Need some work done on my house & car
Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:21 pm
Wondered why Swoose and the Horten hadn't been worked on and displayed yet..it all becomes clear...Govt. Outsourcing? Creative Allocation of Resources? Smear Campaign?
Smithsonian IG found misuse of resources
By James V. Grimaldi
Updated: 1:01 a.m. ET April 10, 2007
An internal Smithsonian investigation concluded in 2003 that top supervisors at the institution's aeronautical restoration facility in Maryland were using government employees and materials for personal projects, according to legal proceedings last year.
Five employees testified that they and others were asked to do outside work by Tom Alison, the collections chief of the National Air and Space Museum, and Bill D. Reese, restoration supervisor at the Paul E. Garber Preservation, Restoration and Storage Facility in Suitland.
The work -- referred to as home projects or "homeys" -- sometimes would take employees away from museum business for days. Among the items repaired were a Colt .45 handgun, motorcycles, bicycles, a candleholder and antique cars, such as an Austin-Healey Bugeye Sprite. Jobs were done for friends and colleagues of Alison, Reese and others.
The Smithsonian inspector general's office investigated and referred allegations of "embezzlement and conversion of public money and property" against Alison and Reese to federal prosecutors, according to the conclusion of a previously unreleased April 2003 inspector general's memorandum.
The inspector general also found that John R. "Jack" Dailey, the director of the National Air and Space Museum for the last seven years, had a tow bar and a seat latch repaired on his private aircraft by Smithsonian workers. Dailey, 73, a retired four-star Marine Corps general, oversees the museum's three main branches -- on the Mall, at Dulles International Airport and at the Garber facility, which was run by Alison.
Prosecution was declined "in favor of administrative action," the memo stated. An administrative review resulted in no written disciplinary action, according to testimony from Smithsonian officials. The review was overseen by Sheila Burke, the No. 2 official at the Smithsonian under then-Secretary Lawrence M. Small.
A redacted version of the memo surfaced in September in a U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board hearing on the firing of one of the whistle-blowers who had raised the allegations.
Dailey received a verbal admonishment. A Smithsonian spokeswoman said he also paid $50 to the institution -- an amount he estimated to be five times the value of the work done on his airplane. Dailey had hip replacement surgery last month and was unavailable for comment, an Air and Space Museum spokeswoman said.
‘A minor matter’
"I cannot tell you that I know of a more ethical person who is more frugal," Smithsonian spokeswoman Linda St. Thomas said. "This is a minor matter with regards to Jack Dailey. He's beloved at the institution and very well-respected."
Alison, 65, a retired Air Force colonel who flew SR-71 spy planes, said in a brief interview that while he might have "technically" violated policy or the law, the case was blown out of proportion. "There was a giant smear that went on," Alison said. "People were testifying to all sorts of things that were not true." He retired in 2004.
Reese, 51, denied wrongdoing at the hearing. He retired last year. He did not answer messages left on his cellphone.
Burke's deputy, John Lapiana, testified that Alison was not disciplined because he was retiring and Reese was spared punishment because "he no longer had supervisory responsibilities." Burke through a spokeswoman declined a request for an interview.
Robert Johnson, a former criminal investigator for the inspector general's office, testified last year that there were so many violations that he left some out after finding "enough to support some action by management."
Reached at his home near Branson, Mo., Johnson said that after he had verbally referred the case to the U.S. attorney's office, prosecutors "declined the case in exchange for the institution taking some sort of administrative action -- with that understanding."
Channing Phillips, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office, said there was no record of the referral, but conceded it might have occurred.
Johnson, who retired two weeks after he wrote the memo, said he stepped down after 16 years because the inspector general's office had become "politicized."
"The top people at the Smithsonian didn't want the office of inspector general looking into what they considered their affairs, period," he said.
Smithsonian IG found misuse of resources
By James V. Grimaldi
Updated: 1:01 a.m. ET April 10, 2007
An internal Smithsonian investigation concluded in 2003 that top supervisors at the institution's aeronautical restoration facility in Maryland were using government employees and materials for personal projects, according to legal proceedings last year.
Five employees testified that they and others were asked to do outside work by Tom Alison, the collections chief of the National Air and Space Museum, and Bill D. Reese, restoration supervisor at the Paul E. Garber Preservation, Restoration and Storage Facility in Suitland.
The work -- referred to as home projects or "homeys" -- sometimes would take employees away from museum business for days. Among the items repaired were a Colt .45 handgun, motorcycles, bicycles, a candleholder and antique cars, such as an Austin-Healey Bugeye Sprite. Jobs were done for friends and colleagues of Alison, Reese and others.
