Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:07 am

Image

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:10 am

Gee I hope so, because I have 8000 hours in DC9s.

Dave

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:28 am

If it was an ex-military DC-9 like one of the former Air Force or Navy C-9's it would be, but otherwise no.

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:13 pm

jwc50 wrote:If it was an ex-military DC-9 like one of the former Air Force or Navy C-9's it would be, but otherwise no.

It's an ex airline -83. I'd like to see it's N # so I can find it's original operator. Some Super 80's were used by the Navy as ground echelon haulers, I saw a lot of them in and out of NAS Whidbey Island moving support folks to/ from carriers, now being replaced by C-40's.

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:18 pm

Sometimes when I fly it I have a war with maintenance issues, personnel issues, or passenger issues. Does that count? :lol:

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:28 pm

The Inspector wrote:
jwc50 wrote:If it was an ex-military DC-9 like one of the former Air Force or Navy C-9's it would be, but otherwise no.

It's an ex airline -83. I'd like to see it's N # so I can find it's original operator. Some Super 80's were used by the Navy as ground echelon haulers, I saw a lot of them in and out of NAS Whidbey Island moving support folks to/ from carriers, now being replaced by C-40's.

Found it. It's a fairly recent airframe, 11/19/1997, l/n 53022 original customer ALASKA AIRLINES as N 949AS now N 949 NS. ALASKA did have a couple of brand new MD-80's deliver from LGB to KPAE /BADWRENCH and went right into TWA markings as ASA was starting to phase out the MD's for 737NG's

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:40 pm

No politics on WIX.

Mudge the conformist

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:14 pm

Can it be considered politics since he lost and we are talking about an aircraft?

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:20 pm

I'd just like to point out that is a MASSIVE flag there in the background. Seriously, how is that thing even staying up?

Also, I like the fade effect in the blue on the lower fuselage. Nicely done.

Lynn

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:25 pm

Starch. Lots and lots of starch.

Or maybe what looks like scaffolding behind the flag?

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:18 pm

lmritger wrote:I'd just like to point out that is a MASSIVE flag there in the background. Seriously, how is that thing even staying up?

Also, I like the fade effect in the blue on the lower fuselage. Nicely done.

Lynn

I think the fade is just reflection from the gray wing paint and the ramp on what looks like a cloudy day since other pictures show a solid medium blue lower, and is that flag touching the ground?

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:31 pm

The Inspector wrote:.... is that flag touching the ground?

It doesn't appear so....looks like the bottom border is attached to the frame fixture set in the ground.

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:04 pm

Two birds, operated for the Romney Campaign, both by USA Jet Airlines

N949NS as mentioned
N215US built 1970, ex-Swissair HB-IDO and Northwest N986US

and no.

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:18 pm

The airplane was/ is being operated by a governor, so yes, it does count

Re: Is this considered a warbird?

Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:45 pm

In what way does an aircraft being operated by a former governor make it a warbird? :? That;s like saying John Wayne was a hero cause he was in a movie about Iwo Jima once.
Post a reply