Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:50 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Kawasaki P-2J Neptune...
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 5:51 am 
Offline
WRG Editor
WRG Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 5602
Location: Haverhill, MA & Johnston, RI
I learn something new everyday, I never knew there was a production Neptune variant with turboprops.

wikipedia wrote:
In Japan, the Neptune was license-built from 1966 by Kawasaki as the P-2J, with the piston engines replaced by IHI-built T64 turboprops. Kawasaki continued their manufacture much later than Lockheed did; the P-2J remained in service until 1984.


Image

I'm surprised these aren't used in fire fighting.

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.


Image

Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 6:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 7:03 am
Posts: 319
I like it when development continues under the licensee's hands. The F-104 also comes to mind. Off-subject but i've wondered why the USA doesn't buy a few of those ShinMaywa US-2's from Japan. Or make them under license. They seem very useful.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 6:59 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5228
Location: Eastern Washington
The turbine Neptunes are really old news....they were retired years ago in favor of Orions.
I always thought they'd be good fire bombers since they're already turbine and are comparatively young compared to the last USN models.

No need to make US2s here, the few that someone would want in the US would hardly justify a license agreement. IIRC, they (or their ASW variants) were very expensive, due in part to small production runs spread out over a number of years. Again, they might be good fire bombers....

And since you brought up Mitsubishi F-104s, here's the ultimate bit of Japanese aviation license history....the MU-2 turboprop uses gear based on the F-104.

And about little known Japanese mods of U.S. designs, don't forget the T-34 military liaison variant with a boxy 4-seat cabin added. FLYING magazine called it "...a roundabout way to make an ugly Bonanza."

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:05 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1157
The Kawasaki version was perhaps the most elegant Neptune, but I was a bit surprised after a quick wiki review that the T-64's has less power than the radial 3350's.

Wiki lists the 3350's as having between 3200-3700 max HP depending on the version, while the T-64 turboprop is listed at 2,800HP.

Auxiliary jets were about the same thrust between the US and Japanese versions.

So the Neptune was never overpowered, so imagine the Japanese version needed the jets for takeoff even more at max weights. Likely more efficient at cruise (with jets off) however. I once spoke with a old Neptune pilot who reported a main engine loss was a very serious issue, especially when heavy obviously, implying it was a handfull/bootfull.

I wonder if the T-56 with @4,500HP from a C-130 could have been fitted to a Neptune? I recall reading years ago that one of the Neptune firebomber users dreamed of making the ultimate firebomber by putting a big pair of turboprops on a Neptune.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:59 pm
Posts: 817
Location: Redmond,Oregon
Arnold Kolb, the owner of Blackhills Aviation, told me in 1980 that he was trying to buy the Kawasaki P-2’s to covert into air tankers, but thought that there would be too many logistical issues. Blackhills morphed into Neptune Aviation after Arnold sold out.

There were also rumors at the time that various P-2 tanker operators were going to make their own P-2 turboprop conversions and get STCs for them. Besides Blackhills, I believe that Aero Union had some plans for a conversion at one time.

The Hawkins & Powers conversion plan is mentioned in our friend’s link below. Of course, H & P no longer exists, nor does Aero Union.

Anyway, here’s the link:

http://www.ruudleeuw.com/greybull-rp-may03.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Sopwith and 84 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group