Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Price of fuel

Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:12 am

What's the current price of 100LL

Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:42 am

Real-time price of $3.62 at a little airport in the upper Midwest this morning.

Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:58 am

$3.35 this morning in South Texas small strip. Over $4.oo at International Airport (SAT)

Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:07 am

KVPZ - Porter County Airport
$3.40 - Cash
$3.59 - Tax

Fuel cost

Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:13 am

Here in fabulous Peachtree City, GA it is over 4.00 a gallon. Now, you factor in feeding a thirsty Mustang, SBD, C-45, Kate, Zero, and a SNJ and you can image our fuel bill. :shock:


The local FBO drools when we have to move our fleet.

Philip

Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:16 am

You should try an F-4 ! :lol:

Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:24 am

At Valdosta Regional (KVLD) in southern GA, it's $4.25!!

Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:27 pm

High.

Sun Apr 16, 2006 1:07 pm

Consider yourselves lucky you don't live this side of the pond.

There's an on-going thread in the Flypast general aviation forum about the price of fuel.

Last updated 6th March, after some playing with a calculator converting litres to US gallons and the exchange rate, how about $8.26!!!!!!!!!

Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:06 pm

:shock: I need a drink!

Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:56 pm

The US Air Force is going to start testing a BioJet JP fuel at Wright Patt. It's supposed to be about .40 per gallon cheaper if they approve it.

Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:21 pm

systemofadown1162 wrote:High.


Way to high, thank you very much........

Lynn

It Will Get Worse

Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:49 pm

As most of the oil from the Middle East is going to be diverted to China the prices will rise sharply.

Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 am

RickH wrote:The US Air Force is going to start testing a BioJet JP fuel at Wright Patt. It's supposed to be about .40 per gallon cheaper if they approve it.


How's the performance?

Found on Google:

These tests showed that JP900 has a flash point higher than required for JP8, a lower viscosity and freezing point and a higher smoke point. The coal-based fuel is lower in aromatics – such compounds as benzene and toluene – than conventional jet fuels and is almost sulfur free. From an energy point of view, JP900 produces almost exactly the same Btu as JP8.

Not only does JP900 meet most of the specification for JP8, but it also has the high flash point required of JP5, naval jet fuel and the thermal stability of JP7, a high performance fuel.

Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:02 pm

RickH wrote:You should try an F-4 ! :lol:
Does that use 100LL???? :?
Post a reply