Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Aug 18, 2025 3:21 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:33 pm
Posts: 912
Location: Beautiful Downtown Natick, MA
GSA Audit finds Navy storing $7.5 Billion in unneeded parts

( story from the Boston Globe) Date: 12/18/2008

Analysis fuels calls to reduce defense budget
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff

WASHINGTON - Government auditors identified at least $7.5 billion worth of unneeded spare parts stored in Navy warehouses yesterday, the latest example of wasteful military spending that is fueling calls for President-elect Barack Obama to take bold action to rein in the Defense Department's bloated budget.

Between 2003 and 2007, the Navy's supply of replacement parts for ships and aircraft far exceeded its needs, the Government Accountability Office found during a new audit. Indeed, in some instances investigators found stocks of equipment that the service is unlikely to use up for decades - such as 13,852 engine blades for its F/A-18 fighter jets estimated to be worth $3.6 million.

In total, the Navy has nearly 2 million more aircraft parts than its own projections deem necessary, while it is storing 10 million ship parts designated as excess, the report found. The cost of storing the equipment alone is $18 million, the GAO estimated.

"Based on Navy demand forecasts, inventory that exceeded current requirements was sufficient to satisfy several years, or even decades, of supply needs," according to the investigation, which was requested by Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent.

Several factors contributed to the unnecessary purchases, including inefficiency in the Navy's inventory management and a limited ability to accurately forecast equipment needs, congressional auditors said.

"As a result, the Navy had billions of dollars in excess inventory against current requirements each year," the GAO concluded, including some pieces of equipment that are still on order but already slated for disposal because they won't be needed.

Another example cited in the report was seven sonar sets for attack submarines that have been sitting in storage since 1991 and that the Navy never plans to use. And last year alone the Navy had 85,700 "unique items" in its spare parts inventory - valued at $1.9 billion - for which it had no projected demand.

Sanders, who sought the audit and cosponsored legislation earlier this year to create a special oversight board to root out wartime waste, called the findings "unbelievable and outrageous." He urged Obama to take action next year to safeguard taxpayer funds.

"At a time when the nation has a $10.6 trillion debt, we simply cannot afford the continuing uncontrollable waste across the federal agencies," Sanders, a member of the Senate Budget Committee, said in a written statement.

He added: "Unfortunately, this is not just the Navy, but something the entire military has to address. I hope the next administration will take the issue seriously."

Obama has said he will make cutting wasteful government spending a top priority.

Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, whom Obama has asked to stay on indefinitely, has also sent clear signals in recent weeks that he, too, is committed to taking the axe to Pentagon programs he deems unnecessary.

In the meantime, the Pentagon, which concurred with the report's recommendations for improving supply chain management, pledged to take action.

The findings come as the Commission of Wartime Contracting, established by Congress this year to investigate waste, fraud, and abuse in Pentagon purchasing, prepares to hold its first public hearing in February.

But Sanders, in a telephone interview yesterday from Vermont, said far more needs to be done, vowing to author legislation to make it illegal for the military to spend appropriations on spare parts it cannot justify.

"We have been talking about this issue of unused and unneeded spare parts for many years," Sanders told the Globe. "We need legislation to make sure the Pentagon is not wasting billions of dollars."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:06 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
I hear that the POF and Yanks Air Museum are looking for F-14 parts...... :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:35 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 8:51 pm
Posts: 1068
Location: Illinois, USA
(My pet peeve):
Lake Michigan has a lot of spare parts that the Navy will not use in the foreseeable future.
VL


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:40 pm 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:58 am
Posts: 1054
Location: In Your Screen
Mine too, hey maybe Carl Levin can help..yeah right..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:33 pm
Posts: 912
Location: Beautiful Downtown Natick, MA
Excuse me A2C...

What specifically did Carl Levin have to do with this?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:19 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
This is what happens when you have MBAs trying to run the military.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:33 pm
Posts: 912
Location: Beautiful Downtown Natick, MA
Or is it...

When you have the military run the MBA's?

:wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:41 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Carl Levin is the Senate Armed Services Chairman. He is on record of being very antigun, he and his senior counsel Mr.Levine were very prodemil legislation that we were talking about on another thread. They would rather demil ( destroy most of those parts than run them through the system ) the parts. When they need them and go to the surplus community to buy them back they won't be there.

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:01 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11330
I hope they spend just as much time rooting out waste from social programs. But I doubt they will.... :x

Don't they call government waste a stimulus package now? :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:12 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
:shock: well.... in this economy i'd say it's to ebay, or a huge garage sale at the white house

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:49 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
For the most part, I don't really understand why someone has his/her briefs in a bunch over this. Much of the "excess" stuff has little or no civilian use (example - spare sonar units), so it isn't like Uncle Sam can sell it and recoup the expense.

Sure, there are storage costs, but my guess is that they still find a use (or need) for stuff from the "we don't really need it list".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:34 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Kyleb, it's not about the sonar units. The majority of this equipment does have acivilian application. Have you ever been to a DRMO ?

As far as the sonar units go, have you ever been fishing in the Gulf of Mexico and almost run over a submarine ? :lol:

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:33 pm
Posts: 912
Location: Beautiful Downtown Natick, MA
My issue is with the waste...as one example in the report:

"In total, the Navy has nearly 2 million more aircraft parts than its own projections deem necessary, while it is storing 10 million ship parts designated as excess, the report found."

Please read the report, or at least the article about it...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:17 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
when i'm ready for bed i'll read it........ zzzzzzzzz snore....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz......snore. that report probably deforested 10,000 trees. but were going green :mrgreen: remember??

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:23 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 8:54 pm
Posts: 1388
Location: Beautiful, Downtown Danvers, MA
bdk wrote:

Don't they call government waste a stimulus package now? :roll:


That's all I could think of when I was reading the article, now I need to stimulate my economy and finish posting some classified ads for my excess VW parts.

Wouldnt it be funny if there was a Craigslist.gov? :shock:

_________________
"Hindsight is usually 20% off!"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group