Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:40 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 6:22 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7566
"Operation Vengeance was the American military operation to kill Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto of the Imperial Japanese Navy on 18 April 1943 during the Solomon Islands campaign in the Pacific Theater of World War II. Yamamoto, commander of the Combined Fleet of the Imperial Japanese Navy, was killed near Bougainville Island when his transport aircraft was shot down by United States Army Air Forces fighter aircraft operating from Kukum Field on Guadalcanal.

The mission of the U.S. aircraft was specifically to kill Yamamoto, made possible because of United States Navy intelligence decoding transmissions about Yamamoto's travel itinerary through the Solomon Islands area. The death of Yamamoto reportedly damaged the morale of Japanese naval personnel, raised the morale of the Allied forces, and was intended as revenge by U.S. leaders, who blamed Yamamoto for the attack on Pearl Harbor that initiated the war between Imperial Japan and the United States.

The U.S. pilots claimed to have shot down three twin-engine bombers and two fighters during the mission, but Japanese records show only two bombers were shot down. There is a controversy over which pilot shot down Yamamoto's plane, but most modern historians credit Rex T. Barber."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Vengeance

Seems these photos below were taken this year or last year.
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064752997219

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 12:01 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1394
This is one case where an airframe really should be recovered and conserved before it goes forever. Not restored: conserved as-is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:16 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 2697
Location: NP, NJ, USA
quemerford wrote:
This is one case where an airframe really should be recovered and conserved before it goes forever. Not restored: conserved as-is.


I agree. It was fascinating leaving it in situ for so long, but it looks like its time to bring it indoors and conserve whats left.

_________________
Share your story: Rutgers Oral History Archive http://oralhistory.rutgers.edu/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 8:41 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4480
Location: Dallas, TX
Agreed, OR build something on top of the site... which of course has it's own risks.

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 4:33 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4311
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Besides being pilfered by souvenir hunters, I understand the wreckage has also been moved around a bit by logging crews over the years, so it's hardly a pristine site. I agree that what's left should be recovered and conserved. Of course, I'm sure the locals would like it to stay where it is, because it brings in tourist dollars. I certainly can't blame them.

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:48 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5258
Location: Eastern Washington
I have read somewhere that some of the more relevant wreckage was taken to a shrine or museum in Japan.
I would not have any problem with that if it is better protected.

Does anyone know more?

I recall seeing photos in (most likely) Air Classics many years ago, when interest in the site was relatively recent.
It would be interesting to compare, see how much has been removed or even if it is in the same place.

IIRC, the 1969 book Get Yamamoto seemed to create interest in the mission and the crash site.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 6:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 7:02 am
Posts: 316
Location: Up the Hill,Norwest from Brizzy
TAdan wrote:
quemerford wrote:
This is one case where an airframe really should be recovered and conserved before it goes forever. Not restored: conserved as-is.


I agree. It was fascinating leaving it in situ for so long, but it looks like its time to bring it indoors and conserve whats left.

Looking at the pics I can see its not far from rotting into the ground..Stabilize whats left and display inside.

_________________
If the CO ask,s you to be Tail End Charlie...Just Shoot Him..A Piece of Cake


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 328 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group