Switch to full style
This forum is for discussions pertaining to Air Racing and Aerobatics of NON-Warbird aircraft. In addition this is the place to discuss General Aviation aircraft topics and yes Michael, that includes flying Lawnmowers :)
Post a reply

Boeing in hot water?

Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:29 pm

Boeing in hot water with NLRB?
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-2 ... -says.html

IIRC? The union offered Boeing a ten year contract that would guarantee no strikes in that time, if Boeing would build the second line of 787's in Everett

http://www.iam751.org/

http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=1714

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Wed Apr 20, 2011 9:01 pm

I think that Boeing should just turn over all their assets to Airbus. It just isn't worth the hassle anymore to try to remain competetive. Imagine where the company would be if they let the union run the business!

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Wed Apr 20, 2011 9:27 pm

Imagine how it might be if the bean counters got their way! Boeing would save billions if the bean counters had their way and only made virtual aircraft........

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:30 pm

And BDK you should understand more than most what happens when the bean counters try to run the company, isn't that why the 'swoosh' on your badge goes the other way? there is huge resentment here in the Seattle/Everett area over what are referred to as S. outh C. arolina A. irplane B. uilderS and the way that Boeing went to a 'Right to Work' state where wages can be kept low, but the Head Shed is in Chicago so the big guys don't have to face those they are disrespecting every day.

And the bean counters are the primary reason why the 787 program is so hosed up, 'Boeing vision 2016' wants to have everything made elsewhere and final assembled @ Everett or East Mule Shoe and all Boeing would be responsable for would be placing a sticker on the door frame that would say 'completed by Boeing' which would require a total staffing of about 15 people to deal with the paperwork. So hows that outsourcing going on the '87?

"LADIES and GENTLEMEN, Children of all ages, In our magnificent center assembly bay, for your amusement and amazement, I give you one huge, multi multi Billion Dollar cluster F*#% with poorly done airplane parts, starring the poorly managed and mis-directed by those who have never built an airplane". "See the manager who was a FNG 10 months ago, the General Superintendent who rose from a level 'A' janitor to thrash around trying to run a line of aircraft manufacturing in only 5 years." "As an added bonus, tonight only, thousands of foreign made parts that aren't within two blocks of what the design of the part is supposed to be, done by people who really don't care because they've got a job for life in Elbonia".

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Thu Apr 21, 2011 7:50 am

GEEESH! :shock:

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Thu Apr 21, 2011 9:32 am

But Boeing is going green! Can't do that in Seattle unless you are referring to mold... :axe:

http://www.boeing.com/Features/2011/04/bca_787_south_carolina_energy_04_18_11.html

Al Gore would be pleased, except there are no carbon credits to be sold.

I'd also like to ask, what is the union afraid of? Competition? Shouldn't the skilled union workers be able to run circles around the unskilled NASCAR yahoos in South Carolina? Here's a chance for the union to prove their merit to the company (and the country).

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:28 am

A quote from long ago--'Pay peanuts, get monkeys'

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:38 am

I always heard it as

"Pay Monkeys. Get peanuts"! :wink:

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:55 pm

do monkeys even like peanuts?

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Thu Apr 21, 2011 5:23 pm

The Inspector wrote:A quote from long ago--'Pay peanuts, get monkeys'
Then the union should have nothing to worry about!

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Thu Apr 21, 2011 6:11 pm

No, I guess not, but I'd keep a running list of S.C. tail numbers and avoid those for a while. What do you suppose the real reason was behind ROCKWELL closing down the 112/114 production lines and leaving S.C.? The114 was an A.D. generating machine.

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Thu Apr 21, 2011 7:37 pm

I really don't understand all of this. :rolleyes:

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Thu Apr 21, 2011 7:58 pm

The Inspector wrote:No, I guess not, but I'd keep a running list of S.C. tail numbers and avoid those for a while. What do you suppose the real reason was behind ROCKWELL closing down the 112/114 production lines and leaving S.C.? The114 was an A.D. generating machine.


The Commander went away because it was an aerodynamically inefficient airplane and because the GA market isn't healthy enough to support the efficient aircraft, much less the inefficient ones. And AD's are generally design, not construction issues.

Do you have any data to support your apparent conviction that union built airplanes are better than non-union built airplanes?

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Thu Apr 21, 2011 10:08 pm

Interesting question! What commercial airliners (or large military transports) have been built with non-union labor?

And another question...

How long before "big labor" shuts down WIX because some here have seemingly disparaged their honor? :axe:

Re: Boeing in hot water?

Fri Apr 22, 2011 9:17 am

And what makes you think that the employees in SC will remain non-union? Just because it's a Right-To-Work state, doesn't mean you can't have unions within it, it just means that you don't have to be in the union to get employment at a location with a union group.

Funny thing is, with the way some unions are, they break the law themselves by retaliating against non-union employees in the right-to-work states. However, the company can't do much about it if the employee doesn't complain and the employees usually just leave or join the union, tying the hands of the company.
Post a reply