Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 5:18 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: MacDill AFB's KB-50
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 8:38 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Ser. No. 49-0389 back when she was in Dayton just prior to shipping out to MacDill AFB.


Image

Image

Image

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 9:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:51 pm
Posts: 448
Location: NW Florida
WOW, Thanks for posting I have admired this bird many times.

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:07 pm
Posts: 563
Location: Clear Lake City, Texas
What is the difference between a B29 and a B50?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:32 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
Larger engines
Redesigned engine nacelles and engine mounts
Enlarged vertical tail and rudder (to maintain adequate yaw control during engine-out conditions)
Reinforced wing structure (required due to increased engine mass, larger gyroscopic forces from larger propeller, greater fuel load, and revised landing gear loading)
Revised routing for engine gases (cooling, intake, exhaust and intercooler ducts; also oil lines)
Upgraded fire-control equipment (to control remote turrets)
Landing gear strengthening (takeoff weight increased from 133,500 lb/60,555 kg to 173,000 lb/78,471 kg)
Increased fuel capacity (this was largely addressed by adding underwing fuel tanks).
Revisions to flight control systems
Different alloy of aluminum

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 4:42 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2953
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
Isn't it suppose to be moved to Dover AFB?

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 5:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:01 pm
Posts: 744
That is the rumor I heard...

_________________
Kevin Kearney
Vice President
Berlin Airlift Historical Foundation


C-54D "Spirit of Freedom" 43-17228
C-97 "Angel of Deliverance" 52-2718 (painted as YC-97A 45-59595)
C-54E/R5D-4 "Spirit of Freedom" 44-9144 BuNo 90414 (wfu April/2020)
http://www.spiritoffreedom.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 5:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:07 pm
Posts: 563
Location: Clear Lake City, Texas
Matt Gunsch wrote:
Larger engines
Redesigned engine nacelles and engine mounts
Enlarged vertical tail and rudder (to maintain adequate yaw control during engine-out conditions)
Reinforced wing structure (required due to increased engine mass, larger gyroscopic forces from larger propeller, greater fuel load, and revised landing gear loading)
Revised routing for engine gases (cooling, intake, exhaust and intercooler ducts; also oil lines)
Upgraded fire-control equipment (to control remote turrets)
Landing gear strengthening (takeoff weight increased from 133,500 lb/60,555 kg to 173,000 lb/78,471 kg)
Increased fuel capacity (this was largely addressed by adding underwing fuel tanks).
Revisions to flight control systems
Different alloy of aluminum


Thanks for the info


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 8:19 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:39 pm
Posts: 1817
Location: Irving, Texas
scfan wrote:
What is the difference between a B29 and a B50?

The B-29 used 2024-T3 aluminum, while the B-50 and C-97 used 7075-T6 aluminum which is stronger. The wings and landing gear were also interchangable with the C-97A.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 2:41 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:38 am
Posts: 1425
Location: LONE JACK Mo.
I might have passed on some bad info....I stand to be corrected...what engines did the B-29 and the B-50 use?
G


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 2:50 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
GARY HILTON wrote:
I might have passed on some bad info....I stand to be corrected...what engines did the B-29 and the B-50 use?
G


The B-29 used the Wright R-3350
the B-50 used the Pratt & Whitney R-4360

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 2:58 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
The McDill B-50 is indeed headed to Dover, and may already be there.

Cheers,
Richard

_________________
Richard Mallory Allnutt - Photography - http://www.rmallnutt.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 3:39 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:38 am
Posts: 1425
Location: LONE JACK Mo.
Thanks for the correction....shoot, I was only off a few numbers!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 4:43 pm 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3875
Location: DFW Texas
Matt Gunsch wrote:
Larger engines
Redesigned engine nacelles and engine mounts
Enlarged vertical tail and rudder (to maintain adequate yaw control during engine-out conditions)
Reinforced wing structure (required due to increased engine mass, larger gyroscopic forces from larger propeller, greater fuel load, and revised landing gear loading)
Revised routing for engine gases (cooling, intake, exhaust and intercooler ducts; also oil lines)
Upgraded fire-control equipment (to control remote turrets)
Landing gear strengthening (takeoff weight increased from 133,500 lb/60,555 kg to 173,000 lb/78,471 kg)
Increased fuel capacity (this was largely addressed by adding underwing fuel tanks).
Revisions to flight control systems
Different alloy of aluminum


And new funky bombardier's glass nose...

_________________
Zane Adams
There I was at 20,000 ft, upside down and out of ammunition.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Join us for the Texas Warbird Report on WarbirdRadio.com!
Image http://www.facebook.com/WarbirdRadio
Listen at http://www.warbirdradio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 6:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:18 pm
Posts: 187
The B-50 also had nose wheel steering added.

I'm heading for Dover in the morning for the NASCAR races. We will be staying on the base and will check to see if the B-50 is there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 11:05 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4702
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
As in the current "last operational USAF B-29 flight" thread, when was the last operational B-50 flight?

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group