Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Mar 12, 2026 6:23 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:12 pm
Posts: 4
Location: KCMO
Just curious about what differences there are between the Packard built Merlins and the RR Merlins. Just an engineer's curiosity (as there's minimal chance I'd ever be able to afford anything with this powerplant). One thing that has always got my curiosity was the choice of bolts/nuts/fasteners. Obviously we in the US use SAE type bolts/threads, but it's my impression that the British had their own bolt specs (the bolt type name escapes me at the moment). I was wondering if Packard converted their tooling to use the same fastener configuration as the British, or if Packard engines used SAE bolts in their construction.

I've searched around on the web for information, but have struck out so far.

Thanks for any info.
Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:26 am
Posts: 15
Location: East Anglia, UK
The Hangar 11 Team in the UK have just back-engined their Spitfire PR XI (PL965) from a Packard Merlin 266 to a RR Merlin 70 as originally fitted. A recent magazine article mentions the main differences being in the engine ancilliaries. Packard apparently made several mods to the engine to ease the manufacturing process and produce greater reliability. An example given is that Packard simplified the blower assembly, removing the separate 'kettle' tank which housed the intercooler coolant resevoir and made it integral with the intercooler matrix housing. All this had to be reverse engineered when retro fitting the Merlin 70.

Regret they didn't mention the bolts!

:spit


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:56 pm
Posts: 138
P-38 fan wrote:
Just curious about what differences there are between the Packard built Merlins and the RR Merlins. Just an engineer's curiosity (as there's minimal chance I'd ever be able to afford anything with this powerplant). One thing that has always got my curiosity was the choice of bolts/nuts/fasteners. Obviously we in the US use SAE type bolts/threads, but it's my impression that the British had their own bolt specs (the bolt type name escapes me at the moment). I was wondering if Packard converted their tooling to use the same fastener configuration as the British, or if Packard engines used SAE bolts in their construction.

I've searched around on the web for information, but have struck out so far.

Thanks for any info.
Mike


The Packard build units used BS just like the RR units.

John
CC Red Tail


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 3:57 am
Posts: 926
Red Tail wrote:
P-38 fan wrote:
Just curious about what differences there are between the Packard built Merlins and the RR Merlins. Just an engineer's curiosity (as there's minimal chance I'd ever be able to afford anything with this powerplant). One thing that has always got my curiosity was the choice of bolts/nuts/fasteners. Obviously we in the US use SAE type bolts/threads, but it's my impression that the British had their own bolt specs (the bolt type name escapes me at the moment). I was wondering if Packard converted their tooling to use the same fastener configuration as the British, or if Packard engines used SAE bolts in their construction.

I've searched around on the web for information, but have struck out so far.

Thanks for any info.
Mike


The Packard build units used BS just like the RR units.

John
CC Red Tail

The brit fasteners are known as "Whitworth,Wentworth? used to have a full set of wrenches,Taps and Dies for repairing old Brit cars.

_________________
"WHAT ME WORRY?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 3:57 am
Posts: 926
I'm thinking the quality of the US metalurgy might have been better. its easier to smelt high quality metals when you dont have bombs dropping through your foundry roof and dont have to rely on ship loads of raw material.

_________________
"WHAT ME WORRY?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:52 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
P-38 fan wrote:
Just curious about what differences there are between the Packard built Merlins and the RR Merlins. Just an engineer's curiosity (as there's minimal chance I'd ever be able to afford anything with this powerplant). One thing that has always got my curiosity was the choice of bolts/nuts/fasteners. Obviously we in the US use SAE type bolts/threads, but it's my impression that the British had their own bolt specs (the bolt type name escapes me at the moment). I was wondering if Packard converted their tooling to use the same fastener configuration as the British, or if Packard engines used SAE bolts in their construction.

I've searched around on the web for information, but have struck out so far.

Thanks for any info.
Mike

Its a loaded question.
RR design evolved over time so even within RR produced examples there are many changes.
The Brits use a different spline on their prop hubs so a US Prop uses SAE 50 or 60 Spline design. So US and RR engines have different Prop Shafts.
Early Merlins used a Float Type Carb, Americans used a Bendix Pressure carb, Later RR used a version of a Pressure Carb but called it Fuel Injection. So on an American Packard you had an adapter for a US Fuel pump.
The front of the nose under the prop shaft had a V drive. On american versions on the left side was the prop gov, american made, and on the right was a vacuum pump for the instruments and to pressurize fuel tanks. The Brits had Vacuum pumps that were a copy pretty much of the American pumps. Unsure if the base is any different or the drive interface. I really don't know what Prop Gov was used on the RR engines. Much later RR engines had a different gov setup.
About the only thing with SAE threads on Packard engines is the Cuno oil filter on the R/H side by the oil regulator and on a couple of the adapters to American accessories.
Packard engineered some improvements, RR used some.
I believe US paid RR $5k an engine in royalty costs. With the P-82 that is why they went with GM after the war ended. At least one reason.

