Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 3:02 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 5:54 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4669
Location: Cheshire, CT
I guess it was only a matter of time before the giant A380 Airbus whacked another aircraft.
Luckily there were no injuries but the video shows the A380 passing behind a Comair jet (looks like a CRJ or Canadair) and the left wing of the A380 smacks the vertical stab of the Comair violently spinning it about 75 degrees. Amazing video.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42548948/ns/travel-news/

I think some out there had predicted something like this would happen due to the size of the A380.
Lets hope it's the last.
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:40 am 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
Boy, you never see an airline ground crew scatter that fast unless the 'quittin' whistle blows!! :lol: :lol:

Sure does give rise to the airlines rule of 'please keep your seatbelt buckled until the aircraft has arrived at the gate'

That Comair was tossed like a rag doll!

Airport taxiing incursions are my worst fear and the area the gubmnt and the airlines are far behind on.

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:55 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Must have been caused by all that 'maintenance equipment' on the runway huh?

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:05 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
Jerry O'Neill wrote:
I think some out there had predicted something like this would happen due to the size of the A380.
Lets hope it's the last.
Jerry


How many airfields have enough clearance for this 'BEAST' to taxi around on?

Looks like massive JFK is now at the minimum limits.

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:22 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
JFK has specific taxi routes, but it is still the responsibility of the A380 crew to know how big their plane is and to not run into other aircraft with it. Considering that the Airbus was going a bit quick for being in near the terminal and in proximity of another aircraft, I think there's going to be some harsh words for the crew. No excuse for clipping another plane in nice weather like that.

BTW, doesn't the A380 have a tail camera that they're supposed to be using for just this kind of thing?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:33 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
Yah, she was certainly in a hurry!

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 4:14 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm
Posts: 2595
Location: Mississippi
can't eait for one of those things to crash with a full load of passengers. TV will be screaming that they are too big again :axe:

_________________
"I knew the jig was up when I saw the P-51D-20-NA Mustang blue-nosed bastards from Bodney, and by the way the blue was more of a royal blue than an indigo and the inner landing gear interiors were NOT green, over Berlin."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:39 pm
Posts: 359
Wonder what that felt like! I'm sure the CRJ crew was watching as anyone would be as that monster moved behind them. "Man that's gonna be close" followed by "ahhhhh" will prob be heard on their CVR!

_________________
Cessna 195


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:04 pm
Posts: 372
Location: Canada
FWIW, it is suspected elsewhere the video has been sped up. The rampie turns and runs too fast. Even if the A380 wasn't going as fast as shown there was a fair bit of damage done:
Image
Image
That won't buff out...

-Tim

_________________
Keep 'em Flying.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 6:33 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
From watching the tape it appears that the COMAIR crew may have contributed to the encounter by forgetting that the aft end of their very, very long aircraft was in the previous time zone and apparently didn't pull far enough ahead after crossing the intersection. :rolleyes: :oops:

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:39 pm
Posts: 359
Hold short means the nose holds short, and the ass can hang back UNLESS your hanging back over an active runway. Its totally the 380 pilots fault and maybe the controller as a contributing factor for not telling them to give way to the crj.

_________________
Cessna 195


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 10:48 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
I just watched a recreation of the accident on a computer generated program that ABC News did, and the COMAIR was cleared across the taxiway but stopped with the aft half hanging out past the double yellow lines into the edge of the crossing taxiway it had just been cleared across, while a pickup truck drove past it from right to left on a service road. The FAA requires 100 ft. taxiway width but gave JFK a waiver down to 75 feet in width. and it looks like the 380 didn't clear the COMAIR vertical by...oh........about 25 feet.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group