Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Nov 15, 2018 7:06 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Warbird Digest
Final Cut-The Post War B-17 Flying Fortress and Survivors - 5th Edition


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 2:26 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 5868
I'm sure the Canadian folks who know much more than I can state better facts, but my guess is these Canadian versions were equipped with Packard Merlin 28 power plants and Hamilton Standard propellers. From the photos below it certainly looks that the Ham Stand props were a bit too large for the typical Hawker Hurricane Spinner.

Below is a paragraph from a nice article from Vintage Wings of Canada.
http://www.vintagewings.ca/VintageNews/ ... Coast.aspx

"For most young testosterone-fueled, newly-winged pilots of the Second World War, being a fighter pilot was the plum assignment, the glory job, the best of the best - a fighting man with the fastest and the most exciting aircraft of the day. Being chosen to become a Hawker Hurricane pilot of the Royal Canadian Air Force would surely induce the highest excitement levels and the studliest demeanour in a young flyboy. It was a golden opportunity for which there was no downside... unless, of course, you were selected to be a fighter pilot in a Canadian home defence squadron, stationed thousands of miles from the nearest real action. Even the ferry pilots got closer to the action than some of Canada's home defenders. But be as it may, those who found themselves defending the empty skies of Western Canada, did so with panache and professionalism."

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
Photos taken down after a couple of weeks ...

Long time member of the “Exhausted Majority”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 2:49 pm 
Offline
Flight Sergeant

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 8:30 pm
Posts: 90
In a related question, did any Fairey Battles ever fly with spinners?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 5:10 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 1895
mexchiwa wrote:
In a related question, did any Fairey Battles ever fly with spinners?


Kind of sort of, but not your run of the mill production aircraft. :D This one fitted with a Fairey Monarch P-24 engine. 04-20-1942
https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJn ... narch.html

Image
Image

Also found this...http://www.airpics.net/photo/R3590-Fair ... ate/8606/L

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 7:24 pm 
Offline
Group Captain

Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:31 am
Posts: 398
Location: A pool in Palm Springs
And I think that K9370 is the only USAAF marked/operated Battle that Fairy ever made....not the stars under the wings, and the rudder flag stripes! Too cool! From wiki.....


“The engine was test flown in a Fairey Battle, serial K9370, with its first flight taking place on 30 June 1939.[4]

The engine was considered for use in the Hawker Tornado, and K9370 was later shipped to Wright Field in the US, where testing (Project MX-229)[5] was carried out in 1942 with a view to using the potentially 3,000 hp P.24 in the Republic P-47 Thunderbolt, a total of around 250 hours of test flying in the Battle being completed at Wright Field before the idea was abandoned. Following cancellation, the engine provided three trouble-free years of service in K9370”

An Engine is at Yeovilton on display. What happened to the plane and engine in the USA?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 12:00 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5043
Location: Minnesota, USA
Joe Scheil wrote:
...What happened to the plane and engine in the USA?



Ditto, Joe!

New bucket item: Discover at least one remaining bit of K9370


(And to think some believe the Brits never created an aesthetically-pleasing light bomber...)

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 12:33 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5043
Location: Minnesota, USA
Well, as an accomplice in the digression from Hurricanes, the least I can do is make it worth your while:




Image


Image


Image

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], kalamazookid and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group