Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:22 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2021 7:23 pm 
Offline
KiwiZac
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:33 am
Posts: 1444
Location: Blenheim, NZ
I've found it interesting to follow this thread. Previously when we have a discussion about an incident or accident speculation is actively discouraged by most members, once or twice someone will say it's not our place and we should wait for the FAA/NTSB reports, one member is told their theory is garbage by someone with vastly more experience, and there's a kind of unspoken attitude that nothing ill is said of the crew involved for now.

Slightly different this time. Just an observation.

_________________
Zac in NZ
#avgeek, modelbuilder, photographer, writer. Callsign: "HANDBAG".
https://linktr.ee/zacyates

"It's his plane, he spent the money to restore it, he can do with it what he wants. I will never understand what's hard to comprehend about this." - kalamazookid, 20/08/2013
"The more time you spend around warbirds the sooner you learn nothing, is simple." - JohnB, 24/02/22


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2021 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:02 pm
Posts: 411
Location: Minden, NV
In the one video where he is rolling out of the parking lot on his takeoff run I don't see the palm fronds, trees or flags in front of the building moving. I doubt he had a sudden crosswind and he simply failed to maintain directional control. His speed suffered after getting in the grass and he pulled up and then pulled even more as he saw the wires with the traffic signal getting closer. A waste of a nice airplane.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2021 9:59 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1236
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
Well, I'm sure the guy feels like an idiot... but, that was a pretty idiotic stunt.

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2021 10:00 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4480
Location: Dallas, TX
BigGrey wrote:
In the one video where he is rolling out of the parking lot on his takeoff run I don't see the palm fronds, trees or flags in front of the building moving. I doubt he had a sudden crosswind and he simply failed to maintain directional control. His speed suffered after getting in the grass and he pulled up and then pulled even more as he saw the wires with the traffic signal getting closer. A waste of a nice airplane.

I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt since I wasn't there, but yeah, it looks bad.

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2021 10:02 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4480
Location: Dallas, TX
Kyleb wrote:
menards wrote:
Same thing with an airplane. Your track record is indicative of your inherent risk. Good track record in the air means you're relatively low risk and enjoy a relatively low premium. The opposite also applies. But the insurance company is gonna pay up when you prang the airplane, even if you make a dumb mistake (be it a physical mistake or a mental mistake).

More than that, even if they don't want to pay YOU, they will likely still be out money to settle with the city for the damage to the light poles and anyone else who's property was damaged. It's cheaper than going to court, and the city's lawyers will certainly go after the insurance company.

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2021 7:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:46 pm
Posts: 523
Kyleb wrote:
menards wrote:
There are “stupid mistakes” like forgetting to put the gear down and wrecking a nice Mooney. Then there are “stupid mistakes” like this one. Taking off from a street with tight margins and no room for error. It doesn’t seem fair to me that an insurance co would have to pay for a stearman, a light pole and some traffic signals. Also the recovery towing/ops.


Think about these examples:

Let's say you're driving under the influence and have an accident. Does your auto insurance pay?

Let's say you close the garage door on your new Porsche. Does your insurance pay to have the door and the Porsche fixed?

Let's say you screw up with one of those turkey fryers and burn your house to the ground. Does your homeowner's pay?

Let's say you chop your fingers off with your tablesaw. Does your medical insurance pay?

Same thing with an airplane. Your track record is indicative of your inherent risk. Good track record in the air means you're relatively low risk and enjoy a relatively low premium. The opposite also applies. But the insurance company is gonna pay up when you prang the airplane, even if you make a dumb mistake (be it a physical mistake or a mental mistake).


These examples of stupidity you provide are all well and good and akin to the example of landing your nice mooney and forgetting to put the gear down. There are also many examples where your insurance WONT pay. For example:

You take that nice shiny new Porshe out of the garage and drive it to the track because you want to see what it can do. You think your being responsible testing its limits off of public roads. You spin out and damage the Porshe. Insurance is NOT paying your claim. You're left with a wrecked Porshe.

