This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Re: Boeing Engineering

Sun Oct 18, 2020 2:24 am

Last two images.
Attachments
PSX_20201018_020250.jpg
PSX_20201018_020250.jpg (72.76 KiB) Viewed 609 times
PSX_20201018_020158.jpg
PSX_20201018_020158.jpg (75.68 KiB) Viewed 609 times

Re: Boeing Engineering

Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:30 am

Get out your calculator Tulio! ;-)

https://amesweb.info/Materials/Density_of_Aluminum.aspx

Re: Boeing Engineering

Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:52 am

JohnB wrote:Bdthe B-17 and B-29 used 24ST,the B-50 switched to 75ST, it's one of the major engineering differences between it and the '29.
Are you talking the skins, the extrusions, forgings, or what? I'm not sure your blanket statement is accurate, especially considering production changes.

From Wikipedia, "The first 7075 was developed in secret by a Japanese company, Sumitomo Metal, in 1935, but introduced by Alcoa in 1943 and was standardized for aerospace use in 1945. 7075 was eventually used for airframe production in the Imperial Japanese Navy." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7075_aluminium_alloy

Re: Boeing Engineering

Wed Oct 21, 2020 11:45 pm

Bdk...
I'm just quoting Boeing engineer/historian Peter M. Bowers in Boeing Aircraft since 1916, page 345 of the second edition.
He made quite a point about it with its weight savings, yet being substantially stronger. He was not specific which parts were involved. I assume the primary structure itself, not the skins.
Post a reply