This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Wed May 21, 2008 1:21 pm
I have a quick little question about materials: I am about to order the materials I need to build my B-26 radio rack display, and I need to know which would be more proper to simulate the original- 2024T3 Alclad, or 6061T4 bare aluminum.(this is for the shelves)
I am not sure which the radios are composed of: they have(naturally) the dull-aluminum look. Would the radio rack have the same? I don't think 2024T3 Alclad would get as dull over time.
If anyone can answer quickly, I'd appreciate it- I need to order this afternoon, and am trying to get it pretty close.(I am going with a .050 thickness sheet, rather than the original .063(+-) for economics, as the rack won't be experiencing the same stresses as original...
Thanks-
Robbie
PS Forgot how time consuming hand drafting can be...
R.
Wed May 21, 2008 2:04 pm
2024 would be correct for the period.
I don't think 6061 was used extensively then. Particularly for flat stock, ie non-formed, applications.
Rich
Wed May 21, 2008 3:06 pm
Thanks!
I went with the 2024T3, but had to go with .040 thickness- they were out of .050, but I figure, for my purposes(a display reproduction of a B-26 radio rack) that it should be fine, as it won't be going on long missions over NW Europe...
Robbie
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.