Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jul 05, 2025 11:06 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:39 pm
Posts: 764
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Greetings all,

Well, to be honest this question has been rattling around in my head for quite some time. So I thought I would bring it to the resident authorities on the subjects of Warbirds here <grin>.

I have noticed that on such aircraft types such as the TBM/TBF Avengers and the SB2C Helldiver aircraft that the Pitot probes are located on the outboard wing tips of these aircraft. Now, the location is not the primary question here, but the next one is. Why is it that the Avenger and the Helldiver have rather long and extended Pitot Probes in their respective configurations as they have ? And, in addition to that, perhaps Gary (Retroaviation) could weigh in on this topic as well due to the Pitot probe configuration on Diamond Lil's sisters had with respect to the Pitot probes that the B-24's had. All of these aircraft have very lengthy and these probes seemed to be, at least in my warped mind, added to the airframes as almost an afterthought.

Any comments are most welcome.....and I thank you all for for your input.

Respectfully,

Paul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 10:54 am
Posts: 920
Location: Madison, MS
Why don't you ask something simple, like, "Why did they put the datum there?"

Part of the engineering philosophy at the time is to get the probe into "clean" air, that is not influenced by the airframe disturbances. It's what was in the engineers mind when he was at the drawing board.

_________________
If God had wanted man to fly behind a flat motor, Pratt Whitney would've built one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 11:23 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
All I can tell you is that I've heard that the TBM pitot tube is bent the way it is so that it wouldn't scrape the ground when the wings swung back. That doesn't really make sense on the Helldiver though. Heck, I'm just a greasy mechanic. I don't know nuthin' about no pitot tubes. Although, I do know that I'm putting some tubes on the B-24 that protrude outward from the fuselage, like the "A" model originally had. ;-)

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:14 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:54 pm
Posts: 2593
Location: VT
maybe they found that if there up out of the airflow of the wing, that there more accurate being that comming aboard carrier, the big heavy airplanes are at a little higher angle of attack??????

_________________
Long Live the N3N-3 "The Last US Military Bi-Plane" 1940-1959
Badmouthing Stearmans on WIX since 2005
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Jim MacDonald, phil65 and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group