Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

The Grumman Avenger "replacement" ...

Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:25 pm

Grumman XTB2F ... or ... (A Grumman S-2 Tracker Before Its Time?)

The Grumman TB2F was a cancelled twin-engined torpedo bomber project, intended as Grumman's successor to the successful TBF Avenger. However, only a mockup was ever constructed.

In 1944, during World War II, the Midway class aircraft carriers were being built, and Grumman attempted to design a new torpedo bomber to accompany those carriers. However, it was soon decided that, among other difficulties, it would be impracticable to efficiently deploy twin-engined aircraft of this size from an aircraft carrier, and the plans were scrapped.

General characteristics

Crew: 3
Length: 52 ft 0 in (15.85 m)
Wingspan: 74 ft 0 in (22.56 m) (Folded span: 36 ft 0 in (10.97 m))
Height: 17 ft 0 in (5.18 m)
Max takeoff weight: 43,937 lb (19,929 kg)
Fuel capacity: 1,960 US Gallon internal fuel
Powerplant: 2 × Pratt & Whitney R-2800-22 Double Wasp radial engine, 2,100 hp (1,600 kW) each
Performance

Maximum speed: 271 kn; 502 km/h (312 mph)
Stall speed: 62 kn; 114 km/h (71.1 mph)
Ferry range: 2,352 nmi; 4,356 km (2,707 mi)
Service ceiling: 31,600 ft (9,600 m)
Armament
Guns:
1× 75 mm cannon and 6× .50 in (12.7 mm) machine guns forward firing
2× .50 in machine guns each in dorsal and ball turrets
Bombs: 1× Mark 13 torpedo or 3,500 lb (1,600 kg) bombs or mines in bomb bay

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Re: The Grumman Avenger "replacement" ...

Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:40 pm

Don't think I've ever seen this before, thanks!

I'd think a Tigercat would make a good torpedo attacker.

Re: The Grumman Avenger "replacement" ...

Mon Jan 21, 2019 3:05 pm

Wing folding also!

Tks for sharing Mark!

Or see here: http://www.vehibase.com/grumman-xtb2f/photo-1.htm

Image

Re: The Grumman Avenger "replacement" ...

Mon Jan 21, 2019 3:11 pm

Snake45 wrote:I'd think a Tigercat would make a good torpedo attacker.


Grumman thought so too!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_XTSF

Re: The Grumman Avenger "replacement" ...

Mon Jan 21, 2019 4:10 pm

Wotta monster.

Compared to the S-2, 8.5 feet longer, 2 feet more wingspan, and 20,000 pounds heavier (max take-off). Much closer in size to the AJ Savage. "When first deployed, the AJ-1 was too large and heavy to be used by any American aircraft carrier except for the Midway class" (Wikipedia).

Richard

Re: The Grumman Avenger "replacement" ...

Mon Jan 21, 2019 4:18 pm

Never knew this existed. Thanks for posting

Re: The Grumman Avenger "replacement" ...

Mon Jan 21, 2019 5:14 pm

A Sperry ball turret with a whole lotta ugly attached! Was the sawhorse optional?

Re: The Grumman Avenger "replacement" ...

Mon Jan 21, 2019 6:19 pm

Very cool S-2 foreshadowing!

Of course the other reason for cancellation was that there simply was not anything left to sink with a torpedo on the Axis side....

Re: The Grumman Avenger "replacement" ...

Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:44 am

Craig59 wrote:A Sperry ball turret with a whole lotta ugly attached! Was the sawhorse optional?


Doesn't look like it got past the mock-up stage.
Post a reply