Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 5:26 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 11:26 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Last year I heard that Chris Rounds bought the Former Eaa's , former Jim Robinson T-33 that had been sitting outside at Oshkosh for 10 years, installed a tailpipe and got a ferry permit and flew it home. He paid $25,000 for the bird. Last year I also met and talked to Col. Robert K. Hahn a mustang ace with 1500 hrs. in the P-51 including Korea. Favorite airplane? His 2500 hours in the T-Bird. Come to think of it, everyone I've ever met that flew the T-Bird in the military or civilian owned/and or got an LOA, puts it as their favorite aircraft.
Like bad DNA, the T-33 airframes carry a death sentence. No one can afford their 400 to 600gph. fuel burn. That's why you can pick one up for $100 grand licensed and flying. (1/3 of an L-39). Chris Rounds said if you "baby it" you can get the fuel burn down to 200gph. Does that mean going up to altitude, reducing the power to flight idle and gliding back to the airport?
My question; Can't anyone figure out a way to get rid of that allison J-33 obselete engine and fit something else in the fuselage to maintain performance and reduce fuel consumption by 1/2 to 2/3rd's ???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:18 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Been done, didn't sell!

http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypi/elevon/b ... kyfox.html

http://www.highgallery.com/military-air ... kyfox.html

Quote:
Costs
The operating and support costs of the Skyfox were less than that of the T-33 and could compete with the costs of the Hawk and the Alpha Jet. Structeral improvements, avionics upgrades, electrical rewiring, airframe and systems refurbishment, and powerplant modifications resulted in low cost, low maintenance hours and low spare parts consumption.
The two TFE371-3A turbofans that powered the Skyfox together weighted 17 per cent less than the single J33-A-35 turbojet of the T-33, while producing 60 per cent more thrust and consuming 45 per cent less fuel. The TFE371-3A turbofan had a ten-fold increase in time between overhauls (TBO) compared with the J33-A-35 turbojet. The result was a greatly improved maneuverability, range, endurance, payload and the added overwater and hostile terrain safety of the twin powerplant configuration.


http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNumSQL.asp?NNumbertxt=221SF

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 3:00 am
Posts: 114
Sure someone could. To do it properly you would need a engineer or two. For installation and areo effects of the intake. Then a complete flight test would have to be done. All very time consuming and expensive. So the person would spend a few million dollars to save money. In reality a person with that kind of money will just spend it on the gas and proven engine installation. Now your thinking he could get his investment back by selling the mod to others. That would bring with it huge liability. And a lawsuit for certain. Of course you could always do the "HEY WILBUR HAND ME THAT JET ENGINE" routine . But that is also sure to have problems. I dont know about anyone else but the last thing I ever want to read is another civilian jet thru the mall parking lot story. On the surface replacing the engine sounds like a good idea but its more complex than it sounds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:12 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4527
Location: Dallas, TX
As far as the been there done that pictures... That's one ugly bird. The T-33 is a pretty plane, but that is a monster.

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:22 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Whoa, Vanguard Whoa !!! That is the exact opposite of what I meant. Great photos and I'm familiar with the bird with the dual turbfans, etc. that was going to capture the counterinsugency market, just like the PA-48 Enforcer in the 1980's.
Remember the Temco TT-1 Pinto jet? Didn't some guys figure out how to replace its original 1,000 lbst engine with a learjet engine and fit it inside the fuselage? After all we're talking center of thrust would be about the same, and if anything a newer engine design would have to be lighter than that 1940's technology J-33 beast. Fuel- I bet most if not all of it is carried in the wings and tip tanks on the T-bird. Weight and balance? Remember the T-bird could carry 50 calibers in the nose so my guess is a CG shift could be accomodated easily.
Cost? A smoking hot aircraft and under the price of an L-39. Surplus sabreliner or Lear Jet engine or something along those lines. Heck they made the single engine T-2A Buckeye into a twin engine B and C model.
Look at all the engine changes in some of the unlimited racers. My thought is that the T-33 would still be an experimental aircraft, yes you are right it would cost millions to certify it in another category.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 2:04 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2148
Location: Utah
Not being a T-33 pilot myself all I can say is from the perspective of an observer. There is a gentleman with 2 canadair T-33s in Wendover. He swears by them and does not really have a lot of high regard for the American Allison engine - mostly a power issue I believe. Anyway, his argument - a bit tongue in cheek - is that when you buy an ex military jet you are only paying the price of admission - drinks and food are always more money :lol:

That skyfox N number is still registered to a Colorado company - wonder if it still gets out at all??

Tom P.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 2:34 pm 
Offline
Potato
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 3:21 am
Posts: 1068
Location: Out of the loop
That is one nice lookin ride!

Colorado eeehhhh?

I'm going to head out that way for a visit when a bud gets back from the stans, any idea what airport it might be at?


Orvis

_________________
DEEP THOUGHTS BY KIDS:
"If we could just get everyone to close their eyes and visualize world peace for an hour, imagine how serene and quiet it would be until the looting started. Age 15 "


Deep Thoughts,
Jack Handy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:22 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2148
Location: Utah
registery says "Flight Test Research Inc" in Englewood Co.

Tom P.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 4:50 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
pretty cool hybrid!! but to me the essence of owning a warbird is owning the original thing from a to z. no mods (other than maybe safety or govt regs etc) i'd want the real thing. fuel prices will continue to be an issue regardless if you are a warbirder, general aviation pilot, boater, what ever!! bottom line is we are all consumers, & fuel prices affect us all regardless of our income brackets. :?: :?: a looming question for the warbird community..... the day will eventually come when petroleum is rendered obsolete. then what??? tons of museums will start popping up with countless permanently grounded birds?? it will happen, maybe not in our generation, but frightening none the less!! :(

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:05 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Sounds to me like we need to start running these things on french fry oil (Biodiesel)! Plenty of that about as the nation gets fatter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 1:53 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
I talked to former Temco Pinto test pilot once. He told me that they tried to talk the old man ( his terminology ) at Temco into putting a CJ610 into it. He wouldn't here of it because it was supposed to be a trainer and the jets of the day were ground hogs. Much like the A model T-28s, same idea. He said they knew that airframe would come alive with a decent engine.

Mike Dillon did it with his, and made the wings wet for more capacity.


Last edited by RickH on Sun Mar 19, 2006 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:08 pm 
Offline
Aerial Pirate
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 11:46 pm
Posts: 2002
Location: South San Francisco, CA (next to SFO Airport)
Here's some short info on a Temco Pinto out here with replaced engines.
This link will only be good for a month or two. If you have trouble reading it, you need your picture browser set to 100% view. http://www.norcalaahs.org/hmbpinto.jpg

_________________
Roger Cain
www.sfahistory.org
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Stearman/


We must limit politicians to two terms:
one in office and one in jail.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ErrolC and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group