This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Wed Apr 27, 2005 3:39 pm

Birddog. A friend of mine flew birddogs for the Army. Just getting the chance to use 60 degrees of flaps and do the super steep approach, that would be cool. Other than that one, I like the L5 Stinsons. I (fuzzy memory) read some where that some models had a "Droopy Wing"? I'm not sure what that means but I got the impression that a control could be used to change the wing in some way, maybe it's just flaps.........

Wed Apr 27, 2005 4:05 pm

O.P. wrote:I (fuzzy memory) read some where that some models had a "Droopy Wing"? I'm not sure what that means but I got the impression that a control could be used to change the wing in some way, maybe it's just flaps.........
The L-5C and E-models had ailerons that drooped with the flaps.

Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:33 pm

Hey,
Does this count?

Image

If it doesnt, I will have to say Ercoupe!

Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:13 am

put me in for a westland lysander!! definetely the most unique looking of the bunch & with the most enthralling back ground!! best, tom

Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:13 am

bdk wrote:
O.P. wrote:I (fuzzy memory) read some where that some models had a "Droopy Wing"? I'm not sure what that means but I got the impression that a control could be used to change the wing in some way, maybe it's just flaps.........
The L-5C and E-models had ailerons that drooped with the flaps.


Hi bdk!

That sounds interesting. Does that mean when the flaps are down the ailerons come partially down also?

Thu Apr 28, 2005 12:07 pm

O.P. wrote:
bdk wrote:
O.P. wrote:I (fuzzy memory) read some where that some models had a "Droopy Wing"? I'm not sure what that means but I got the impression that a control could be used to change the wing in some way, maybe it's just flaps.........
The L-5C and E-models had ailerons that drooped with the flaps.


Hi bdk!

That sounds interesting. Does that mean when the flaps are down the ailerons come partially down also?


Not exactly, the flaps and ailerons work independantly of one another. The ailerons can "droop" up to 15 degrees by cranking them down via a hand crank located in the front cockpit above the pilot. While in droop the ailerons still maintain their functionality for roll control.

Quite a cool set-up.

Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:05 pm

Paul Draper wrote:
O.P. wrote:
bdk wrote:
O.P. wrote:I (fuzzy memory) read some where that some models had a "Droopy Wing"? I'm not sure what that means but I got the impression that a control could be used to change the wing in some way, maybe it's just flaps.........
The L-5C and E-models had ailerons that drooped with the flaps.


Hi bdk!

That sounds interesting. Does that mean when the flaps are down the ailerons come partially down also?


Not exactly, the flaps and ailerons work independantly of one another. The ailerons can "droop" up to 15 degrees by cranking them down via a hand crank located in the front cockpit above the pilot. While in droop the ailerons still maintain their functionality for roll control.

Quite a cool set-up.


Maannn! I want to try that out too! Sounds very cool.

Thu Apr 28, 2005 4:06 pm

AirJimL2 wrote:Easy. A Taylorcraft L-2 and an Aeronca L-3. Both World War 2 vintage warbugs built in Ohio.

Jim



Nothing against either plane, but neither were depoyled overseas in any significant numbers....some L-3s were sent to N. Africa by mistake.
L-2s were grounded after a few stall/spin fatal wrecks in training, so the L-4 eventually was named the 'standard for the Army Air forces" in Oct. 43.

If you want a combat paint scheme, you have to have an L-4 or 5....just today I stumbled across a photo of an L-3 in a museum with Invasion stripes.



Now to answer the question...I'd love an L-19 (in neat 1950's red/white markings...or a polished RCAF scheme) but to buy I'm afraid an L-5 or L-16B are more in my price range.

Thu Apr 28, 2005 8:16 pm

Got the "bug" end covered already...

L-5B for the "light bug",
AT-21 for the "light bomber"
now got to work on the fighter and heavy bomber end of things... :lol:

Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:52 am

Always liked the L-4/L-21 just something about the doors (first ride in a plane summer 1966..impressionalble 4yr old in a J3 on floats and the doors "not to be closed cause its summer time!")

next no order: Chipmunk, Storch,L-5

For "family" fun? Always thought a Me-108 would be a good one. next up would be U-10 or a L-20/U-6. Thought that one of those tuque waring gents would have said the last one before me :wink:

Cheers
Tony

Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:31 pm

Tony et al--

I think the RCAF didn't have L-19s--the Canadian Army did. Semantic difference visually, of course, since both services used the same roundels. (Canadian Army also had Cessna Skylanes referred to as "L-182s" in the service...now there's a legit way to make something "vanilla" into a quasi-Warbug. Course you could paint a Beech Musketeer/Sundowner as a CT-134, too).

And yeah, why hasn't Olivier been on here advocating for the DHC-2! (Though I have to admit I've yet to see him sporting a tuque...) :roll:

S.

Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:52 pm

Arrrr!

There be talkin' about the Beaver!!

We'd be having three, one soon to be out of the shop!

Seriously, one's up for sale, the one with the small cabin, we're keeping the two with the extended cabin.

Beavers are very nice birds, slow, but incredibly reliable and though, etc.

You can only replace a Beaver with another Beaver.

Hmmm, Beavers...

8)
Post a reply