This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Sun Dec 24, 2006 5:28 pm
Great pics!!!
The Phantom just looks like a really really early version.
Sun Dec 24, 2006 7:34 pm
i think it's an early phantom prototype, i recall seeing them in a near identical canopy configuration.
Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:33 pm
The Phantom is one of the early F4H-1. That is the original canopy configuration. Gripes about poor visibility for the RIO gave us the configuration we are all familiar with.
I think there were something like 11 built in this config. There are only 4-5 survivors.
Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:52 pm
Here's another early Phanthom from the WIX last week:
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/p ... hp?t=10289
Thanks for the Lex pics.
Jerry
Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:57 pm
Here's another early Phanthom from the WIX last week:
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/p ... hp?t=10289
Thanks for the Lex pics.
Jerry
Sun Dec 24, 2006 11:07 pm
Cool pics. The F-14 on the deck by the way is the same one that was marked as "Mavericks" F-14 in the movie Top Gun.
Mon Dec 25, 2006 1:26 am
shame such a rare phantom has been painted incorrectly
they could of gotten a F-4B from boneyard and restored her..
that F4H-1 deserves to go Pensacola me thinks
Mon Dec 25, 2006 1:59 am
Have any pics of the A-3 Whale
Mon Dec 25, 2006 2:25 am
Saber driver it's worse than just bad paint. Last time I saw her she was full of intergranular corrosion. You'll also notice that the outer wing panels are also missing.
Look closely at the aircraft that have been repainted by the museum. None of them are right! Wrong fonts, wrong positions, mishmash of squadron markings. The TA-4F sign has been made up for a TA-4J in the poorly done marine markings. The TA-4J is the documented Bkue Angel 7 jet that I used as an example in another thread about historical accuracy.
The A-4C on a stick has since been painted in Blue Angel colors. Even though they never flew the C.
Mon Dec 25, 2006 11:25 am
Make you wonder why with the information that is readily available why they can't get the markings correct. I know they do what is "flashy" to draw in spectators, but it's doing a disservice to the men that flew those birds.
Mon Dec 25, 2006 2:38 pm
I used to volunteer on the Lex when the museum first opened. A good portion of those planes were barged in from Pensacola then craned on deck. At the time there were only about 8 or so dedicated people to work on the planes, we put most of them together and cleaned them up the best we could. Then politics got involved and I got out of there as fast as I could.
Many days the volunteers butted heads with the people in charge about the retarded decisions on the aircraft. The main paid employee that was in charge of the aircraft was replaced after he brought the issues up.
I remember the TBM being brought in with its new paintjob and the new main guy running out with a can of clearcoat and sprayed the top of the aircraft, if you look closely you can see the running of the clearcoat. Then plane hadnt been back on deck for a day before the pain job was ruined.
Mon Dec 25, 2006 4:45 pm
Wish I had been there during the filming on Pearl Harbor when they flew the B-25 off the deck.
Thu Dec 28, 2006 10:51 am
Connery wrote:
The same Phantom as it looked during my visit in 1993:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=5828172
Tillerman.
Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:40 pm
Look on the bright side...at least the SBD is in the correct markings!
Jerry
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.