Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Australian B-24 Liberator Restoration.

Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:47 am

Australian B-24 Liberator Restoration. Quick Update.

Thanks to Phil Buckley for the article.


http://www.warbirdsnews.com/warbird-res ... ation.html

Re: Australian B-24 Liberator Restoration.

Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:12 am

This is going to be one good looking aircraft when finished. The interior is looking amazing. Keep up the good down there.

Re: Australian B-24 Liberator Restoration.

Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:00 pm

That is an awesome restoration!

It's just too bad that we don't have one here in San Diego, CA. Birthplace of the B-24 :(

Re: Australian B-24 Liberator Restoration.

Thu Jul 10, 2014 9:56 am

Looks great!

As far as restorations, I wonder at what point the two LB-30s in storage in Colorado will be worth the effort to restore them back to flying? Or een better restore them as B-24 bombers!

Tom P.

Re: Australian B-24 Liberator Restoration.

Thu Jul 10, 2014 10:09 am

Someone (and I freely admit that I am in no such position, and am merrily spending that "someone's" money...) should cobble together an LB-30 out of those as static, and then trade it to the NMUSAF for the Barksdale B-24J. NMUSAF would get an early model they could paint up in British markings or in the pre-war neutrality markings, so they could start the process of having "one of each" like they seem to have done with B-17s... We would get another potential flyer!

(sigh) When am I winning that lottery again?

kevin

Re: Australian B-24 Liberator Restoration.

Thu Jul 10, 2014 12:31 pm

right there with you on that plan Kevin!

I assume that the B-24s never survived after the war as well (?) as the B-17 due to being a little less durable in applications such as fire fighting. It really is sad there are not more flyer around.

Tom P.

Re: Australian B-24 Liberator Restoration.

Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:11 pm

wendovertom wrote:right there with you on that plan Kevin!

I assume that the B-24s never survived after the war as well (?) as the B-17 due to being a little less durable in applications such as fire fighting. It really is sad there are not more flyer around.

Tom P.



Sure to P-off the B-17istas, but I think it was due to the B-24 being a better bomber. Meaning it was better optimized for the strategic bombing role, rather than the B-17, designed when no one was really sure what that role actually would be. This led to the B-17 being less specialized, and thus better able to be adapted to a wider range of activities
Post a reply