Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 1:37 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:42 pm
Posts: 176
Location: Australia
quemerford wrote:
Further to the above, the 'error' note on the card refers to the movement of '9095 with the 97th to the UK in May 42; the move was made in July so that part now makes sense. The 'error' seems to stem from the 97th receiving Special Order No.67 on 10 May, which the Group historian described as, "The first lap of the flight echelon to the Theater of Operations". It was a premature statement, with most B-17s going instead to the Middletown Air Depot for repairs, new engines and armament upgrades. The first men of the ground echelon arrived in the UK on 9 June and the first aircraft on 6 July.

Regarding Baugher's entry, the 97th mission on 6 September 1942 was to the Potez factory at Meaulte and no aircraft were lost. The only casualty was the tail gunner in '9021 (Cpl Bungard), killed by enemy gunfire.


Thanks for your informative response. Here’s the card for 41-9097. Condemned in India in June 1943, and the written notation seems to match the hand that made the final entry on the 41-9095 card.

Image

By the way, what’s your interpretation of “Y-Y” on these cards?

_________________
www.B17BlackJack.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:49 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1394
I don't know for sure, but I assumed that Y - Y indicated a move from one theater to another. However I've never seen it explained fully.

Incidentally, though the 97th BGp record narrative states that no aircraft were lost on 6 September, the Group history also includes the attached combat loss information. All very confusing.


Attachments:
41-24445b.jpg
41-24445b.jpg [ 72.04 KiB | Viewed 168 times ]
41-24445a.jpg
41-24445a.jpg [ 98.06 KiB | Viewed 168 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 338 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group