Warbird Information Exchange

So, I have recently been buying a number of wartime vintage aircraft books as I wanted to better understand the prevailing attitudes at the time. One of the interesting details I have repeatedly come across is that the B-17 was not the first airplane to be called the "Flying Fortress". Here are a few examples that point to that:


(Source: “New Boeing ‘Death Angel’ to Be World’s Fastest Bomber,” Modern Mechanics, August 1931.)


(Source: John B. Walker, War Planes of All Nations (Racine, Wisconsin: Whitman Publishing Company, 1940), 50.)


(Source: Thomas Penfield, Wings for America (Chicago: Rand McNally & Company, 1943), 41.)

The first two sources use the term "Flying Fortress" to refer to non-B-17 models and the latter source specifically mentions that the B-17 is only the most recent incarnation to have the nickname applied to it. It is worth noting that all three aircraft were Boeing products.

To support this notion, it is worth noting that the most commonly encountered explanation for the B-17s nickname is somewhat muddled. There is some uncertainty over exactly when Mr. Richard L. Williams, the reporter credited with coining the nickname, first purportedly used the phrase “Flying Fortress”. It has been rather romantically suggested that it was an exclamation upon seeing the airplane for the first time. However, there is also evidence that the name may have only been attached to the plane later on in a caption back at the newspaper office. (I covered this aspect in more detail on a Wikipedia talk page.)

Finally, what is also revealing is when one realizes that the nickname was supposedly coined in regards to the prototype B-17, the Model 299. This prototype had significantly fewer guns than the configuration that most people would recognize as a Flying Fortress. This seems to point to the fact that the name referred to something other than the number of guns it carried. As a matter of fact, the Boeing B-9 mentioned in the first quote above actually had one less machine gun than its contemporaries built by Keystone. [ref]

It more likely referenced the idea that the plane served as an aerial version of the battleships of the U.S. Navy – a defender of American isolation. This argument is further reinforced by the interception of the Italian ocean liner SS Rex in 1938 by Y1B-17s. Also, recall that the Norden bombsight was developed by the Navy - and not the Army Air Corps.

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster

I have never even heard of that first one, the YB-9 so that is news to me, but the XB-15 was the precursor to the B-17 and was the begining of the "Flying Fortress" name.

Sean

One other point with the name Flying Fortress is Boeing holds the copyright on this name...

The other item of importance to note is the B-17 is a 4-engine medium bomber.....
.
.
.

Let's go way back to July 16, 1904 in the Marion, Ohio Star:

_________________

All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)

Trademark, not copyright.

The stories I always read says Boeing registered the trademark after the reporter called their aircraft a flying fortress. I have not been able to find a copy of the registration saying when that was. The stories always suggest it was early in the Model 299 period, but it's hard to be sure.

The British ordered the aircraft in 1940 and called it the Fortress (not Flying Fortress) but again, it's hard to pin down their first use of the term. Still, it seems fair to assume the B-17 was commonly known as the Flying Fortress by that time, and the British just used the last half of the name.

August

Here's another interesting excerpt from another book I recently picked up. The section on the B-17 mentions the XB-15 as the "Super Flying Fortress":

The nickname is mentioned again in a picture caption, so it's not a one-off:

I'm thinking the "Superfortress" nickname for the B-29 may have actually been a contraction of "Super Flying Fortress".

There's also this strange tidbit from the same section:

(Source: David C. Cooke, War Wings: Fighting Planes of the American and British Air Forces (New York: Robert M. McBride & Company, 1941), [unnumbered pages].)


Good find. It reminds me that the Sunderland was supposedly known to the Germans as the "Fliegendes Stachelschwein", or Flying Porcupine, due to all the guns it carried. (Although, I always thought it was appropriate for all the pointy antennas it had.)

(Source: Wikimedia Commons)


So, if the B-17 really was named for its defensive firepower, it by no means had a monopoly on the concept. It is worth noting that models

(Source: Luftwaffe Lovers)

and diagrams

(Source: Quora)

showing cones of fire, probably influenced the application of nicknames such as "Fliegendes Stachelschwein".

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster

So, I read further into the book above, and apparently they were just throwing that "Flying Fortress" nickname around everywhere:

Once again, the name is mentioned a second time in a picture caption:

(Source: David C. Cooke, War Wings: Fighting Planes of the American and British Air Forces (New York: Robert M. McBride & Company, 1941), [unnumbered pages].)

