Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 3:13 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 5:23 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7819
Fueling one up to go ...

The Northrop YB-49 was a prototype jet-powered heavy bomber developed by Northrop Corporation shortly after World War II for service with the U.S. Air Force. The YB-49 featured a flying wing design and was a turbojet-powered development of the earlier, piston-engined Northrop XB-35 and YB-35. The two YB-49s actually built were both converted YB-35 test aircraft. The YB-49 never entered production, being passed over in favor of the more conventional Convair B-36 piston-driven design.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_YB-49

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
Zero Surprise!!...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 5:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2020 3:45 pm
Posts: 38
Beautiful bird. :supz:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:38 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:15 pm
Posts: 1399
Location: San Diego CA
Too bad that not a single one was preserved


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 8:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 3:37 pm
Posts: 672
Jesse C. wrote:
Too bad that not a single one was preserved


AF Secretary Stuart Symington was so vindictive from Northrop refusing to merge with Convair that he had all of the YB-49s scrapped in full view of Northrop employees. Blueprints were destroyed also. I think Symington later took a nice comfy job with Convair.

_________________
"They done it, they done it, damned if they ain't flew." December 17, 1903


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 10:58 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
You know, Convair had the incredible B-36. Maybe if they had merged they would’ve designed something even better that Boeing’s B-52.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:21 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5748
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
Nice photos Mark, thanks.

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 11:37 pm
Posts: 420
Location: Los Angeles, CA
DoraNineFan wrote:
Jesse C. wrote:
Too bad that not a single one was preserved


AF Secretary Stuart Symington was so vindictive from Northrop refusing to merge with Convair that he had all of the YB-49s scrapped in full view of Northrop employees. Blueprints were destroyed also. I think Symington later took a nice comfy job with Convair.


Symington knew he was going to Convair before he left the AF Secretary position. He wanted Northrop to merge because Symington was convinced it was the better bomber and wanted Convair to have it. Northrop told him "no way" and then Symington did his corrupt -vindictive scrapping of all the vestiges of Northrop's work. Northrop never opened his mouth about it until 1978. Ironically, the Air Force did come around to the conclusion it was the better bomber- perhaps a more modern version was safer and fly by wire didn't really exist in 1949. Jack told me this (YB 49) "the plane was never designed for jet engines but it was now what the Air Force wanted and so we made it work". The propellers had some vibration issues and he still felt it was the more long range bomber that the Air Force needed, but the jet age called for a jet. The Air Force unveiled a painting of the new Northrop flying Wing B-2 at Northrop University to show Jack that his dream will become a reality. I was his neighbor and his grand daughter Janet was my best friend. I Elder sat many hours with Jack to make sure he didn't fall down. Planes were always part of the discussion, the politics he avoided. He hated the business side of planes. Loved the creation part.

_________________
Better is the enemy of Good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 2:44 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
Adam Kline wrote:
DoraNineFan wrote:
Jesse C. wrote:
Too bad that not a single one was preserved


AF Secretary Stuart Symington was so vindictive from Northrop refusing to merge with Convair that he had all of the YB-49s scrapped in full view of Northrop employees. Blueprints were destroyed also. I think Symington later took a nice comfy job with Convair.


Symington knew he was going to Convair before he left the AF Secretary position. He wanted Northrop to merge because Symington was convinced it was the better bomber and wanted Convair to have it. Northrop told him "no way" and then Symington did his corrupt -vindictive scrapping of all the vestiges of Northrop's work. Northrop never opened his mouth about it until 1978. Ironically, the Air Force did come around to the conclusion it was the better bomber- perhaps a more modern version was safer and fly by wire didn't really exist in 1949. Jack told me this (YB 49) "the plane was never designed for jet engines but it was now what the Air Force wanted and so we made it work". The propellers had some vibration issues and he still felt it was the more long range bomber that the Air Force needed, but the jet age called for a jet. The Air Force unveiled a painting of the new Northrop flying Wing B-2 at Northrop University to show Jack that his dream will become a reality. I was his neighbor and his grand daughter Janet was my best friend. I Elder sat many hours with Jack to make sure he didn't fall down. Planes were always part of the discussion, the politics he avoided. He hated the business side of planes. Loved the creation part.


