Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 2:27 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2024 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:40 pm
Posts: 101
Location: Fort Worth, TX
https://abcnews.go.com/US/douglas-dc-4-plane-crashes-river-fairbanks-alaska/story?id=109546864

Details still emerging. Some sites say DC-4, some say C-54. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2024 5:28 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3402
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
They're the same thing (for all practical purposes). The aircraft in question is N3054V, a "C54D-DC".

https://www.reddit.com/r/flightradar24/ ... fairbanks/

Sadly, it sounds like the crew didn't make it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2024 7:56 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4700
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
Wow, this bird had some history according to Mike's Aerial Visuals. Former USAAF, RAF, USN, Aero Union...etc..
http://www.aerialvisuals.ca/AirframeDos ... rial=71867

There's some better days videos on Youtube under Alaska Flying:Douglas DC-4/C-54 in Palmer where it was based out of. Condolences to all the folks concerned.

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2024 7:56 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3275
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Image

_________________
ellice_island_kid wrote:
I am only in my 20s but someday I will fly it at airshows. I am getting rich really fast writing software and so I can afford to do really stupid things like put all my money into warbirds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:16 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5258
Location: Eastern Washington
Sorry to learn this. That aircraft was often photographed in its bicentennial colors...and later retro Douglas factory scheme. Condolences to the families and friends of the crew.

To elaborate on the DC-4/C-54 question:
I hope you find this as interesting as I do...

A lot of people don't realize that out of the 1244 DC-4/C-54 built by Douglas in the U.S....just 79 were civilian DC-4s.

Surplus C-54s were too much a bargain for airlines to pass up.
Postwar, the WAA sold C-54As @$75,000; C-54C/D @$90,000; and C-54E/G @ $100,000 whereas Douglas wanted $385,000 for a new DC-4-1009.
Unsurprisingly, airlines bought surplus machines.
They also offered a C-54 like freighter called the DC-4-1037. It did not make a single sale.

United cancelled its order for 1009s, bought surplus C-54s. It wasn't a total loss for Douglas, they ordered DC-6s at $595,000 each.
Douglas also did conversions of '54s to 4s.

Other C-54s remained government property and were leased to airlines. Some of those were recalled to active service during Korea.

Of the 79 civil ships, most went to foreign carriers.
American airlines which bough new DC-4s were National (7), Western (5), and Northwest (3) and Waterman (1...me neither).

I was a bit surprised to learn all this...you'd think there were more factory civil ships built.
So the take away is...when you see a DC-4, it more than likely began life as a C-54.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 24, 2024 5:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:01 pm
Posts: 107
Location: N Yorkshire
I won't link it but there's a clear video on You Tube from a security camera. Looks like the no.1 engine literally exploded on climb out, the 'plane then starts a bank to the left and descends in a dive to impact. No chance for the crew to recover. RIP.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 24, 2024 8:51 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:11 pm
Posts: 2663
Location: 16 mi. N of DFW Airport
Internet news report this morning said the plane was operated by Alaska Air Fuel. RIP to the crew. :(

_________________
Dean Hemphill, K5DH
Lake Dallas, Republic of Texas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 24, 2024 9:53 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 9:56 am
Posts: 1522
Location: Brush Prairie, WA, USA
The Army had 3 C-54s based on Kwaj in the early 70's, flown by civilian pilots wonder where they went.


Attachments:
C-54.jpg
C-54.jpg [ 369.19 KiB | Viewed 1274 times ]

_________________
GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 24, 2024 9:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 3:37 pm
Posts: 662
For those not wanting to watch, security video shows No 1. engine on fire and exploding followed by an immediate loss of control.

ATC communications are available, but I CAUTION that it is difficult to listen to.

_________________
"They done it, they done it, damned if they ain't flew." December 17, 1903


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 24, 2024 7:52 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:48 pm
Posts: 1660
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
DoraNineFan wrote:
ATC communications are available, but I CAUTION that it is difficult to listen to.

Having heard the recording myself, I want to second this sentiment. It is very hard to listen to. Consider this a warning.

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 24, 2024 9:18 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3402
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Juan Browne has put out a video that includes the security video. Massive failure of the #1 that leads to an uncontrolled left roll and nearly vertical impact. Very, very sad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asQhWTfoVf4


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 25, 2024 12:00 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1394
Stoney wrote:
The Army had 3 C-54s based on Kwaj in the early 70's, flown by civilian pilots wonder where they went.


C-118 rather than C-54.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 25, 2024 10:19 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 9:56 am
Posts: 1522
Location: Brush Prairie, WA, USA
You're right, i grabbed the wrong one from my collection. here's a Kwaj C-54.


Attachments:
image088.jpg
image088.jpg [ 114.98 KiB | Viewed 677 times ]

_________________
GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Last edited by Stoney on Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2024 1:58 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 1456
Maybe it's just my old eyes but it looks to me like the vertical fin fails and collapses as the aircraft rolls over.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2024 3:10 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3402
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
C VEICH wrote:
Maybe it's just my old eyes but it looks to me like the vertical fin fails and collapses as the aircraft rolls over.


It's possible, but there's a lot of loss of data due to the compression used for the security camera system unfortunately.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 350 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group