aseanaero wrote:
Hi all,
Out of interest ...
Whats the correct technique for an overhead break (buzz and break) when landing at an airfield ?
I have read different techniques ranging from 200 ft to 1,500 ft , some using no power after the break and others reducing power to a specified reduced power setting , all pulling 3g to 6g (depending on the aircraft) to get the aircraft back into the correct speed for flaps and gear.
Is it a circular manoeuvre or is there a downwind leg ?
I'm sure there are different techniques for F-16, F-18, P-51, T-6 etc and I'd be interested to hear about that.
What's "correct" is what best meets whatever your objectives are, and best fits within the circumstances you're flying in.
If you've got a ton of speed to lose, break lower so you've got room to pull up.
If you're working with a FAA controller who goes by his civilian guidance which inexplicably has you break at 1500 feet, you've got a problem.
If you're working within a certain training regimen, follow the procedures of that training regimen.
If you're a formation, everybody needs to be on the same page as far as timing, power settings, G amount, etc. to stay at a predictable spacing.
If you're a formation, everybody but the lead must fly a level downwind leg so as to get to the same descent point.
If your plane is slow and draggy, keep the G's low otherwise you'll end up practically over the runway on downwind.
If you're a single ship doing it to look cool, do whatever looks cool.