The Smithsonian inspector general's office investigated and referred allegations of "embezzlement and conversion of public money and property" against Alison and Reese to federal prosecutors, according to the conclusion of a previously unreleased April 2003 inspector general's memorandum.
The inspector general also found that John R. "Jack" Dailey, the director of the National Air and Space Museum for the last seven years, had a tow bar and a seat latch repaired on his private aircraft by Smithsonian workers. Dailey, 73, a retired four-star Marine Corps general, oversees the museum's three main branches -- on the Mall, at Dulles International Airport and at the Garber facility, which was run by Alison.
Prosecution was declined "in favor of administrative action," the memo stated. An administrative review resulted in no written disciplinary action, according to testimony from Smithsonian officials. The review was overseen by Sheila Burke, the No. 2 official at the Smithsonian under then-Secretary Lawrence M. Small.
A redacted version of the memo surfaced in September in a U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board hearing on the firing of one of the whistle-blowers who had raised the allegations.
Dailey received a verbal admonishment. A Smithsonian spokeswoman said he also paid $50 to the institution -- an amount he estimated to be five times the value of the work done on his airplane. Dailey had hip replacement surgery last month and was unavailable for comment, an Air and Space Museum spokeswoman said.
‘A minor matter’
"I cannot tell you that I know of a more ethical person who is more frugal," Smithsonian spokeswoman Linda St. Thomas said. "This is a minor matter with regards to Jack Dailey. He's beloved at the institution and very well-respected."
Alison, 65, a retired Air Force colonel who flew SR-71 spy planes, said in a brief interview that while he might have "technically" violated policy or the law, the case was blown out of proportion. "There was a giant smear that went on," Alison said. "People were testifying to all sorts of things that were not true." He retired in 2004.
Reese, 51, denied wrongdoing at the hearing. He retired last year. He did not answer messages left on his cellphone.
Burke's deputy, John Lapiana, testified that Alison was not disciplined because he was retiring and Reese was spared punishment because "he no longer had supervisory responsibilities." Burke through a spokeswoman declined a request for an interview.
Robert Johnson, a former criminal investigator for the inspector general's office, testified last year that there were so many violations that he left some out after finding "enough to support some action by management."
Reached at his home near Branson, Mo., Johnson said that after he had verbally referred the case to the U.S. attorney's office, prosecutors "declined the case in exchange for the institution taking some sort of administrative action -- with that understanding."
Channing Phillips, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office, said there was no record of the referral, but conceded it might have occurred.
Johnson, who retired two weeks after he wrote the memo, said he stepped down after 16 years because the inspector general's office had become "politicized."
"The top people at the Smithsonian didn't want the office of inspector general looking into what they considered their affairs, period," he said.
Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:12 pm
Hmmmm...interesting article. It amazes me that the senior level managers/supervisors were given "administrative action". I have a feeling that if a general employee did something similar they'd lose their jobs and have criminal charges against them.
Kind of reminds of the way the military works. If you're an officer (especially a field grade officer) and do something unethical, you're given a letter of reprimand. If you're an officer and do something illegal they have an enlisted man do the jail time for you.
John
Kind of reminds of the way the military works. If you're an officer (especially a field grade officer) and do something unethical, you're given a letter of reprimand. If you're an officer and do something illegal they have an enlisted man do the jail time for you.
John
Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:20 pm
Who would ever think that something shady would be going on in Government run Institutions? No, can't be!
At least they were "supposed" to get a stern letter. That should cover it.
Regards,
Mike
At least they were "supposed" to get a stern letter. That should cover it.
Regards,
Mike
Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:35 pm
I will reserve my comments on the NASM to myself, but I don't see the example of the guy bringing a seat latch and a tow bar to work on as a big deal as he more than likely needed to use a tool or two. It was something that probably took little time to fix. As for te one that has people fixing up their houses and cars off site, that sucks.
Tue Apr 10, 2007 8:38 pm
Yeah. What were they paying them in crates of Astronaut ice cream?
Also saw another article in Houston paper that the NASM had only 4.5 million vistors to the two locations in 2006. Apparently this is much lower than the high water mark of 9 million in 2003. Suggestions for the decrease range from no gallery changes to admin overinflating the 2003 numbers. Don't know who to believe.
I spoke to a disgruntled NASM docent and they said things were getting better after the purge. Guess time will tell.
Also saw another article in Houston paper that the NASM had only 4.5 million vistors to the two locations in 2006. Apparently this is much lower than the high water mark of 9 million in 2003. Suggestions for the decrease range from no gallery changes to admin overinflating the 2003 numbers. Don't know who to believe.
I spoke to a disgruntled NASM docent and they said things were getting better after the purge. Guess time will tell.