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster

Neat thread!

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.



Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ

and everybody knows the original name for the B-24 was Terminator

Had it remained the name it would have been pretty neat if one crew named theirs: "I'll be back"

Would not have been out of the realm of possibility...in fact it wouldn't surprise me if that name was used in WWII

Actually, I hadn't heard that before, so I had to look into it. A very brief Google search found me two references (1, 2) for the B-32 being originally named "Terminator", but nothing for the B-24. Do you have a source for that?

Also, as if to drive home how the "Flying Fortress" nickname was connected to isolationism rather than armament, I came across this picture caption:

(Source: David C. Cooke, War Wings: Fighting Planes of the American and British Air Forces (New York: Robert M. McBride & Company, 1941), n.p.)

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster

Al Blue in one of our many conversations told me about the B-24 being called the Terminator

Found a relevant excerpt from a 1941 letter to the editor:

(Source: “Give Them Names,” Hartford Courant, May 17, 1941, 8.)

Also, we have another contender for "Flying Fortress":

(Source: “Army Tests Huge Plane Called 'Flying Fortress',” North Adams Transcript, June 26, 1928, 7.)

Finally, the history of the B-17's nomenclature actually has a connection with another famously ambiguous nickname, "Jeep":

(Source: “Performances of B-17’s Evoke Enthusiasm,” Air Corps News Letter XXI, no. 1 (January 1, 1938), 7.)

EDIT: Found one more. Apparently even Fokker built a "Flying Fortress". Note the apparent comparison to a battleship at the end:

(Source: “Huge Army "Flying Fortress" Tested With Extreme Secrecy,” Spokane Daily Chronicle, April 14, 1931, 1.)

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster

So, I bought a few more vintage books over the holidays, and one of them - a children's book - definitely reinforces the connection with battleships. A few selections from the text:



(Source: James F. Wallace, War Planes in Action (Racine, Wisconsin: Whitman Publishing Company, 1942), [unnumbered pages].)

While none of the above refer to the B-17, the sheer number of times the metaphor is used demonstrate that the idea was deeply ingrained in the public consciousness. Furthermore, the following passage, while not mentioning the B-17 specifically, is a description of land-based "mediums" and "heavies":

(Source: James F. Wallace, War Planes in Action (Racine, Wisconsin: Whitman Publishing Company, 1942), [unnumbered pages].)

The fact that "ship" was already a common term for any type of airplane at the time would have only meant that the connection to vehicles of the water-based variety was that much easier to make.

Finally, just to further expand the preponderance of applications of the "Flying Fortress" moniker at the time, here's a caption from another book:

(Source: David C. Cooke, War Planes of the Axis (New York: Robert M. McBride & Company, 1942), 171.)

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster

Here's a specific answer to your question, and also adds to Noha307s original post.

Here is what Peter M. Bowers, Boeing engineer and unofficial historian says about that in his book
50th Anniversary Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, 1935-1985 published by the Museum of Flight.

"The name 'Flying Fortress' that was applied to the Boeing B-299 prototype was one of those rare naturals that just popped up. Boeing did not make a practice of naming it's airplanes at the time. When reporters at the July 17, 1935 roll out of the new bomber turned in their photos, an editor was impressed by the then formidable battery of 5 defensive machine guns and called the giant 'a 15 ton flying fortress' in the caption that he wrote. "

"Boeing public relations quickly picked up their name and registered as a trademark. However, its use was Unofficial for a few years. It did not become official with the US army until October 1941, when popular names assigned to U.S. service models for the general public reference without revealing the actual development status. All B-17's regardless of series letter we're simply 'Flying Fortresses' in military press releases."

Notice the unnamed editor used the term simply to describe the aircraft, not as a name or nickname.

The way Bowers wrote that make it clear (at least to me), that the editor likely used The name later that day or perhaps the next, depending on whether it was a morning or evening paper.
And for Boeing PR to be aware of the name, I'd also assume it was in a Seattle-area paper and not an editor in say, Chicago, who was going to print a news service photo.

The Museum of Flight library has all of Bowers' papers, I'm sure the exact date or more importantly, which newspaper that appeared in could be found with a bit of time in Seattle.

If one has access to online newspaper archieves, the two main Seattle papers of the time were The Seattle Times and The Seattle Post-Intelligencer.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.