Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jul 03, 2025 4:15 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Spitfire W+B
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 1:09 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:34 am
Posts: 1021
Anyone have acess to a W+B chart for a Spitfire? I'd like to know what the minimum weight on the tail would be to put the CG aft of the envelope.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: W&B
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 3:01 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
It of course varies with model and example, but The Spitfire V Manuel may be a good source. I will be back home Tue. to try to find more info. What model amd what engine do you have?

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 4:55 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:34 am
Posts: 1021
Actually some reseach for a possible TV show. Could a Spitfire take off with someone hanging off the tail ( right on top of the horizontal stabs let's say.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 11:57 pm
Posts: 223
Location: Planet Earth
Not only could they, but several actually did. At least two ground crew survived for a landing, and one (who was a WAAF) was alive until at least the 1980s. One (In Italy, IIRC) died when he fell off at height. :(

These were all 'pilot error'; the groundcrew were draped over the tail to provide weight for a Max power run up, but weren't able to hop off before the pilot took off.

The Battle of Britain Memorial Flight's Mk.II was the one that the WAAF flew on the tail of.

Discuss over on Flypast's Forum, and you'll get chapter and worse...

_________________
Raven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 6:35 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:34 am
Posts: 1021
I'm a bit surprised. That's quite a bit of weight on a long arm.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 6:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 1:49 am
Posts: 659
Actually it was AB910 the B of B flight Mark V that took the gal aloft on the tail. I've seen photos of another Spit with an 'erk' in flight on the tail as well.

A scary ride no doubt

Dan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: W & B
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 11:06 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
I never considered whether those stories about a passenger on the tail could be true from a physical standpoint. They are widely reported, but I'm not certain of the proof. Wasn't there a reported photo taken of the WAF from another plane in the pattern? Remember the max wt & balance would only come into play in slow flight near stall. If you had enough power and speed it would probably fly. A Spit has so much "flyability". The stall behavior is not only better than other fighters, but of most any plane. What I wonder was trying to hold on in a 150 mph slipstream!

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], junkman9096, phil65 and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group