_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:05 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
agent86 wrote:
Red Tail wrote:
P-38 fan wrote:
Just curious about what differences there are between the Packard built Merlins and the RR Merlins. Just an engineer's curiosity (as there's minimal chance I'd ever be able to afford anything with this powerplant). One thing that has always got my curiosity was the choice of bolts/nuts/fasteners. Obviously we in the US use SAE type bolts/threads, but it's my impression that the British had their own bolt specs (the bolt type name escapes me at the moment). I was wondering if Packard converted their tooling to use the same fastener configuration as the British, or if Packard engines used SAE bolts in their construction.

I've searched around on the web for information, but have struck out so far.

Thanks for any info.
Mike


The Packard build units used BS just like the RR units.

John
CC Red Tail

The brit fasteners are known as "Whitworth,Wentworth? used to have a full set of wrenches,Taps and Dies for repairing old Brit cars.


Actually there are several types of British fastener types. I have wrenches with BA, BS and Wentworth. There is also British Pipe Threads so there is more than just Wentworth.
I forget all the in and outs but BS is British Standard. Wentworth is Wentworth. And BA is just out of reach at the moment.
Differences have to do with thread angle and pitch, ect.
A 2 BA is a 10-32 but with a different angle on the threads.
I remember Frank Sanders using a 10-32 tap on the nutplates for the wing fairings on their 2 seat Seafury way back when so he would install American Screws.

_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:14 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
WOW...Keep it up troops. This is why WIX is what it is.

Mudge the educable :D

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 10:22 am
Posts: 645
Location: VA, USA
I read in one of the Ian Allen "Lancaster At War" volumes that each Packard Merlin was crated at the factory with it's own set of very nice tools for servicing the engine.

One of the British aircraft mechanics wrote that they were often short on good tools, so there was a heated competition to be the first one to get to the US tool sets to claim them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 3:57 am
Posts: 926
My experience with crazy Brit fastners is limited to Whitworth. They have their own Thread pitch,angle and the bolt heads are close,not quite close enough to substitute SAE wrenches.some will ,most wont. Had a Set as I said of ancient wrences taps and dies. used to charge other shops to borrow the set,so they could restore or repair old Brit cars.someone finally stole it from me

_________________
"WHAT ME WORRY?"


Last edited by agent86 on Sat Jun 18, 2011 3:32 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:56 pm
Posts: 138
This page is full of handy reference material I refer to often. http://www.britishfasteners.com/threads/index.html

John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:49 pm
Posts: 560
agent86 wrote:
My experience with crazy Brit fastners is limited to Wentworth. They have their own Thread pitch,angle and the bolt heads are close,not quite close enough to substitute SAE wrenches.some will ,most wont. Had a Set as I said of ancient wrences taps and dies. used to charge other shops to borrow the set,so they could restore or repair old Brit cars.someone finally stole it from me

Actually it is not Wentworth it is Whitworth,incidently they were the first to standardise thread size, allowing for interchangeable nuts and bolts,prior to this all threads were nonstandard,so Whitworth opened the door to mass production worldwide.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:37 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1142
Location: Caribou, Maine
I will bet that the RR-powered units had better hood ornaments.

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:12 pm
Posts: 4
Location: KCMO
old iron wrote:
I will bet that the RR-powered units had better hood ornaments.


Well, that goes without saying. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:48 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Agent 86,

if British fasteners drive you nuts, by all means donot decide to restore an International Harvester of any kind, whether a 'tater torquer or pickup as they had their own, unique bolt sizes and thread pitches too, it kept the farmers coming back into the dealership instead of going to 'FREDS HARDWARE' and generated repeat business, but now that binder is long gone, you'd have to go to a specialty bolt and screw store to get direct replacements.

And try working on a MERLIN sitting in a cradle on a finger pier @ a lakeside race site like Detroit or Guntersville and your boat is in the next heat.

P.S. don't take on a VINCENT BLACK SHADOW motorcycle either :shock:

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: David Legg, Google Adsense [Bot] and 261 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group