Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:28 pm
Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:30 pm
Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:56 pm
tulsaboy wrote:(hesitates to ask) Does anyone know how far from airworthy this one is? I know that it's not going to fly, but it sure looks awful good!
kevin
Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:57 pm
Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:33 pm
Thu Aug 21, 2008 2:35 am
Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:26 am
Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:29 am
Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:09 am
Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:11 am
Thu Aug 21, 2008 11:41 am
So what did you design that contributed to the unconditional surrender of Japan in WW2?engguy wrote:So how many years of college did the engineer have that designed that engines exhaust system and cylinder exhaust placement, and also the one that designed the cowling?
That is so typical. Yeah nothing beats higher education. LOL
Thu Aug 21, 2008 11:58 am
The Inspector wrote:Gary, Gary, Gary, this airframe is the property of the MoF who's sworn policy is 'now why in heck would we want flying airplanes in an airplane museum?' The only thing that gonna get run on 54T when finished will be it's condition and that will be downward over time.
Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:00 pm
mustangdriver wrote:The Inspector wrote:Gary, Gary, Gary, this airframe is the property of the MoF who's sworn policy is 'now why in heck would we want flying airplanes in an airplane museum?' The only thing that gonna get run on 54T when finished will be it's condition and that will be downward over time.
Yeah because any airplane that is static just goes down hill. Give me a break.
Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:28 pm
Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:28 pm
The Inspector wrote:Gary, Gary, Gary, this airframe is the property of the MoF who's sworn policy is 'now why in heck would we want flying airplanes in an airplane museum?' The only thing that gonna get run on 54T when finished will be it's condition and that will be downward over time.