Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 2:34 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 11:56 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
It has been announced that the 'official' reason for the LOT 767-300 gear up landing a few weeks ago was due to a circuit breaker in the pulled out 'OFF' position (OFF does NOT mean 'On Full Force'). Granted, the P-11 panel over the flight crews heads is a forest of 3/8ths inch diameter 'all look alike' KLIXON circuit breakers. but when the gear didn't extend procedures in the QRH or on EICAS should have included 'check circuit breakers @ J 16 & J 17 for in/on'.
And how come the manual latch override switch wasn't pressed (it's right next to the gear extension lever on the panel in front of the first officer) to electomechanically unlock the gear and cause it to free fall into Down and Locked? 'Lucy...you got some 'splainin' to do'

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 3:57 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Waiting for the CVR transcripts. As it was an Accident due to the level of damage, they should be posting a full investigation in a few years once the litigation's over and people think it's been forgotten... :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2011 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:42 pm
Posts: 296
Location: Ball Ground, GA
The Inspector wrote:
It has been announced that the 'official' reason for the LOT 767-300 gear up landing a few weeks ago was due to a circuit breaker in the pulled out 'OFF' position (OFF does NOT mean 'On Full Force'). Granted, the P-11 panel over the flight crews heads is a forest of 3/8ths inch diameter 'all look alike' KLIXON circuit breakers. but when the gear didn't extend procedures in the QRH or on EICAS should have included 'check circuit breakers @ J 16 & J 17 for in/on'.
And how come the manual latch override switch wasn't pressed (it's right next to the gear extension lever on the panel in front of the first officer) to electomechanically unlock the gear and cause it to free fall into Down and Locked? 'Lucy...you got some 'splainin' to do'


Actually, it seems to be a bit more involved than this. According to reports, they lost fluid in the center hydraulic system (one of 3 systems on the plane) due to a line that blew shortly after takeoff. Loosing the center system has minimal impact on flight controls, but it is the system that normally operates the landing gear. In this situation, moving the gear lever will not extend the gear due to a total lack of hydraulic pressure. The procedure in this situation is to depress the "Alternate Gear" switch on the panel, which runs a dedicated electric pump that extends an actuator on each gear that physically shoves the uplock latches out of the way and allows the gear to free fall with the assistance of over-center springs to lock it down. The circuit breaker that was found pulled out is the one for the alternate gear pump, so the pump apparently never ran, which equals no gear extension. I do find it unusual that they never checked the breakers while they were flying around to burn off some fuel............

_________________
Rod Schneider
Ball Ground, Ga


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 9:41 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Like the title of the post states, the 'OFFICIAL REASON' for general consumption stuff, I've worked on and around plenty of 67's so I know them pretty intimately, and seen enough and been involved enough in the aftermaths over the decades to know the difference between what's put out for the great unwashed and what the real inside dope is.
I assumed the quotation marks around 'Official' in the title would be the tip off-

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
More from the Aviation Herald: http://www.avherald.com/h?article=4456bd6b/0005&opt=0


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 10:42 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Thanks to both of you- :wink:

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group