Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:25 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:33 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5731
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
Something strange seems to be going on.

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:34 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5731
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
And what of the Swoose. When will restoration begin on this plane?

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:34 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5257
Location: Eastern Washington
Well, the fact sheet says the USAAF only used six...not exactly a major type.
IIRC, didn't they also have a Lysander at one time? I'm other words, they have done it before.

Don't get me wrong I like the type. But with a fairly rare, type, I would not mind it going to a private owner or collection where it could be better appreciated and not hung from the ceiling and lost among all the other star attractions of a larger museum like the NMUSAF.

They indicate it was flown to the Museum in 1989, so I'd guess it's potentially airworthy.

If it is not airworthy, perhaps some of its parts could be used to help repair the one damaged at Abbotsford last year, and then the rest of the airframe could be restored to static display condition.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:09 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1090
Location: Caribou, Maine
Quote:
IIRC, didn't they also have a Lysander at one time? I'm other words, they have done it before.


The Lysander was on loan from NASM, and is now at Udvar Hazy.

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 12:18 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1168
Location: Marietta, GA
The USAFM and the other big museums have a lot on their respective plates, not only restoring aircraft like the Swoose, but in maintaining and re-restoring the current display inventory. Without a major increase in funding, they probably cannot afford to keep the obscure examples in display condition. At that point, do you put them in a warehouse to rot, or do you allow them to move into private hands?

Me? I'm all for getting these airplanes into private hands if the they aren't a priority for the USAFM.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 12:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:55 pm
Posts: 491
Where/Who did the A-25 go ? pop2 OOPS ! Never mind, Found the thread ! :( Bummer !

_________________
WWI & WWII Warbird Fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:52 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3275
Location: Las Vegas, NV
This airframe wasn't even one of the airframes that the USAAF actually flew. Doesn't seem too controversial for them to want to trade it away for something more significant.

_________________
ellice_island_kid wrote:
I am only in my 20s but someday I will fly it at airshows. I am getting rich really fast writing software and so I can afford to do really stupid things like put all my money into warbirds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 10:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 9:45 pm
Posts: 226
The six aircraft that were flown, was the De Havilland DH-84 Dragon and not the DH-89 Dragon Rapide , same manufacturer but different aircraft. See ADF Serials, Series Two, they have pictures of these aircraft next to each other. I could of course be wrong as the Dragon Rapide was called Dominie in military service and U.S.A.A.F. used other nations aircraft when supply of a particular type was not available at that time, reverse lend lease or local initiative depending in what country they operated in. Just a reason of why they do not need this aircraft now


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:28 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2630
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Maybe it will return to the air in the near future. It probably has better engines and newer rebuilds than any of the DH 82A Tiger Moths I’ve looked at the last year or two.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:07 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1168
Location: Marietta, GA
marine air wrote:
Maybe it will return to the air in the near future. It probably has better engines and newer rebuilds than any of the DH 82A Tiger Moths I’ve looked at the last year or two.


If you're in the market, I know of one <Tiger Moth> in Calhoun, GA that is/was pretty nice when I flew it ~5 years ago. The owner has lost interest and is ready to sell.


Last edited by Kyleb on Thu Sep 12, 2019 7:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 12, 2019 5:31 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2630
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
I’ve talked to, emailed or went to look at every DH82A for sale in North America plus the one in Hawaii. I had wanted to buy two airplanes. The first one, a LAKE LA-4-200 was easy. The airplane had logbooks slightly better than he told me. The interior wasn’t mentioned as it was hard and stiff. We worked on it and now the leather is supple and looks new. The engine and prop were not only overhauled within the last 100 hours, but also in the 21st century. Electrical and other systems adequately updated for flying in this highly regulated 21st century. I brought my checkbook and wrote a check. It was easy.
I’ve spent a lot of time the last 18 months looking at tiger moths for myself and L-5’s , Fleets, C-170B’s, etc. for friends. Amazing how many planes are listed as “perfect condition, new this and that, ready to fly away” . In fact, they are out of annual, missing parts, need an engine or prop overhaul, or can’t be flown for whatever reason.
Lying to get someone to come look at your airplane is not the same as collecting a check and moving it on.



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:02 pm
Posts: 286
re the DH-89. As one Secretary of the Air Force said about the SR-71, "It doesn't carry gun, it doesn't drop a bomb, I don't want it."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 172 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group