This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:26 pm
... it would look something like this.
Mustang just needs just a bit of wear and dirt and you'd never know the difference.

Photo credit and date unknown, but I believe this was at a show in the UK.
Thu Apr 28, 2016 7:55 am
missing I guess if one wanted to really 'disect' it. Probably a cuffed prop and MNF would be even more convincing. Looks to be a woman sitting there as well, but that could have happened back then.
Thu Apr 28, 2016 12:24 pm
Wow, really good photo, I'm impressed!
Mark Allen M wrote:Looks to be a woman sitting there as well, but that could have happened back then.
Yeah, one with the Red Cross or a War Correspondent could have fit into that scene, looking like that. I agree that this appears to be a woman there.
Sun May 01, 2016 11:04 am
No armor plate, pilot headrest or radio stack behind the armor plate or antenna behind the canopy. Dead giveaway as a modern photo.
Mon May 02, 2016 7:41 am
p51 wrote:Wow, really good photo, I'm impressed!
Mark Allen M wrote:Looks to be a woman sitting there as well, but that could have happened back then.
Yeah, one with the Red Cross or a War Correspondent could have fit into that scene, looking like that. I agree that this appears to be a woman there.
Not easy to see from distance, but I would say she's also wearing a male issue garrison hat by the looks of it rather than the correct female version which has a more pronounced and lower profile 'banana' shape.
There's a few other issues uniform wise that show the photo up as being taken in modern times..........
But, that's all nitpicking, and it's still a cool photo
Mon May 02, 2016 8:41 am
And we haven't even gotten into the invasion stripes and gear bay color debates yet!
Mon May 02, 2016 9:30 am
Hence the "Something like this" statement I posted. Is it spot on? h*ll no!, but it's relatively close minus to obvious stuff you perfectionists catch. It's a neat photo never-the-less.
Mon May 02, 2016 5:38 pm
Firebird wrote:Not easy to see from distance, but I would say she's also wearing a male issue garrison hat by the looks of it rather than the correct female version which has a more pronounced and lower profile 'banana' shape.
Actually for a female war correspondent, there are period photos that clearly support they wore plenty of male stuff for the simple logistics of obtained uniform parts in a male-dominated ETO...
Sun May 08, 2016 8:34 am
Just a bit of dirt and grime .... could have a winner here. Nice shot.
Sun May 08, 2016 9:17 am
Mark Allen M wrote:Just a bit of dirt and grime .... could have a winner here. Nice shot.

The power lines, plus the fact that a number of the men in the photo are much too old for their billets, gives it away as a modern reenactment.
Sun May 08, 2016 10:27 am
JFS61 wrote:Mark Allen M wrote:Just a bit of dirt and grime .... could have a winner here. Nice shot.

The power lines, plus the fact that a number of the men in the photo are much too old for their billets, gives it away as a modern reenactment.
Yeah, and the wheel well color is wrong.
Sun May 08, 2016 11:41 am
Tough crowd .... close your eyes and then reopen in a squint ... try to make it a bit blurry
Sun May 08, 2016 3:25 pm
Mark Allen M wrote:Tough crowd .... close your eyes and then reopen in a squint ... try to make it a bit blurry

Sorry, but I can't squint hard enough to turn a couple of 60 year old men into 20 year old fighter jocks in the ETO.
Sun May 08, 2016 3:44 pm
Your correct and I get it! ... those poor reenactors once again get no breaks lol
How about the grass, is it the right color green for ya? ...
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.