Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Single Engine B17! (& other oddities)

Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:13 am

Rajay's post about the Rutan-designed B-17 got me looking around the web.

Check out this single-engine B-17. Weird! http://www.pointniner.com/2008/08/single-engine-b-17-other-rare-aircraft.html

You may also want to peruse this great online collection of other strange and rare WWII aircraft from both the Axis & Allied sides. http://rareaircraf1.greyfalcon.us/

Just when you thought you'd seen it all... :)

Enjoy!

PS - Since I originally posted this 2 hours ago, several people have asserted that the B-17 picture must be photo-shopped. I have since conducted additional research, and suspect the picture to be a (fascinating) fake.

See E.G.:
http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2455

and

http://aerofiles.com/boe-b17turbo.jpg (note that the top picture looks to have been taken during the same flight as the picture that started this post (http://www.pointniner.com/2008/08/single-engine-b-17-other-rare-aircraft.html)
Last edited by Zagi-2 on Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:55 am, edited 3 times in total.

Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:51 am

Photoshopped B-17

Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:56 am

It has to be a retouched photograph of one of the 5 engine test beds. Everything about the single engine photo looks identical to the 5 engine one. If anything so fantastic as to remove the other 4 engines had ever been done I can't imagine we would only be discovering it now.

Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:23 am

John Dupre wrote:It has to be a retouched photograph of one of the 5 engine test beds. Everything about the single engine photo looks identical to the 5 engine one. If anything so fantastic as to remove the other 4 engines had ever been done I can't imagine we would only be discovering it now.


Yep, a photochop job. Anyone who is unconvinced should ask him/herself where the main gear would go in a B-17 with no nacelles.

Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:55 am

Kyleb wrote:
John Dupre wrote:It has to be a retouched photograph of one of the 5 engine test beds. Everything about the single engine photo looks identical to the 5 engine one. If anything so fantastic as to remove the other 4 engines had ever been done I can't imagine we would only be discovering it now.


Yep, a photochop job. Anyone who is unconvinced should ask him/herself where the main gear would go in a B-17 with no nacelles.


Maybe after the difficulties they had with the landing gear on the Rutan canard YB-40-RU :wink: as we previously discussed,
they used this single engine B-17 flying testbed to develop the tandem landing gear system they later used on the B-47. :D

(Rule of thumb: the best BS contains at least a kernel of truth to lend it a touch of validity....) 8)

Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:27 am

Who needs landing gear when you have antigravity generators on board! :wink: (just about as believable!!!)

Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:31 am

b29flteng wrote:Photoshopped B-17


yep! :lol:

Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:04 pm

i subsrcibe to so many av mags & can tell you this has been 1 hot topic lately!!! :rolleyes:

Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:33 pm

Anybody got pix of the Liberty Belle in its five engine configuration?

The second link has some real bizarros. The first time I looked at the listing of American a/c the first one gave me a reaction of "man, someone's been rooting around unsupervised in the storage hangar."

Re: Single Engine B17! (& other oddities)

Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:26 am

Zagi-2 wrote:Rajay's post about the Rutan-designed B-17 got me looking around the web.

Check out this single-engine B-17. Weird! http://www.pointniner.com/2008/08/single-engine-b-17-other-rare-aircraft.html

You may also want to peruse this great online collection of other strange and rare WWII aircraft from both the Axis & Allied sides. http://rareaircraf1.greyfalcon.us/

Just when you thought you'd seen it all... :)

Enjoy!

PS - Since I originally posted this 2 hours ago, several people have asserted that the B-17 picture must be photo-shopped. I have since conducted additional research, and suspect the picture to be a (fascinating) fake.

See E.G.:
http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2455

and

http://aerofiles.com/boe-b17turbo.jpg (note that the top picture looks to have been taken during the same flight as the picture that started this post (http://www.pointniner.com/2008/08/single-engine-b-17-other-rare-aircraft.html)


Pretty sure thats Liberty Belle! Yep, another photoshop job. I really hope no one here thinks its real!
Post a reply