Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:00 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:48 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
UAL today bumped a confirmed, boarded passenger from a flight between Seattle and Honolulu because they 'needed to upload more fuel because of weather conditions'. (@ 180 lbs that's less than 20 gallons of jet A)

The individual inconvenienced happened to be a 90 year old Pearl Harbor survivor. But, UAL did spring into immediate action and booked him onto another flight departing 8 hours later, I want to fly with those pros! What a low rent, disgraceful, disrespectful thing to do! :angry: :bs: :butthead:

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 5:58 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3399
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Before throwing them under the bus, let's have the FULL STORY.

From - http://www.kpho.com/story/24143676/outr ... und-flight

1) There were 41 people bumped. Not 1.
2) They were flying a 737 (800 ETOPS or 900ER, doesn't specify)
3) This is *NOT* unusual to have to bump going to Hawaii from LA.

Why are we blaming the airline who picked by a number system that ignores who a person is (for obvious reasons) and uses fare class and other statistical data to pick who's removed, instead of the other 100+ people on the flight who WERE NOT BUMPED and yet chose not to take his place?

I'm sorry, I can't hold much of a fire under United for doing what is done every day on many flights. I hold accountable the ungrateful little people who stayed on the plane instead of giving up their seat for a WWII Vet, something I would've done in a heartbeat and have done before for less than a vet.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:43 am
Posts: 322
I blame an international carrier for using a regional jet for a Trans Pacific operation. The 737 is obviously just technically able to fly the route, otherwise they wouldn't have to bump 30% of the passengers from the airplane. It's as stupid as American replacing 767-200's LA to NY with A-320's. Yeah, that'll work :roll:
Chris...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group