Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Mar 25, 2026 5:57 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 5:06 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Jack's awesome photos of the P-61 got me to thinking about the Black Widow. I know it was a fighter, but really it was primarily a night one. In light of that, it would seem to have no need to do any aerobatics or fighter type manuevers. From what I've read, it seems like most of the kills of the P-61 were accomplished at night time and from a fairly level attack position.

Some questions:

1) Was the P-61 fully aerobatic?

2) What was the G limitation of the airplane?

3) Did it ever achieve any air-to-air kills during daytime? If so, were any of them fighters?

4) Were there any cases of the P-61 getting into a "furball" of a high-G, turning dogfight with any enemy fighters?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 962
Location: my home planet is EARTH!
that thing...aw jeez

_________________
EVERYTHING that CAN fly should be ALLOWED to FLY!
IWO JIMA'S best narative..."GOD ISN'T HERE"
http://www.amazon.com/God-Isnt-Here-Ame ... 0976154706


P: Noise coming from under instrument panel. Sounds like a midget pounding on something with a hammer.

S: Took hammer away from midget.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 2:22 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
I believe there was one in the ETO that shot down 2 FW-190s in daylight. I don't remember the exact quote, but they were quite shocked to actually see the devastation of the 20mm hits on the aircraft.

IIRC, when the squadrons first got the P-61s, they were super cautious and flew them like a truck. One of the test pilots was touring a plane and giving demonstrations and generally scaring the crap out of the crews with what the plane could actually do... and I don't think anyone had anything bad to say about a P-61 after that.

I'll have to look in my book to see if they list any specs.

One of the greatest limitations of their operational use was spare parts. There was one squadron that had only a handful of planes operational because they couldn't get parts. All the daytime planes were deemed a higher need than any of the NFS.

Imagine what they could have accomplished with greater support and if they had become operational in May '44 when they arrived (I think) in the ETO vs their first combat flights in late June/early July '44.

I think the aircraft was capable of some of the highest kill ratios of the war, but the operational use and conditions/weather really hindered the potential.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:31 am
Posts: 309
Didn't the top turret give them a lot of problems with buffeting the tail at high speed which added to the limitations of the bird. a lot of pics show them without the top turret. :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:18 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3418
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
The aircraft without the top turret was more due to lack of turrets than any buffeting problems. The P-61 used the same turret as the B-29 and as a result of the B-29 having a higher priority, the P-61 suffered problems several times during production and many planes were built without the turrets. However, some were retrofitted with turrets as they became available for installation during depot-level maintenance. Most pilots loved having the turret even with its buffeting problems because the extra power of the 4 .50's and the ability to use them for ventral attacks (i.e. attacks from below) was a major plus.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ....well...
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 962
Location: my home planet is EARTH!
Malo83 wrote:
Didn't the top turret give them a lot of problems with buffeting the tail at high speed which added to the limitations of the bird. a lot of pics show them without the top turret. :?


the A model had buffet problems...the B model had no turret...the C model solved the buffet problems

_________________
EVERYTHING that CAN fly should be ALLOWED to FLY!
IWO JIMA'S best narative..."GOD ISN'T HERE"
http://www.amazon.com/God-Isnt-Here-Ame ... 0976154706


P: Noise coming from under instrument panel. Sounds like a midget pounding on something with a hammer.

S: Took hammer away from midget.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ????
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:06 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11475
Location: Salem, Oregon
Ichatted with a fellow from the 419th NFS a while back.
He said without the turret the a/c was very maneuverable.
Especially with the wing spoilers. One thing he didn't like was the
prop spinning right next to him. He said a belly landing or a gear failure would have sent chucks of prop blades through the cockpit :?

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:24 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:49 am
Posts: 1521
Location: Zurich & Zug / Switzerland
warbird1 wrote:

3) Did it ever achieve any air-to-air kills during daytime? If so, were any of them fighters?


as per Olynik's Victory List [ETO]:

21st October 1944, 1825 h; 1 FW-190; 2/Lt. William G. Adams, Jr. [radar operator]; 1/Lt. Theodore I. Jones [pilot]; 1/Lt. Philip M. Guba [observer]- P-61A 42-5564, 422nd NFS; location F-2865 N of Aachen, Germany

24th October 1944; 1818 h; 1 FW-190; Lt. Col. Oris B. Johnson [pilot]; Capt. James A. Montgomery [radar operator]- P-61A 42-5558, 422nd NFS; location K-8151 near Aachen, Germany

Martin

_________________
Flying is easy: just learn how to throw yourself at the ground and miss


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ?????
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:47 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11475
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
24th October 1944; 1818 h; 1 FW-190; Lt. Col. Oris B. Johnson [pilot];

Image
L/C O.B. Johnson CO 422nd NFS 1944

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:14 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
I recall an article from years ago (WINGS or AIRPOWER?)about the WIDOW and how the factory demo pilots would haul the throttle back on one engine and snap the yoke over and kick bottom rudder to demonstrate that A) you could turn hard into a dead engine and live, and B)the thing would about swap ends inside the paint, 'hows them eggs and bacon stayin' with ya sonny?' :shock:

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Larry Kraus and 91 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group