Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Apr 16, 2024 1:57 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:21 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3260
Location: Phoenix, Az
aerojock wrote:
I have often wondered about the sensations felt when flying this aircraft. Even a roll would seem weird. Since no one has flown own since the 1980s where would you get specialized training? I would think there are some very obvious differences between the F-82 and the P-51, the first being having to land and take off left or right of the center line, and forward view, since there are two engines to block your view.

Now I am not trying to come down on the pilot that was flying the CAF F-82 when it crashed, just the opposite. The pilot flying the CAF F-82 when it crashed was a very qualified P-51 pilot but even he had problems landing the aircraft. I would think that back when they were new I would expect that there was specialized training for the aircraft but I do not know that for a fact.


It is a multi engine plane, and on that type, you are almost never landing on center line, you are to the left or right depending on where you are sitting. A 747 pilot has no problem landing a plane when he is to the left of center and 3 stories up. You get your sight picture before you take off and that is what you look for when you land. Even if he lands with the centerline going down the left fuselage, who cares ? most runways are 100+ feet in width, 8ft to the left or right are not going to matter. As far as rolls, you fly the plane, it is not an issue, otherwise the Air Force would have prohibited acrobatics in the P/F-82s. They are not reinventing the wheel, it has all been done before.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:01 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5645
Location: Minnesota, USA
aerojock,

I'll just ditto on what Matt stated well and add a little more specific to the P-/F-82.

If you have not yet slaked your thirst for knowledge with the flight operating instructions, then I'd start there. Pages 26 and 27 include details on flight characteristics and prohibited maneuvers.

http://www.avialogs.com/viewer/avialogs ... hp?id=3802

Concerning your question on roll, I quote: "Rolling maneuvers feel quite natural, and there is no perceptible acceleration of the pilot or copilot about the centerline of the airplane during such maneuvers."

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 2:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:55 pm
Posts: 491
aerojock wrote:
I have often wondered about the sensations felt when flying this aircraft. Even a roll would seem weird. Since no one has flown own since the 1980s where would you get specialized training? I would think there are some very obvious differences between the F-82 and the P-51, the first being having to land and take off left or right of the center line, and forward view, since there are two engines to block your view.

Now I am not trying to come down on the pilot that was flying the CAF F-82 when it crashed, just the opposite. The pilot flying the CAF F-82 when it crashed was a very qualified P-51 pilot but even he had problems landing the aircraft. I would think that back when they were new I would expect that there was specialized training for the aircraft but I do not know that for a fact.

I was there when the CAF's went down, I Always heard that the Pilot said that "He fell asleep" ( :? :shock: )
What REALLY Got my Goat is that when they towed it back behind the hangers, I witness a Bunch of ******* ******* KNUCKLE HEADS take turns Standing from wing tip to wing tip LAUGHING ( :twisted: ) taking pic.s as they put their arms around each other AND where Laughing and rocking the Plane by hopping up and down on it ! :evil:
I KNOW that was a long time ago, people's ideas....Blah Blah Blah.. BUT Still..... Still to this day, I can not excuse it. Thanks EVERY One for letting me Vent, Just my 2 Million pennies..... pop2

_________________
WWI & WWII Warbird Fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 2:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 2:58 am
Posts: 148
Dan,

Thanks for the info, good to know. I wished I had a manual to some of these airplanes when I was younger growing up in Harlingen.

TBM Tony,

I was there too when it crashed landed. I heard he flared too high and it stalled. I also heard that the airspeed indicator was in MPH and not KIAS and that was also a factor. Once again all this is second or third hand info but I know some people that were in the office when he walked in afterwards.

I have seen people do some stupid stuff to planes at airshows and even worse cars at car shows, liked they owned it. They probably thought that since it was wrecked they could do what they wanted, since it would be repaired anyway. I guess we should be thankful they weren't stealing stuff from the plane. In my younger days I was guilty of touching some planes but I knew how not to hurt it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 5:46 pm
Posts: 457
Location: Texas
Was is scrapped or restored?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 8:16 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1168
Location: Marietta, GA
lucky52 wrote:
Was is scrapped or restored?


That was the one the USAF repossessed from the CAF. As the courts ruled, the USAF had loaned the CAF the airplane. When the CAF could no longer fly it (after the crash), they ultimately traded it to a third party for other airplane stuff. The USAF swooped in and reclaimed its loan of the aircraft.

There is plenty in the WIX archives on this if you're interested.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2018 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:21 pm
Posts: 538
Location: Madison, WI
ffuries wrote:
I've got to wonder how odd it is flying sitting that far left of the center line of the aircraft. Also whether ones senses are thrown off by this. Landing it must be a little weird also.

Does a pilot need to go through specialized training to fly this aircraft? Or is all that is required is to be checked out in a basic Mustang?

Yeah I know lots of questions that have probably been asked and answered at some point in the past.


Maybe the test pilot(s) should get a few hours in the "Yak-110":

Image

Just a thought.

_________________
Chris


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 11:21 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4699
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
aerojock wrote:
Dan,

Thanks for the info, good to know. I wished I had a manual to some of these airplanes when I was younger growing up in Harlingen.

