Hi Randy,
Valid views of course!
Randy Haskin wrote:
JDK wrote:
It's not 'another' B-24, it's the Lady be Good, the surviving centre of a truly tragic story.
In my opinion, honestly, that is just ONE tragic story among thousands and thousands of other tragic stories of bomber crews. It's certainly
interesting, but is that compelling enough?
Absolutely. I'd use the word 'haunting' because it is such an 'if only' for the public. One story can serve among many. Because their only raid was disaster, there's no element of triumphalism. Inspiring one opera, and two TV films, regularly re-visited in print, I reckon it's certainly 'above average' for interest.
Randy Haskin wrote:
I'm of the opinion that warbirds should fly. The more they fly, the more they are able to tell their story to successive generations and keep the memory alive.
Who says we haven't got both? We have 'Ol 927' and the Collings bird doing that job. IMHO, we need
both museums that hold, ideally in perpetuity, and flying memorial. Lancaster PA474 does a great job, but it's be foolish to swap it with 'G for George' or 'S for Sugar', IMHO. And we have both (not to mention the CWH machine as well as the other statics) and 'Just Jane'.
Randy Haskin wrote:
IMHO, Lady Be Good could tell her story much better on the warbird circuit in the free world than sitting in a compound in Libya.
No argument about the compound not being the ideal; but let's take a moment to note without having been moved there, it's probably not exist now. That said, I think there's a subtlety here - a 'living breathing flying' B-24 is impressively 'complete'. But this aircraft's reached the end of it's road - as a silent wreck it should give pause to the viewer and poignancy. It's not as if we don't have the thunder of
two B-24s flying in N America to bring out the stories and the memories.
We shall see what happens, but patience is going to be the virtue here.
Regards,