Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Vlado's new rating

Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:45 pm

4 days ago (I'm gettin' sluggish :( )

Congrats Vlado!

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Warbird- ... =2&theater

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:50 am

:drink3: Congrats!
Robbie

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 3:16 pm

Congrats Vlado...

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:37 pm

Congratulations, Vlado! :supz:

:heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart:
SKYRAIDERS!!!
:heart: :heart: :heart: :heart: :heart:

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 6:12 pm

Very Cool! Congrats!! :drink3:

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:21 pm

And another! :drink3:

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:24 pm

Anyone care to elaborate for those of us without Facebook?

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:52 pm

Vlado received his Skyraider type rating.

Craig

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 8:28 pm

Most people get heavier as they get older, Vlado just flies heavier planes.........
Fighter pilot to bomber pilot ? you feeling ok ?

Re: Vlado's new rating

Mon Aug 12, 2013 8:45 pm

... attack pilot ...

On a serious note, a buddy who has a fair amount of P-51 & A-1 time says that the A-1 is actually more enjoyable to fly; hydraulically boosted controls, etc. He also admits that a T-28 will beat a Mustang down low and that the Thunder Mustang out-performs the real thing down low as well, but that's another story.

The Mustang will frequently win with cool factor, but I'd rather be a Skyraider guy when I drink enough milk and grow up. I don't know how the AD-1 might differ systems-wise from the later models, but I hope that Vlado chimes in and shares with us his impressions (compare/contrast) of flying the beast.

Ken

Re: Vlado's new rating

Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:29 am

Ken wrote:.....He also admits that a T-28 will beat a Mustang down low and that the Thunder Mustang out-performs the real thing down low as well..........

Which doesn't explain why a modified T-28 with a more powerful engine is still much slower than even an unmodified, stock P-51 at Reno. And Thunder Mustang lap speeds are again slower than those of a stock P-51.

Re: Vlado's new rating

Tue Aug 13, 2013 4:22 am

Amazing to climb aboard such a large, single seat aircraft.
Strong engine. Very easy controls. Lots of mass inertia....most noticeable in formation flying.....takes a bit of power to move into position.
Very simple cockpit and controls.
With weapons on wings, cruise speed is 180 knots.
VL

Re: Vlado's new rating

Tue Aug 13, 2013 7:01 am

Mike wrote:
Ken wrote:.....He also admits that a T-28 will beat a Mustang down low and that the Thunder Mustang out-performs the real thing down low as well..........

Which doesn't explain why a modified T-28 with a more powerful engine is still much slower than even an unmodified, stock P-51 at Reno. And Thunder Mustang lap speeds are again slower than those of a stock P-51.


I should have clarified; not overall speed, but general handling, stick forces, turning, climb rate, and pilot enjoyment factor.

Ken

Re: Vlado's new rating

Tue Aug 13, 2013 8:28 am

Ken wrote:I should have clarified; not overall speed, but general handling, stick forces, turning, climb rate, and pilot enjoyment factor.

Ken

Then perhaps he should have bought a Chipmunk! :)
Post a reply