Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 10:21 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: C54 Fleet up for grabs
PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2017 1:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:39 pm
Posts: 211
Anybody notice Buffalo Airways has listed their fleet of DC4/C54's on "trade a plane" website. They've been retired at Buffalo for about 2 years now, but will be interesting to see if anybody finds a use for them. Maybe a few will be picked up by museums, I can't imagine many applications left other than possibly Caribbean or Alaskan freighter / bulk fuel? Might be too expensive to get them operational and fly out of Hay River to even be worth it to anyone. One is in Florida which was formerly on standby for pollution control as an aerial sprayer, maybe it can be used for a few more years. Not many trained mechanics left to keep these running in a commercial operation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 12:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:26 pm
Posts: 235
Huge shame to see the end of these great planes. They sure lasted way longer than I thought they would. So what other countries are still using the old prop recip planes? They have to be ones that have a big supply of av gas.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 12:33 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5230
Location: Eastern Washington
I believe they scrapped a couple in the UK recently.

As far as maintenance, they're not much different to work on than a DC-3 or B-17.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 8:47 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3399
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
JohnB wrote:
I believe they scrapped a couple in the UK recently.

As far as maintenance, they're not much different to work on than a DC-3 or B-17.


Except they use the "oddball" R-2000, and I'm sure that's probably where the bigger issue comes in since the only other type to use the R2000 as production standard is the DHC-4 and only seen sparingly in other types (like the Super PBY and Super DC-3). Also, I think the airframes are getting short on time and with the continued problems with acquiring 100LL in the Northern Territories (which grounded the fleet twice in the last 5 years), I think they're just ready to be done with them. Maybe the BAHF guys will get one or at least parts of one to continue supporting their aircraft? Would be a good fit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:12 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 9:56 am
Posts: 1519
Location: Brush Prairie, WA, USA
why is the R-2000 a odd ball? having flown both the C-54 and DHC-4, i thought it was a pretty good engine. we got 1200 hours out of them before O/H.

_________________
GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:32 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1168
Location: Marietta, GA
Stoney wrote:
why is the R-2000 a odd ball? having flown both the C-54 and DHC-4, i thought it was a pretty good engine. we got 1200 hours out of them before O/H.


Think of all of the R-1820's built for DC-3's and B-17's, plus the ones in T-28's, Lodestars, Hudsons, Wildcats, Grumman E-1's and S-2's, and a bunch of other types. Some of those types were in serial production into the late '60's and in military service for another decade or more. Then, look at the R-2000, which basically went into DC-4's, C-54's, and Caribou. The production numbers are/were vastly different, meaning the parts supply and service network had a much longer tail for the 1820's.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:07 pm
Posts: 334
CAPFlyer wrote:

Except they use the "oddball" R-2000, and I'm sure that's probably where the bigger issue comes in since the only other type to use the R2000 as production standard is the DHC-4 and only seen sparingly in other types (like the Super PBY and Super DC-3).


For the Super PBY (sic), read R-2600.

_________________
David Legg
Editor, The Catalina News
The Catalina Society
Author: Consolidated PBY Catalina - The Peacetime Record


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 3:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:56 pm
Posts: 238
Location: Johannesburg South Africa
Luckily for me .. my home base airport, Rand Airport, Germiston (FAGM) South Africa, still has two DC-4's (ZS-AUB and ZS-BMH) that are operated commercially on passenger charters, another DC-4 (ZS-AUA) that is currently being returned to flight plus two static preserved DC-4's and a Carvair ... and yes .. two preserved static DC-6's .. 3 airworthy DC-3s plus 2 DC-3's stored for preservation


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 4:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:39 pm
Posts: 211
So what does that leave for active aircraft? 2 in South Africa, 1 (or 2?) in Palmer Alaska any others?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 4:22 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 9:56 am
Posts: 1519
Location: Brush Prairie, WA, USA
you are comparing Wrights (wrong engines) with P&W engines

_________________
GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:11 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:31 pm
Posts: 1651
Preserving or restoring a DC-4 won't happen in Canada. We can't even properly support a North Star project, which of course is much more Canadian in content.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:40 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1089
Location: Caribou, Maine
One should go to the NASM, which does not have a commercial aircraft with four props and a nose wheel.

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 11:00 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4607
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
DC-7 N836D would make a better candidate for the Smithsonian, with all the work that was put into it...

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 2:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:20 am
Posts: 681
Location: Belgium
Hello,

Bearcat SA wrote:
another DC-4 (ZS-AUA) that is currently being returned to flight plus

Is this the one bought by a Dutch Association with the plan to operated her from Netherlands ?

Regards

_________________
Sorry for my bad English:-(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:12 am
Posts: 296
Chris Brame wrote:
DC-7 N836D would make a better candidate for the Smithsonian, with all the work that was put into it...


This aircraft has an attractive, but fading from sitting outside without attention, Eastern Air Lines paint scheme. The interior is FAR from "restored". Aside from the couch at the aft bulkhead, the aircraft has NONE of it's original trappings. All of the seats are "modern" DC-9 seats. (Did Carlos and the guys that renovated her store the original interior??).

Beyond that is the fact that she has TWO bad engines...

She was essentially abandoned in place at the Carolinas Aviation Museum. A nice, unexpected "gift" for which the museum has repaid by doing absolutely ZERO cosmetic upkeep. Just washing the plane would do wonders...oh, there are no volunteers to do the job!

At least she wasn't turned into a freighter or tanker.

C2j


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aeronut and 98 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group