Neither the B-35 or B-49 did the mission as well as the competitors. The B-36 carried a lot more a lot farther than both and the B-47 had much higher performance than either. That's why the B-35 and B-49 went by the wayside, not some conspiracy.

Beyond that, if the flying wing was a great concept, someone would have used it in a normal application. The only reason flying wings are in use today is stealth. The negatives of a flying wing outweigh their advantages in non-stealth applications.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:44 pm
Posts: 255
Kyleb wrote:


Neither the B-35 or B-49 did the mission as well as the competitors. The B-36 carried a lot more a lot farther than both and the B-47 had much higher performance than either. That's why the B-35 and B-49 went by the wayside, not some conspiracy.

Beyond that, if the flying wing was a great concept, someone would have used it in a normal application. The only reason flying wings are in use today is stealth. The negatives of a flying wing outweigh their advantages in non-stealth applications.


I'm curious how the projected blended wing airliners concept will pan out. Probably efficient but a lot of air sickness without outside visual clues.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:21 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
junkman9096 wrote:

I'm curious how the projected blended wing airliners concept will pan out. Probably efficient but a lot of air sickness without outside visual clues.


Apologies for moving farther off-topic, but the big challenge for flying wings is pitch stability. One of the reasons conventional airliners have long fuselages is to put the empennage way back there so a little elevator or trim tab movement will have a big impact. With flying wings, that moment arm is much smaller and requires a lot more trim surface or control surface movement to achieve the same amount of pitch trim. This is important both from a CG perspective where you want a wide allowable CG range and from the ability to trim the aircraft to a certain speed.

So, if the BWB aircraft is relatively short nose to tail, it'll suffer the same compromises as flying wings, planks, and the like.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:04 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:11 am
Posts: 2391
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Now those are nice! Like the first close up's

Mark, anything on the the XB-35? I'm a prop nut...

Tks and cheers!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:59 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
A couple of the pictures in this thread (particularly the last one) make it look like the B-49 was painted blue over grey. (It wasn't) Just interesting how you can be fooled by black and white film and reflections off of aluminum.

But navy blue over grey or natural aluminum would have been a beautiful scheme.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:46 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:11 am
Posts: 2391
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Found a few XB-35 pics. To the left & the right....

Is it just me or it looks like H Hughes???? in the first pic!
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 7:57 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
Way back in Ye Oulden Days of the internet, shortly after AMT put out their YB-35 and XB-49 models, the folks at alt.history.what-if did a comprehensive alternate history timeline of the B-49 in service through Vietnam to the Gulf War.
There were some impressive models built in SEA camo with external hardpoints and all sorts of antennae and other greeblies.

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Northrop YB-49 ...
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 8:57 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:26 pm
Posts: 2051
Location: Creemore Ontario Canada
Adam Kline wrote:

Symington knew he was going to Convair before he left the AF Secretary position. He wanted Northrop to merge because Symington was convinced it was the better bomber and wanted Convair to have it. Northrop told him "no way" and then Symington did his corrupt -vindictive scrapping of all the vestiges of Northrop's work. Northrop never opened his mouth about it until 1978. Ironically, the Air Force did come around to the conclusion it was the better bomber- perhaps a more modern version was safer and fly by wire didn't really exist in 1949. Jack told me this (YB 49) "the plane was never designed for jet engines but it was now what the Air Force wanted and so we made it work". The propellers had some vibration issues and he still felt it was the more long range bomber that the Air Force needed, but the jet age called for a jet. The Air Force unveiled a painting of the new Northrop flying Wing B-2 at Northrop University to show Jack that his dream will become a reality. I was his neighbor and his grand daughter Janet was my best friend. I Elder sat many hours with Jack to make sure he didn't fall down. Planes were always part of the discussion, the politics he avoided. He hated the business side of planes. Loved the creation part.

Really interesting connection Adam.
I recall a show (I think it was 60 minutes, or something of the like) where it was described that Jack was given a one time special security clearance so that he could be shown the B2 then under development.
Now that I think about it, he probably wouldn't have been able to talk about it.
A pretty cool gesture of respect.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], mike furline and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group