diego Garcia
ATI on my way home from Diego Garcia

Both were quite 'fun' and enjoyable.

_________________
StudeDave


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:10 am
Posts: 192
Location: Camdenton MO
RE: DC-8 Fly by wire. Twenty plus years ago a United Airlines management pilot told me that when he was set up to check out in the 8, he sent a note to a friend who was instructing on the 8 in the UAL training command, asking him to send him all he needed to get ready for the school. A few days later a heavy box arrived with two dumbbells in it and a note saying that getting your muscles in shape was the best practice and the rest would be easy!

Jack

_________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all, that counts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 6:46 pm
Posts: 110
Here's the National DC-8-71 taken at KYIP last summer.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:02 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
myteaquinn wrote:
Here's the National DC-8-71 taken at KYIP last summer.

Image

-71 or -73? Anyone know who the original operator was or current N#? looks like N 872***

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
The Inspector wrote:
-71 or -73? Anyone know who the original operator was or current N#? looks like N 872***
71F, New to United (N8069U -61) in 1969 converted -71 in 1983 then to Spook Air (aka Southern Air) N872SJ, LAN Chile, MAS Cargo and National. Re-registered N872CA 2011.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:32 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
The ex UAL 8's weren't very desirable in the after market because of a unique UAL design requirement, the waste basket baggage loading through the bottom of the aircraft instead of a conventional side installed cargo door for each pit. That's one reason why UPS passed on them when they came on the market, too slow to load/unload.
That is one pretty airplane :supz:

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:00 am
Posts: 20
Location: High lonesome of NE Oregon
Soft spot in my heart for Douglas Products in general..but I'm a bit prejudiced...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:49 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11281
I hope someone has the foresight and wherewithal to save some of these!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:10 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
EVERGREEN had Ship 1 @ Maranna for years but I believe it went to the beer can factory.

Boeing managed to scam the L.A. press on May 30, 1958. The 30th was the date of Ship 1's first flight, so every bit of the L.A.press and TV was gathered @ LGB to record for posterity the first flight I'm not 100% certain but I believe it was Tex who hatched a plan, an 'ordinary test flight' (if a bit early) of a 707 out of KBFI that just 'happened' to wind up in the area of Long Beach just about when the 8 was supposed to lift off. The 707 was set up on a buzz job altitude and throttles advanced so the JT-3D's were pouring out coal smoke, the press all started snapping pictures and grinding cameras as the airplane roared past and swooped into the heavens, then they started heading for their cars to meet press and programming deadlines. At the time with only the 707 flying and the DC-8 looking the same to the press people, I'll take that thunder of yours thanks................. :rofl: :rofl:

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:31 am
Posts: 161
So, everyone considers the DC-8 better then 707?

_________________
Do-17z fact and history site, setting it straight.
There is something deeply wrong with a society more offended by breasts than by entrails.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:01 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Flying Pencil wrote:
So, everyone considers the DC-8 better then 707?



Worked on both types and taught mechanics how to be Long Beach Cable Car operators, the 8 made more sense (except the fuel transfer system), was tougher than Martian Algebra, Consolidated Air Freight launched a 54F out of PDX with the MCD unlatched, the door flew up and open on rotation and they flew around for several minutes with it flapping up and down, the crew landed, the door was cycled, latched and the crew was told 'GITOUDDAHERE, you're 45 minutes late'.
I had a running joke with the 757 instructor he 'Red cable, Green cable' me 'My guys really have to know how to fly, not just type 90WPM on the FMC's'. Rigging was a beeyatch (still have my RAM rigging document, ya never know).
I 'got' the 757 guy one day, there was an awful hail storm in Dallas, one of our customers who flew both types had one of each on the ramp and they got nailed with bigger than golf ball sized hailstones. The DC-8 needed to replace one (1) trim tab and it went back to making money, the '57 needed temporary repairs to ferry it to KPAE (LOTS of 500 MPH metal tape) so it could be treated to a full spa day in the plastic control surfaces repair shop.
Things that helped kill off the 8 was the lack of teeny spares or people who could make them in small lots, DOUGLAS farmed out lots of DC-8 sub work to guys running small machine shops in their garage or basement making 'widgets' in the 50's. contract completed, no more work, guys died off and no one kept up a chain of folks who could do the jobs. The Brown stripe Guys got PMA to make critical parts like MLG 'porkchops' and other machined parts to keep their fleet running and to make some extra bucks off their competitors.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 10:39 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:11 pm
Posts: 1559
Location: Damascus, MD
How many 707s are still out there (KC-135s and the various military derivatives excluded)?

I guess the 707 versus DC-8 is similar to the C-46 versus C-47...which is going to be the last one that still is out there earning its keep?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:45 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
According to the GOOGLE machine a total of 2 in what could be considered scheduled airliner service, both in Iran, down from 10 back in 2011.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group