sdennison wrote:
Sorry Guys, this is a fake. It was made by Ralph Crandon's sewer buddy, Ed NORTON. Read the ad closer...the guy really knows what he has.
OK, I'll bite. So just how does this constitute a "fake?" It's a Norden sight. It's the sight head assembly - yeah - and it's Navy nomenclature. And it's Second War manufacture, and the Navy variant had no specific or unusual features than did the one that the AAF stuff that was humped in a B-29, the -17, -24, or -25 or several other mathematic numbers, so what's the point of contention with this piece for sale?
Where's the "fake," bro? D'ya mean he hasn't got one for sale and is shilling the public? Or you think it's not a correct piece because this one's made for the USN verus AAF?
If'n you want to crab and carry on that something's a "fake" - support your argument and your horse toothed statement. Me surmises - and that's just it - a guess - that you've found contention with the price and perhaps his reference to the "as used in bombers like the Enola Gay" text. Fact of the matter remains that there's nothing "off" with this satement. He might as well have stated "same type as in Lady Be Good B-24" and "almost-used-in-the-famous-B-25-raids-over-Tokyo-in-'42-but-the-brass-thought-better-of-putting-a-piece-of-classified-equipment-on-board for-fear-of-capture-and-didn't-do-it." Tryin' hard here to think of a Navy patrol bomber that has name recognition like that B-29 we can suggest he cite. Nah, still don't have one.
Get my drift, amigo?
Full disclosure - I have no dog in this hunt - don't know the seller, nor do I particularly care about the piece one way or another. One bit. I just get pee-oh'ed when someone wants to rail against a piece of hardware that someone has brought out to sell and has obviously preserved. He might as well scrap it, with the reception he's had from this lot. Maybe he'd get at least get a decent mixed metal rate from the boneyard goons versus the nut-kicking from the true experts and afficionados, eh?