TBM Tony,

I was there too when it crashed landed. I heard he flared too high and it stalled. I also heard that the airspeed indicator was in MPH and not KIAS and that was also a factor.

Airshow-itis or hurry-upitis, ultimately appears to be the cause for the crash, not sleep apnia, airspeed indicator issues, or various pilot failings. As told to me by the FAA guy there that week, and who filled out the FAA report. One of these days I'm going to order that report just to have it. Commonly folks dig up the NTSB report, but they came along later and weren't there that day. They had just got her flying, but the -82 had an issue they had been chasing all week with oil supply leakage to the right-side propeller. IIRC, Lefty was overseeing that project and was in the passenger seat when the shunt occurred. This continued right into airshow time, when just before flair on the last landing, the pilot, "Grinny" Messick, lost pitch due oil starvation on the right prop causing a stall to the right or an asymmetric thrust situation. By the photos, the right prop looks as if it has been feathered and the left prop appears in a "normal thrust mode". As I understand it, when the oil is absent to the prop, the blades are free to flop about. The props appear to have had minimal rotation when they struck the ground, as 3 of the left prop blades are bent back "normally" as carrying pitch but little energy with the tip of the 4th blade scuffed and a slight bend back. Remember the landing gear are collapsing somewhere here during the event. The right-side blades, are all bent perpendicular to a feathered appearing state...tho oddly with the tips pointing at each other on a couple pair appearing to have come down as so, (^). There is one photo prior to the crash of her sitting on the ramp with the spinner removed from the right-side with a large oil stain underneath.

When it gets too hot to work outside, I'll try to post a couple of photos.

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:59 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5645
Location: Minnesota, USA
My bad if this video's been posted already at WIX.

Tom Reilly tells a little more of the story:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQP0IHH3FTs

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 6:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 2:58 am
Posts: 148
airnutz wrote:
aerojock wrote:

IIRC, Lefty was overseeing that project and was in the passenger seat when the shunt occurred.


Are you saying Lefty was on board when it pranged?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 6:37 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:26 pm
Posts: 2002
Location: Creemore Ontario Canada
Dan,
Thanks for posting that terrific video.
Tom seems like such an amazing human being.
I've enjoyed every step of this project that he has been kind enough to share. Just fantastic.
I also support his decision to replace the wheels 100%. Very wise move.
I'm really enjoying the anticipation of the first flight. it's hard to describe. This must not be rushed.

I love how Tom talked about Walter and all of the unbelievable coincidences that have come in to place to bring this project to fruition.
It's a masterpiece.
My heartiest congratulations to Mr Reilly and his team. :drink3:

Andy Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 8:15 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4699
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
Yes Aerojock. Note other splotches of oil in the center where she was parked during an earlier repair attempts.
Image

Track marks where it skewed off to the right after contact..
Image


Image


Apologies if the photo posting doesn't work.

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 9:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 1:36 pm
Posts: 717
Thanks for the pictures, airnutz.

According to the official NTSB report on the CAF F-82 accident, the mishap PIC had a grand total of 2 hours of F-82 time, with a grand total of 10 hours of PIC time in all makes and models of aircraft.

Is this really correct? I have a hard time believing somebody with that serious lack of experience would be allowed to fly an extremely rare, one of a kind aircraft - even in the CAF - when "pay for play" was common there at that time.

If the NTSB report is accurate, was this the reason that Lefty was in the other cockpit - to check him out in the aircraft?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 10:06 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:30 pm
Posts: 1129
Nobody had more than a few hours in the P-82 at the time, including Lefty and the 10hrs total time is wrong. Even though the airplane was owned by the CAF for many years, it probably flew for less than 40 hours total. All that time was split up among 6 or 8 people that had flown it. It spent much of its time, prior to the crash, being worked on and waiting for money to do it. There were very few sponsors on the airplane and a couple of them moved their money over to other projects when progress was so slow.

Lefty was not in the airplane at the time of the accident. Ed Messick was in the left seat and Harry Tope was in the right one, on his first flight in the airplane but he was just along for the ride. They were doing some film work for the BBC. The airplane had a problem with the right prop regulator leaking. On Friday before the accident, Lefty Gardner and Bill Popejoy were flying and came back with the right prop feathered. On Saturday, the plane came back with the right prop feathered. At that point, it was grounded. The maintenance guys had a meeting with Lefty and after some other work, released the airplane to fly. Ed was given instructions by Herb Puckett to fly for no longer than 30 minutes so they could keep an eye on the prop.

I've got all the CAF's files on the P-82 somewhere. I'll try to dig it all out. I've got the witness statements, investigator reports, insurance paperwork and such, including the letter that Ed Messick sent to the CAF General Staff, promising to pay for the restoration. Yes, Ed did stall the airplane and yes there were two different calibrations on the airspeed indicators. Harry Tope later died in a P-51 crash and Ed Messick murdered his wife and then committed suicide in 2002.

_________________
Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:02 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5645
Location: Minnesota, USA
DH82EH wrote:
Dan,
Thanks for posting that terrific video...



You're always entirely welcome, Andy.

So, who here is close enough to Tom Reilly to help him pronounce a good German name like "Edgar Schmued". :lol:

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group