Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 12:29 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:16 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
A report on tonight's 10 P.M. news here in the Seattle area says Boeing has issued a service bulletin concerning a brief uncontrolled engine acceleration during climb out. 32 instances have been reported over the last 5 years where one or both CFM-56 engines on 737 next gen aircraft have had an up to 10 second acceleration during climb out. The engine surges to a higher power setting and returns to it's previous settings uncommanded.
The FADEC was upgraded in December fleet wide and no instances have been reported since, Boeing and carriers are looking @ things such as delivery and handling of JET 'A' and changing fuel controls after an incident, the VSV (variable stator vanes in the 4th to 10 stages of the low pressure compressor)control is also being looked into since it operates in conjunction with the thrust levers/fuel control.
So far, nothing coming from the FAA.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:21 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3399
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
I'm not sure that fuel quality has that much to do with it unless the screens aren't catching something that is causing the flowmeters to not read properly. The fuel system in the 737's is extremely robust and simple and the only real change between the Classic and NG tank systems are the length of the supply lines from the fuel tanks. I suspect it may be similar to the CFM issue that reared its head in the A32X series years ago and that it was a software issue more than anything.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:14 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
CAPFlyer wrote:
I'm not sure that fuel quality has that much to do with it unless the screens aren't catching something that is causing the flowmeters to not read properly. The fuel system in the 737's is extremely robust and simple and the only real change between the Classic and NG tank systems are the length of the supply lines from the fuel tanks. I suspect it may be similar to the CFM issue that reared its head in the A32X series years ago and that it was a software issue more than anything.

I would tend to agree, but I'm sure Boeing is like the AFLAC duck in the row boat, busy trying to cover every possible hole in the bottom given the issues still unsolved concerning the batteries in the 87. My opinion is 32 incidents divided by 5 years based on 16000 ops fleet wide per day makes odds pretty slim, but ALASKA AIR claims 16 of those incidents and 14 by 'another carrier' HMMMM-

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group