This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:16 pm
Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:38 pm
Sure looks like it. I can't imagine that the engine would have washed ashore though, so maybe the shifting sands uncovered it? Fuselage might be there somewhere. I would have thought that if it had ever been seen by the authorities the guns would have been removed immediately.
Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:44 pm
Look Hellcat.
Possible fus or part of it might have burned.
Rich
Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:44 pm
Looks like an F6F. I might say that it looks as though there was a fire in the fuselage/center section and it got burned out. Especially when you look at the type of damage to the wings near the roots. Just my take on it!
Jerry
Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:45 pm
bdk wrote:so maybe the shifting sands uncovered it? Fuselage might be there somewhere. I would have thought that if it had ever been seen by the authorities the guns would have been removed immediately.
Recent shifting sands were mentioned -- quite remote as well. But I looked and re looked at the pics, the guns seem to be there.
Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:55 pm
Hellcat,
bet the navy is just waiting for someone to try and take it
Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:59 pm
Used to be an F6F. Almost looks like the cylinders have melted away leaving just the steel sleeves.
Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:55 pm
I'd just like to tell y'all how immeasurably proud of myself I am.
I saw the images and thought 'Hellcat'. The farther I read and saw all of you say the same thing...and l'il ol' photographer/musician me came to the same conclusion in a place full of actually, truly informed folk.
I have to stop posting now, as I have hurt my shoulder patting myself on the back.
Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:56 pm
This is a double post.
Last edited by
fotobass on Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:57 pm
This, on the other hand, is a triple post. Totally different than the double post, as it is...well...third.
Last edited by
fotobass on Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:11 am
Apparently, tho, somehow your need for redundancy remains unquenched...lol
M
Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:17 am
corsair166b wrote:Apparently, tho, somehow your need for redundancy remains unquenched...lol
M
My comedy is so massive, it bears repeating.
repeating.
repeating.
Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:05 am
I received another email from the photographer stating that the fuselage was seen at an earlier date but is now under the sand.
Any ideas why this bird would have been south of the border?
Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:45 am
Mike,
Here are known losses of F6F's in Mexico:
BuNo 40124, -3, 31 Dec 43, ditched eng failure 8 mi off Rosarito Beach.
40179, -3, 23 Nov 43, stalled & dove in near Rosarito.
40529, -3, 8 Dec 45, ditched eng failure off Point Canoas.
41609, -3, 24 Mar 44, crashed on take off from Wasp off of Mexico.
42309, -3, 8 Dec 45, lost & ditched due to eng failure off Point Canoas.
42646, -3, 16 Jul 45, flew into mountain near Monterey.
70423, -5, 18 Nov 45, forced landing ON BEACH near Baja.
94307, -5, 6 Oct 50, lost forced landing 17 mi west of Mexicali.
94454, -5N, 29 Apr 50, forced landing at Cabaraca Field.
This info is from Ted Darcy's Wreckfinders book on the F6F.
Mac
Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:47 am
Mike Schneider wrote:Any ideas why this bird would have been south of the border?
I know there were training squadrons that used P-39s in the Gulf of Mexico that made attacks on B-29 formations in order to train the bomber crews how to fend off Japanese fighters - perhaps they also used Hellcats? Or perhaps it was on a long distance over water training flight and had a problem...neat photos regardless.
Zack
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.