Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 10:56 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2022 10:54 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1378
Mick G wrote:
Just a thought, could it be cobbled together from various makes and models during wartime efforts perhaps for mail use to help keep the other aircraft on enemy lines


No. As has been said by others, doing so is not like combining parts of a plastic model kit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2022 11:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:39 pm
Posts: 211
Landing gear could have been added from another type. Lots of machinists were around in those days for field work and repair


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2022 11:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:39 pm
Posts: 211
Landing gear could have been added from another type. Lots of machinists were around in those days for field work and repair


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2022 11:47 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1378
Mick G wrote:
Landing gear could have been added from another type. Lots of machinists were around in those days for field work and repair


But why?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2022 3:49 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 1454
Just my .02 cents but something about the photo just says "model airplane" to me. Not a small plastic model (which probably did not exist at the time anyway) but a large model, possibly something built for a movie or some other purpose. Like something found in a Smilin' Jack comic turned into reality.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2022 7:22 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1168
Location: Marietta, GA
quemerford wrote:
Wheel spats too big and too far aft; subject has very pronounced 'knuckles' where the spats intersect the wing (akin to a P-40). The cockpit is further aft and the wings appear to have more dihedral.


The wings and landing gear smack of BT-13 to me. Yeah, a few details are different (like landing light placement), but this is (IMO) what you'd get if you put spats on a BT-13 and modified the fuselage (or put BT-13 wings on a custom fuse).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2022 9:47 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1168
Location: Marietta, GA
This is it...

https://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraf ... ft_id=1050

Maybe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2022 12:27 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5228
Location: Eastern Washington
Kyleb wrote:
quemerford wrote:
Wheel spats too big and too far aft; subject has very pronounced 'knuckles' where the spats intersect the wing (akin to a P-40). The cockpit is further aft and the wings appear to have more dihedral.


The wings and landing gear smack of BT-13 to me. Yeah, a few details are different (like landing light placement), but this is (IMO) what you'd get if you put spats on a BT-13 and modified the fuselage (or put BT-13 wings on a custom fuse).



Again, why?
Seems like a lot of work for a then cheap and common type.
Unless it was a Hollywood prop...but then they would have used a model...And if type was a "big" enough picture with the budget to do that, someone here would have seen it.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2022 3:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 278
Location: Perth Western Australia
Massive and extended discussion on FlyPast with offerings of planes that I had never even heard of thrown around like confetti, plus all the more obvious types that maybe somehow made it to Spain. The suggestion was that the photo was from the Spanish Civil war.
It was a really interesting thread and I learned a lot but my recollection is that it remained unsolved.

_________________
Chris Mellor


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2022 8:48 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1378
JohnB wrote:
Kyleb wrote:
quemerford wrote:
Wheel spats too big and too far aft; subject has very pronounced 'knuckles' where the spats intersect the wing (akin to a P-40). The cockpit is further aft and the wings appear to have more dihedral.


The wings and landing gear smack of BT-13 to me. Yeah, a few details are different (like landing light placement), but this is (IMO) what you'd get if you put spats on a BT-13 and modified the fuselage (or put BT-13 wings on a custom fuse).



Again, why?
Seems like a lot of work for a then cheap and common type.
Unless it was a Hollywood prop...but then they would have used a model...And if type was a "big" enough picture with the budget to do that, someone here would have seen it.


I think this is why it has to be a prop or a model: so far all scenarios would need lots of money (apart from model or possibly movie prop) and so straight away the argument falls down since it would have generated publicity and been well-known. This is a really 'beefy' looking machine and suggestions like BT-13 just don't cut it. To get from a weenie like a BT-13 (all things comparative) to this bruiser (new fuselage, engine, wings and gear) would be beyond the realms of common sense. If there were such a thing, I'd suggest it's a lost Granville Brothers design, but since there aren't any gaps in that history it also doesn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2022 11:12 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4473
Location: Dallas, TX
Kyleb wrote:

Canopy is wrong, but I still think it's a Northrop of some sort.

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2022 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:22 pm
Posts: 109
Location: Spokane, WA
I've seen this one come and go several times on Facebook, here and flypast. Never come to a firm conclusion but the closest I've gotten is in the Lockheed family.

Lockheed Sirius: matches our subject aircraft well with the only problem being the landing gear. Attach points are further aft and the inboard bracing present on the Sirius isn't present in the subject airplane. Otherwise the canopy, cowling, wing profile, tail profile and tailwheel match well. Other discrepancy is that the subject airplane seems to be silver (assuming polished aluminum?) and the Sirius was an entirely wooden airplane.

Lockheed Altair: A later variant of the Sirius, typically with retractable landing gear. Early SN's did have fixed gear though - the same as the Sirius. The Altair typically had a metal fuselage which might help with the "polished aluminum" appearance of the subject airplane. Landing gear is still wrong though.


Attachments:
File comment: Lockheed Sirius
sirius.jpg

File comment: Lockheed Altair
altair.jpg


_________________
Ryan Pemberton
www.pembertonandsons.com
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2022 6:48 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2628
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
The landing gear are attached at the front of the wing with a bulbous fairing. The width also suggests Curtiss-Wright. Not a CW-22 Demon but the earlier fixed gear like a CW-18. The gear, wing, and cowling are close to a design by Curtiss-Wright. The Tailwheel design and placement of the landing lights in the wings are also clues.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2022 11:00 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4606
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Sure looks like a Gamma variant to me; two were sold to Japan as the Northrop BXN (couldn't find a photo); could this be one that was later modified in Japan? The landing gear looks like an improvement over the bulbous wheel pants of the other Gammas.

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2022 12:29 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5228
Location: Eastern Washington
marine air wrote:
The landing gear are attached at the front of the wing with a bulbous fairing. The width also suggests Curtiss-Wright. Not a CW-22 Demon but the earlier fixed gear like a CW-18. The gear, wing, and cowling are close to a design by Curtiss-Wright. The Tailwheel design and placement of the landing lights in the wings are also clues.


While I don't disagree that it looks like something CW could have built, it does not appear in Peter M. Bowers' Curtiss Aircraft book.

Nor does it appear in the Japanese aircraft Putnam book.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], warbird51 and 97 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group