Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 9:47 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:15 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
The NTSB has announced a press conference for Thursday morning to shed some light on it's findings and recommendations, early reports seem to say they will find the batteries will be acceptable if better temperature controlling takes place and the batteries cases be built with separation walls between cells to keep a hot cell from provoking it's neighbor.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:12 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11282
I think that the charger has been suspected all along. Thermal control is critical with this kind of battery. I heard that they were looking into pressure relief plugs to help control thermal runaway. Just water cooler scuttlebut of course.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:14 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Boeing has been given clearance to start flight tests of the 787 for battery issues. The NTSB and FAA are allowing Boeing to fly provided the flights are over unpopulated areas ( the Pacific Ocean is less than 10 minutes West of KPAE. The batteries and their condition must be monitored at all times, the wiring closely inspected and only essential personnel will be permitted on at least the first several series of flights, with particular attention paid to cell #6 which seems to be the common problem inside the batteries involved. YUASA will change the methods and techniques used in making the batteries.
A 787 that was in Ft. Worth for painting was permitted to ferry fly back to KPAE and landed mid afternoon.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:11 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3402
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Sounds like they took Elon Musk's advice at least in part from the more technical details of what they're looking at doing in the long run. He said that the design had the cells to closely packed, and if the charging system or contactors (what I think may be the real source of the problem) aren't working perfectly, then there is insufficient protection from a cell having a thermal runaway.

I have no direct knowledge, but I suspect something was changed in the production contactors from the pre-production and prototype aircraft that is the source of the problem. There is no other reason that the NTSB team would be going to Germany with them when they went to do the tests at Siemens. While fixing that may remove the immediate problem, I think it showed Boeing there was too little thermal protection and it would've shown up eventually. It's better to fix it now when there are only 50 delivered instead of when there's 500.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:30 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Dreamliner ZA-05 departed KBFI and flew over the Columbia Plateau East of the Cascade Mountains in Central Washington for 2.5 hrs/1100 total air miles on Saturday (isn't much in the area except lots of now fallow corn and soybean fields and a very few tiny farm towns) and that leaves Moses Lake/Grant Co. and Fairchild AFB within range in case of a issue. The first step back-

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:09 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Japanese Transportation Dept. officials reported that the APU battery in the 787 grounded in Japan had been either installed incorrectly or wired wrong.
Meantime, Boeing has had sucess with a redesigned test battery with spaces between the cells to prevent cell to cell induction overheating.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:06 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11282
http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/2013 ... 3-7-13.pdf

FAA interim report on the 787 battery incident.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:48 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
The FAA has accepted Boeings plan for correcting the battery issues, now it's time to fly the wings off ZA-05 to see if it works.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:56 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11282
Quote:
Ray Conner, president and chief executive officer of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, described the company’s proposal.

“Working with internal and external experts in battery technology, we have proposed a comprehensive set of solutions designed to significantly minimize the potential for battery failure while ensuring that no battery event affects the continued safe operation of the airplane,” said Conner.

Boeing’s proposal includes three layers of improvements, Conner said.

“First, we’ve improved design features of the battery to prevent faults from occurring and isolating any that do,” he said. The new design adds thermal and electrical insulation materials and reflects other changes.
“Second, we’ve enhanced production, operating and testing processes to ensure the highest levels of quality and performance of the battery and its components.” Enhanced production and testing includes more stringent screening of battery cells prior to battery assembly. Operating improvements focus on tightening the system’s voltage range.
“Third, in the unlikely event of a battery failure, we’ve introduced a new enclosure system that will keep any level of battery overheating from affecting the airplane or being noticed by passengers,” Conner said. The enclosure is designed to ensure no fire can develop in the battery or in the enclosure.

Boeing said it will provide details of the new design in the days ahead.

http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=2619


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:24 pm
Posts: 877
http://news.yahoo.com/faa-approves-boei ... IAsJHQtDMD

_________________
" excuse me stewardess I speak jive"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
FAA may revoke ETOPS (temporarily?)
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...anyNews&rpc=43


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:19 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
WallyB wrote:

That makes zero sense, since ETOPS deals with the ability of the aircraft to reach a distant airport on one engine inoperative. The APU battery charging system is not in the loop.
Must be the clown college @ the Mike Baloney Center doing a major CYA.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 9:08 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3402
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Looks like Reuters took the article down.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
CAPFlyer wrote:
Looks like Reuters took the article down.
Moved it: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/ ... ews&rpc=43

Here's the article at http://australianaviation.com.au/2013/0 ... gs-report/ (fair use)
Quote:
FAA may clip 787′s wings — report

Item by australianaviation.com.au at 1:26 pm, Wednesday March 27 2013

Boeing is ramping up 787 production to 10 aircraft per month even as the jet remains grounded. (Boeing)

While Boeing says a test flight of its troubled 787 Dreamliner has gone according to script, the aircraft could face a new setback as the FAA reportedly mulls limiting the 787’s ETOPS limits.

A 787 took to the skies on Monday for the first time since the model was grounded in mid-January after batteries overheated on a pair of the jets. The two-hour flight, a first step in proving that Boeing has found a solution to those problems, went off without issue, Boeing said. A second test flight is scheduled for the coming days.

But while Boeing hopes to see the grounding lifted by May at the latest, the 787 may return to the skies with its wings clipped. According to Reuters, the FAA is considering temporary limits to the aircraft’s one-engine out ETOPS flying times.

The 787 had been approved for ETOPS flights up to three hours single-engine flying time away from an airport and Boeing has sought permission to extend that range to 5 1/2 hours, which would allow the 787 to fly over the North Pole. However, the FAA is now reportedly considering rolling back the 787’s ETOPS approval to two hours.

That would prove restrictive to current operators of the 50 787’s so far delivered, forcing them to take less direct routes on some long haul flights and likely pushing them to seek further compensation from Boeing. The grounding has already cost Boeing an estimated US$450 million.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:03 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Reports coming out of Japan today say the J.S. Yuasa lit/i batteries for a HONDA electric car model are overheating sooooo I still don't think it's the vehicle, it's poor engineering by the supplier. geek

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group