Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Prince William gets high

Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:22 am

LONDON (Reuters Life!) - Prince William talked on Thursday about his nerves ahead of the first solo flight of his RAF pilot training.

The second-in-line to the throne is two weeks into his training stint at the RAF's Cranwell school in Lincolnshire.

William, 25, described his surprise when his instructor said he was ready to take over the controls earlier this month.

"It was one of those experiences when I thought ... you know, hopefully I'll get another practice," he told BBC television.

"And the next thing I know, my instructor jumps out and goes 'Get on with it', and I was left there sort of looking around going, er, what?

"So I just did it, and once you got up in the air it was fine."

Known as Flying Officer William Wales, he has begun his training on a propeller-driven Grob 115E light aircraft, known as a Tutor.

He will then move to RAF Linton-on-Ouse in North Yorkshire where he will be trained to fly the faster Tucano T1 plane, before finally progressing to RAF Shawbury in Shropshire to fly the Squirrel helicopter.

The prince, who has spent the past year with the Household Cavalry's Blues and Royals, said he had been ribbed by his colleagues about his life in the Army.

"I keep sort of having lots of jokes about the Army ...that is fine, and I stick up for them," he said.

His RAF colleagues were "a bunch of really good guys, love their flying, all really dedicated guys," he added.

The prince also talked about his frustration with the weather, which has prevented him taking to the skies as much as he would have liked.

It has been a personal ambition for the prince -- the future head of the armed forces -- to learn how to fly and he follows other members of the royal family into the RAF, including his father Prince Charles and uncle Prince Andrew who saw frontline duty as a helicopter pilot in the 1982 Falklands War.

He will start a final attachment, with the Royal Navy, in the early summer.

(Reporting by Avril Ormsby; Editing by Steve Addison and Paul Casciato)

Video: http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/ ... 5&src=news

Prince

Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:21 pm

BDK, that's a pretty cool story. Do you think there is any pressure on that flight instructor to "get it right"? And it was so nice of the royal family to name their son after me, though I go by Bill and not William.

Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:54 pm

I never realized until now that I had never heard what the last name of the Royal Family was. So this Prince OF Wales is William Wales. I suppose it makes sense. And I always thought Prince William's given name was Prince! :lol:

Solo was a big deal for me personally, but there has to be a tremendous amount of pressure when you have paparazzi chasing you around and the entire country is following your every step.

bdk the non-Royal...

Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:59 pm

So he will have served in the army, RAF AND the Navy?

Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:06 pm

Django wrote:So he will have served in the army, RAF AND the Navy?


And let's not forget that little Prince Harry served for a very short while in the SS. :roll:

Image

Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:17 pm

bdk wrote:I never realized until now that I had never heard what the last name of the Royal Family was. So this Prince OF Wales is William Wales.


Actually it's not.....officially he doesn't have need for a surname. On the few required occasions it is offically Mountbatten-Windsor, but I suspect, that's a bit too long to fit on a standard RAF name tag......so he's probably picked Wales for short....as he can :lol:

Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:19 pm

Their name is Windsor now but this was not always the last name
used by the Royal family. Their name sounded too German so it was changed. By decree of the Queen their last name is actually Mountbatten-Windsor.

Mudge the researcher

Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:44 pm

Mudge wrote:Their name is Windsor now but this was not always the last name
used by the Royal family. Their name sounded too German so it was changed. By decree of the Queen their last name is actually Mountbatten-Windsor.

Mudge the researcher


Actually, it's just plain Windsor... It was changed from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha during WWI, as the British government was worried the Royal Family sounded far too German. There was also very real concern over a revolution at home, similar to the one in Russia (which is also why George V never offered assylum to Tsar Nicholas and his family).

Incidentally, Mountbatten (as in Lord Mountbatten) was also anglicized at this time from the more Germanic Battenburg.

No member of the British Royal family usually need a last name. Most simply go by their first name.

Cheers, Richard

Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:05 pm

And they are all Elitist unelected parasites funded by the taxpayer and for what?

Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:16 pm

Andy...You ask me, I'll tell you...I don't know,
but it's
TRADITION
:shock:

Mudge the elitist

Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:23 pm

Mudge wrote:Andy...You ask me, I'll tell you...I don't know,
but it's
TRADITION
:shock:

Mudge the elitist


There continuing sponsorship by the tax payer is indefencible. They are the richest family on the planet.

Why must their asses continue to be kissed?

Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:42 pm

WHOOAA Andy...I'm not defending the tradition. I see absolutely no purpose in their existence as "heads of state" either. The term "leeches" comes to mind.
I was actually trying to make a humorous reference to a line from "Fiddler on the Roof". When asked why things were done a certain way, Tevya replies,
"You ask me. I'll tell you. (long pause) I don't know. But it's TRADITION."
Sorry for the obtusness of the post. (Is obtusness a real word?)
I do better next time.

Mudge the chagrined :oops:

Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:55 pm

Mudge wrote:WHOOAA Andy...I'm not defending the tradition. I see absolutely no purpose in their existence as "heads of state" either. The term "leeches" comes to mind.
I was actually trying to make a humorous reference to a line from "Fiddler on the Roof". When asked why things were done a certain way, Tevya replies,
"You ask me. I'll tell you. (long pause) I don't know. But it's TRADITION."
Sorry for the obtusness of the post. (Is obtusness a real word?)
I do better next time.

Mudge the chagrined :oops:


Its ok Mudge I understand! No offence intended on my part towards you!

Its a shame that a perfectly intelligent and impressionable young human being (and his brother) are being poisoned by the belief that they are somehow the chosen Elitists and better than all of us and don't need to earn their crust in life. Poor example to the rest of the World I'd say.

Sad thing is, he probably is a top bloke and will make a good pilot. (unlike his father who whilst 'in command' crashed a 146 after landing long, down wind on a short downhill runway with zero currency and then got an RAF right hand seater to take the blame for not taking ownership of his cock up until too late. (tax payer fixed up the plane so thats alright then)

He'll end up with his head up his tushy like ALL the rest of them once he realy grasps the concept of the UK owing him a living.....for ever.

Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:13 pm

AndyG wrote:
Mudge wrote:WHOOAA Andy...I'm not defending the tradition. I see absolutely no purpose in their existence as "heads of state" either. The term "leeches" comes to mind.
I was actually trying to make a humorous reference to a line from "Fiddler on the Roof". When asked why things were done a certain way, Tevya replies,
"You ask me. I'll tell you. (long pause) I don't know. But it's TRADITION."
Sorry for the obtusness of the post. (Is obtusness a real word?)
I do better next time.

Mudge the chagrined :oops:


Its ok Mudge I understand! No offence intended on my part towards you!

Its a shame that a perfectly intelligent and impressionable young human being (and his brother) are being poisoned by the belief that they are somehow the chosen Elitists and better than all of us and don't need to earn their crust in life. Poor example to the rest of the World I'd say.

Sad thing is, he probably is a top bloke and will make a good pilot. (unlike his father who whilst 'in command' crashed a 146 after landing long, down wind on a short downhill runway with zero currency and then got an RAF right hand seater to take the blame for not taking ownership of his cock up until too late. (tax payer fixed up the plane so thats alright then)

He'll end up with his head up his tushy like ALL the rest of them once he realy grasps the concept of the UK owing him a living.....for ever.



And the relevance to Warbirds is.......?

Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:34 pm

Andy:
What's that got to do with warbirds?
Thx,
VL
Post a reply