Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Apr 17, 2024 10:39 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 4:52 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7557
Two P-51 Mustangs Collide During Duxford BofB show this past weekend. (non-fatal, both aircraft landed safely)

http://aerodynamicmedia.com/two-p-51-mu ... nce-video/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... 29tkXQOAq8

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Last edited by Mark Allen M on Thu Sep 28, 2017 8:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 11:38 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4613
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Ooooeee, that was a close one. Note the damage to the port stabilizer:
Image
:shock:

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:31 am
Posts: 609
Location: A pool in Palm Springs
Respectfully,

Statistically, It's somewhat of just you. I mean in my research I could show that London Heathrow has never had any warbird bumps and therefore has a 100 percent safe record of warbird air displays. It is also true that a Spitfore has never been wrecked by a civilian pilot in Afghanistan. Not helpful. But true.

Duxford is a hotbed of activity when it comes to vintage aircraft, and the place is bringing back many airframes from the dustbins of history. However the brilliant air displays seen there require a huge amount of trust, coordination and professionalism on the part of all participants. These are fighter aircraft, and are displayed ina way to be both beautiful and exciting. The risks and threats to these aircraft, spectators and crews are managed conscientiously by all involved. I would say that with that, the operations of 75 year old designs and equipment is not "factor free" when viewed as potential threats. Things may occasionally happen.

However, "this Mustang incident" is viewed, its important that pilots have both learned and taught each other (and me) another lesson in warbird operation. The damage can be repaired, and both Mustangs, impeccably maintained, brought their pilots home. That's a great end and a fortunate outcome to any incident. There is good luck involved here, not bad. Champion that fact.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 8:40 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7557
Title edited

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2017 4:46 am
Posts: 14
Looks like the Mustang with the damaged tail landed with partial flaps. Could be the pilot was concerned that with tail damage full flaps may block enough air flow to the tail to result in a tail stall. If so that is one smart pilot. Never saw a Mustang land with partial flaps before.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:31 am
Posts: 271
Location: Bay of Plenty, New Zealand
Quote:
I mean in my research I could show that London Heathrow has never had any warbird bumps and therefore has a 100 percent safe record of warbird air displays.


Definitely not a warbird display but didn't Heathrow have a warbird accident with a Vulcan in 1956?

Take your point though.

_________________
Little Johnny : "When I grow up I want to be a pilot!"

Johnny's Mother : "Don't be silly Dear - you can't do both!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:12 pm
Posts: 29
Location: UK
Technically, it was about a 3/4 mile short. :twisted:

http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1956/dec/20/vulcan-aircraft-crash-report


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 2:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 141
Location: Salisbury Plain England
Quote:
but didn't Heathrow have a warbird accident with a Vulcan in 1956?


Serving military aircraft, so not a warbird.
However, should we be worried that the pilots involved in these warbird (pilot error) incidents seem to be airline pilots more often than not.
(Lies, darn lies and statistics)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AG pilot, Google Adsense [Bot] and 67 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group