As your house is ablaze due to your turkey fryer incident and all your neighbors are out at the curb watching your posessions burn, the neighbor you dont like asks "When is the turkey done?" You return with a slanderous remark. Your neighbor sues you for defamation. While your insurance company whill pay for your belongings, they are nowhere to be found on the defamation lawsuit. That said if you can prove that your remark to be true, its not slander, and the insurance company will defend you all the way.

There are many other exclusions baked into insurance policies. More and more of these accidents are seeming to be extremely preventable and nothing more than bad judgement. Maybe if insurance companies clamped down on owners/operators, they would have a little pause before they decided to take off on a public road with minimal (zero) safety margins. It baffles me to hear that aviation insurance is just quick to pay for the collossially stupid.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2021 12:28 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4480
Location: Dallas, TX
menards wrote:
There are many other exclusions baked into insurance policies. More and more of these accidents are seeming to be extremely preventable and nothing more than bad judgement. Maybe if insurance companies clamped down on owners/operators, they would have a little pause before they decided to take off on a public road with minimal (zero) safety margins. It baffles me to hear that aviation insurance is just quick to pay for the collossially stupid.

I don't think that's the insurance companies' fault, it is the fault of the judicial system, and ignorant jurors awarding money to people they shouldn't, creating a very hostile environment for insurance companies. What people forget is that all of that insurance money is invested for good in other places, most of the time, so other people also suffer when the insurance money has to take back their investments.

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2021 5:09 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:18 pm
Posts: 1937
Location: Meriden,Ct.
This story won't end...

https://aopalive.aopa.org/?utm_source=e ... dium=email

Phil

_________________
A man's got to know his limitations.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2021 9:34 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 4:50 pm
Posts: 1019
His dog still loves him so there is that.

_________________
Always looking for WW2 Half-Tracks and Parts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 10:03 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11281
First time I've seen the video clip where the Stearman went into the grass median/ditch. Despite that, it seems like the margins were pretty slim for that departure. The AOPA video says that the pilot claimed a "power loss" on the takeoff. Probably a good reason to have some extra margin. Always easy to criticize after the fact though. If the takeoff had gone to plan it wouldn't really be in the news.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2021 11:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:44 am
Posts: 838
Location: DAL glidepath
This guy does an interesting analysis where he gets down to brass tacks - take off space, overrun space, how far away was the nearest runway he could have been towed to for a proper take off, etc. We all know what opinions are worth, but clearly there was a series of faulty decisions made in this case:


[youtube]https://youtu.be/xBz83CJLVGs[/youtube]

*not sure why it won't imbed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2021 5:02 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4480
Location: Dallas, TX
StangStung wrote:
This guy does an interesting analysis where he gets down to brass tacks - take off space, overrun space, how far away was the nearest runway he could have been towed to for a proper take off, etc. We all know what opinions are worth, but clearly there was a series of faulty decisions made in this case:


[youtube]https://youtu.be/xBz83CJLVGs[/youtube]

*not sure why it won't imbed.

"This guy" is a member here.

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=11905

And yes, his stuff on YouTube is good.

Here's his channel for others: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLjbnp ... IEY5pWKBzw

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2021 9:06 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4700
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
StangStung wrote:
This guy does an interesting analysis where he gets down to brass tacks - take off space, overrun space, how far away was the nearest runway he could have been towed to for a proper take off, etc. We all know what opinions are worth, but clearly there was a series of faulty decisions made in this case:



https://youtube.com/watch?v=xBz83CJLVGs

Fixed it as a direct link.

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 4:23 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5257
Location: Eastern Washington
A lot better than many YouTube accident investigation videos.
The guy "gunnyperdue" seems to have experience in the type and he doesn't resort to name calling like some others who try to look smart or tough.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Rod Schneider and 303 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group