Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Apr 16, 2024 7:30 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2018 1:25 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7555
Also a 24-C COMPRESSOR ENGINE INSTALLED ON A B-24

Image

Image

Image

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:05 am
Posts: 378
k5083 wrote:
Here is a 3-engine bomber, but it counts as a "one extra" test bed.

Of course there was also Canada's 5-engine B-47.

Image

August


I think you mean 7-engine B-47!

I was going to post this myself but you beat me to it.

and while it is still only 4 engines, I love the look of this test bed, and RCAF Mk-10 testing the Avro Canada Chinook, Canada's first jet engine.

Image

Sean


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 659
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
martin_sam_2000 wrote:
and while it is still only 4 engines, I love the look of this test bed, and RCAF Mk-10 testing the Avro Canada Chinook, Canada's first jet engine.

Image

Sean

The Lancaster in the photo is FM209, which was designated the Lancaster 10O, and was used for testing the Orenda. It was destroyed in a hangar fire at Malton in 1956.
FM205 was supposed to be used for testing the Chinook (designated Lancaster 10C) but it never flew with Chinooks installed.

:partyman:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 303
Postwar in Sweden, jet engines began to be developed. The leading manufacturer was STAL (Swedish Turbine AB Ljungström), which began to test its first engine - named ”Skuten” after a Swedish lake - in the middle of the forties. Skuten was fitted with an axial compressor and had a thrust of 1.500 kp. The next project was the ”Dovern”, which in the variant ”Dovern II” got the Air Force designation RM 4 (RM = Reaktionsmotor). This engine had a thrust of 3.300 kp and was intended for the SAAB 32 Lansen. The last Swedish design was the ”Glan” of 7.000 kp, developed together with Svenska Flygmotor AB (SFA), which still under the name Volvo Aero builds the engines for the Swedish combat aircraft under license. None of the Swedish developed jet engines came into production. In November 1952, the programme for the development of Swedish jet engines was cancelled for good. Instead, license-built British (and later American) engines were chosen for the SAAB fighters.

To test the Dovern engine, a Lancaster Mk I was acquired from Britain (ex RAF RA805) in 1950. The aircraft was modified by Avro at Hamble in the UK. A large pod was fitted under the fuselage to contain the jet engine. The underside of the fuselage was covered with stainless steel plating to resist the heat from the exhaust. For the same reason, the tailwheel was made retractable. A large control panel was installed in the W/O space.

The Lancaster got the designation Tp 80 and the SwAF/n 80001. In May 1951, the aircraft was delivered to Sweden. It was based at FC (Försökscentralen = the Test Establishment) at Malmen near Linköping. The first test with the RM 4 Dovern was executed in June 1951.

After the Dovern programme was cancelled, the Tp 80 was used for the development of afterburners for the licence-built British engines. The Lancaster was (naturally!) also used as a target aircraft.

Unfortunately, the Tp 80 crashed in 1956. Two of the crew managed to bale out, but the other two were killed.

Image
Image

_________________
When I was young "sex was safe & flying was dangerous".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2018 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:56 am
Posts: 242
Location: Southern Georgia
avenger2504 wrote:
Interesting to see the B17 that had the Typhoon turbo prop also had electric props on the Wright Cyclones.


I don't think you could get the Hamilton Std props to unfeather at altitude unless you had a way to heat the oil first. Oil doesn't flow too well at -20 :)

_________________
Best Regards;
Chuck Giese --- Volunteer helping to restore B-17G 44-85734 "Liberty Belle".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 12:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:02 pm
Posts: 285
Just makes me wonder how much faster they flew those test beds... a lot of extra power beyond standard to be sure. And they were testing after all. A B-17 or a Lancaster above 350mph?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 3:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:46 pm
Posts: 523
Mark Sampson wrote:
Just makes me wonder how much faster they flew those test beds... a lot of extra power beyond standard to be sure. And they were testing after all. A B-17 or a Lancaster above 350mph?


Still limited by the Vne...which does not change.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 7:56 am
Posts: 843
They were testing engines not airframes....


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group