FAA T-6 incident report....

[JBoyle]

From today's preliminary accident/incident summary on the FAA website:
http://www.faa.gov/data_research/accide ... 0222_N.txt

IDENTIFICATION
Regis#: 76BZ Make/Model: T6 Description: T-6, AT-6, BC-1, SNJ, TEXAN, HARVARD
Date: 02/20/2010 Time: 2230

Event Type: Accident Highest Injury: None Mid Air: N Missing: N
Damage: Substantial

LOCATION
City: MESA State: AZ Country: US

DESCRIPTION
AIRCRAFT ON LANDING WENT OFF THE RUNWAY AND THE NOSE GEAR COLLAPSED, MESA,
AZ

INJURY DATA Total Fatal: 0
# Crew: 1 Fat: 0 Ser: 0 Min: 0 Unk:
# Pass: 0 Fat: 0 Ser: 0 Min: 0 Unk:
# Grnd: Fat: 0 Ser: 0 Min: 0 Unk:

WEATHER: SPECI 202230Z KFFZ 15008KT 30SM SCT030 BKN050 12/05 A2987

OTHER DATA
Activity: Pleasure Phase: Landing Operation: OTHER


FAA FSDO: SCOTTSDALE, AZ (WP07) Entry date: 02/22/2010


Does the FAA know something I don't? But, IIRC, wasn't there a nosewheel conversion for the T-6 back in the 50s?

[bluehawk15]

Wow! The Feds are so informative! I've never heard of a T-6 having it's nosegear collapse when it left the runway before!

[C VEICH]

You would think they could at least make note of whether it was the right or left nosegear which collapsed.

[warbird1]

That doesn't surprise me at all. These initial reports almost always have wrong information in them, particularly when warbirds are involved. Remember most FSDO's who file these reports know absolutely nothing about warbirds. They wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a P-51 and a T-6. They probably know Cessna's and Pipers relatively well, but not much else.

BTW, the "Bacon Super 6" nosewheel T-6 still survives, but I don't believe it has flown in many decades. I seem to recall that it was somewhere out in Southern California - Van Nuys perhaps? Obviously that wasn't the plane in this case.

[sdennison]

C'mon...give them break. They couldn't see a nose gear so it must have collapsed! Pretty straight forward to me.

[John S]

That doesn't surprise me at all. These initial reports almost always have wrong information in them, particularly when warbirds are involved. Remember most FSDO's who file these reports know absolutely nothing about warbirds. They wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a P-51 and a T-6. They probably know Cessna's and Pipers relatively well, but not much else.

BTW, the "Bacon Super 6" nosewheel T-6 still survives, but I don't believe it has flown in many decades. I seem to recall that it was somewhere out in Southern California - Van Nuys perhaps? Obviously that wasn't the plane in this case.

Whiteman field is where it sits today.

[T J Johansen]

Shot at Whiteman Nov. 28 2009. Sad to see it fall into disrepair like this...


T J

[jtramo]

Looks like T-6, a Navion and a T28 had an orgy.......uggghhhhlleeeee

[Taylor Stevenson]

I think I know this answer, but has anyone tried to obtain this aircraft from the current owner? Who owns it? It's a cool looking bird!

[Jack Cook]

If I recall the owner is not someone you really want to deal with

[RyanShort1]

I'm not really sure what the incentive would be to have a T-6 with a training wheel.

Ryan

[ZRX61]

If I recall the owner is not someone you really want to deal with

& you have a lot of money laying around...

[bdk]

Shot at Whiteman Nov. 28 2009. Sad to see it fall into disrepair like this...

Disrepair? Someone has been airing up the tires for the past 30 years!

[Randy Haskin]

I'm not really sure what the incentive would be to have a T-6 with a training wheel.

This.

[sdennison]

I'm not really sure what the incentive would be to have a T-6 with a training wheel.

This.

Wow! Well said!