Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:14 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:57 am
Posts: 5
gary1954 wrote:
Looks a little bizzar to me (as a Tanker) being pressed into a Tanker role out west, how did they perform? I have never seen an eggzample of this airframe type in Tanker service


There were only two AJ's operated as tankers in the early 60's. They took the jet out of the fuselage and replaced it with a 2000gal retardent tank. The plane was just a little under powered with the R-2800 engine that it had at the time. These were replaced with R-2800-CB-16's with water injection for take off. Much better performance. The visibility from the cockpit was one of the best in the tanker business.

I was sure sorry to see them go. They were really a neat aircraft.

Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Seattle, WA
When I got out of Uncle Sam's Canoe Club many moons ago I had kicked around applying to work at Aero Union, since I was still proficient in the Sky Pig.

So maybe a question for the guys that DO instead of those of us who just 'thought about doing it'.

IS there an ideal platform for fighting fires these days? Is the idea to dump as much as you can from a volume standpoint? Is the idea to be able to get as low and close to the drop area to be as accurate as possible? Is it an ability to go into the target slow, but have enough power to get yourself OUT of the situation once you're done? All of the above?

There's been a lot of approaches over the years and I suppose it depends on the size of the fire, whether you're trying to contain and control it or put it out. But they have everything from Turbo Thrush to Martin Mars, Bell 47 to the Erickson Skycrane, and even the DC-10 and 747 conversions.

Is there an ideal platform? Or is that making the same assumption that the Navy did by making the F/A-18 the 'all encompassing' fighter/bomber/jammer/attack/tanker at the expense of all the other diverse platforms?

_________________
Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives, and I decline......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:42 am
Posts: 61
Location: Arrow Rock, Idaho
I suppose the ideal platform depends on who you talk to. Realistically, the aircraft is just another tool in the box and seeing as how each fire is different with it's own set of dynamics, you use the proper tool...right?

SEAT's and S2's are great for some areas and terrain where getting something larger, like a P3 or a Neptune, are not only impractical, but dangerous. Terrain has a lot to do with how effective a certain tanker type will perform. Fire generates it's own weather, thus, thermals in certain areas will toss a smaller tanker quicker than a larger one. Wind speed, airspeed, and drop altitude all figure into this as well. Retardant coverage is another factor that is part of the equation. Fuel density on the ground requires different coverage levels, which brings us back the different aircraft being used. There was a time when either you dropped a half load or a full load. Nowdays, with the computer controlled system, that part of the game has changed.

Hopefully, Larry Kraus or Kenny Chapman will chime in for this subject, as both are current in the industry.

Tom :)

_________________
...not a complete idiot, some parts ARE missing!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:57 am
Posts: 5
Lt51506 wrote:
I suppose the ideal platform depends on who you talk to. Realistically, the aircraft is just another tool in the box and seeing as how each fire is different with it's own set of dynamics, you use the proper tool...right?


SEAT's and S2's are great for some areas and terrain where getting something larger, like a P3 or a Neptune, are not only impractical, but dangerous. Terrain has a lot to do with how effective a certain tanker type will perform. Fire generates it's own weather, thus, thermals in certain areas will toss a smaller tanker quicker than a larger one. Wind speed, airspeed, and drop altitude all figure into this as well. Retardant coverage is another factor that is part of the equation. Fuel density on the ground requires different coverage levels, which brings us back the different aircraft being used. There was a time when either you dropped a half load or a full load. Nowdays, with the computer controlled system, that part of the game has changed.

Hopefully, Larry Kraus or Kenny Chapman will chime in for this subject, as both are current in the industry.

Larry and Kenny can most certinelly fill you in on the different tools for the tool box. Kenny on helicopters, because he's flown them all, from the smallest to the biggest. Larry can fill you in on the tankers, as he currently fly's the DC-7. And as far as the 7 goes, as our old mentor, Don Ornbaum used to say, he can put that DC-7 anywhere you can put an S2. And he did.

Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:36 am 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3874
Location: DFW Texas
As for new tankers....there is this idea.

viewtopic.php?p=401572#p401572

BAe146-200 air tanker.

http://wildfiretoday.com/2010/05/26/a-n ... /#comments

http://missoulian.com/news/local/articl ... 002e0.html


Image
Photo by TOM BAUER/Missoulian

_________________
Zane Adams
There I was at 20,000 ft, upside down and out of ammunition.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Join us for the Texas Warbird Report on WarbirdRadio.com!
Image http://www.facebook.com/WarbirdRadio
Listen at http://www.warbirdradio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 2:46 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
Why weren't the KC-97's ever utilized as firebombers?

Certainly could carry more of a load than a PBY or '24 variant.

Because they were still being used in active duty?

Thanks!

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:13 pm
Posts: 16
Location: New Braunfels TX
UM, did you not see the picture of Tanker 84, ex KC-97G/L, 52-2698, was Hawkins and Powers fire bomber, used in AK, many times. The KC-97 fire tankers were the largest of the round engine tankers. :roll: :roll: Back up a page, and scroll down to that beautiful Lady.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:10 am
Posts: 192
Location: Camdenton MO
When I try to view many of the photos on this thread, all I get is a notice that bandwidth is exceeded and to get Photoshop Pro. Is this a problem on this thread or do I have a problem with my IE browser?

Any help would be appreciated.
Jack

_________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all, that counts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:56 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
that happens to me as well. Intermittently

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
Jack Frost wrote:
When I try to view many of the photos on this thread, all I get is a notice that bandwidth is exceeded and to get Photoshop Pro. Is this a problem on this thread or do I have a problem with my IE browser?

Any help would be appreciated.
Jack
Nothing to do with you Jack. The account on Photobucket which is hosting the photos has exceeded it's monthly access limit. The photos should magically reappear next month, ie. tomorrow :) .

It's the account owner who is being urged to upgrade ($$), not you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 5:16 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:46 pm
Posts: 1523
Location: Brenham, Texas
thanks for explaining the bandwidth issue before I stuck my foot in it showing my electronic ineptitude.
PB4Y-2 tanker C30 is the one at Lone Star.

_________________
"I love the smell of 100LL in the morning."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
Ztex wrote:
As for new tankers....there is this idea.

viewtopic.php?p=401572#p401572

BAe146-200 air tanker.
Seems to me USFS has decided never to use converted airliners again.

As I posted before they are unlikely to buy CL415s or Berievs (NIH ?) so it looks like SEATs and Bells from here on.
The existing type 4s will soldier on until they fall apart, hopefully NOT in the air, and they are just memories like the above.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 5:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:10 am
Posts: 192
Location: Camdenton MO
Thanks WallyB

_________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all, that counts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:01 pm
Posts: 260
...H&P's Tanker 84 was the second C-97 tanker...

...this was the first one...YC-97 45-59587 N9538C...seen at Chino 1962...

Image

Image


Last edited by sledge39 on Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Airtanker Memories
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:24 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Short tail and 'Gumps' neato!

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group