the330thbg wrote:
HARUMPH

The above two examples from the Lexington are a
JOKE.Plain(plane) and simple.
HAH.., what a JOKE!Embarassing, ridiculous and just plain disrespectful.
This halfmule job on these two birds was not due to a lack of funding. It was do to a lack of oversite. That points to management. They don't give a sugar about what they display. So i won't give a crap about supporting them.
The ONLY excuse for what they did to these birds was that they did not care.
If no one else on this board can see it, then I have to agree with the above post 'all hands on deck' that all the good ones have obviously left.
I am joining them as well. No disrespect to the great ones that have turned 'lurkers'.
Make room in the pool.

Dude, get a hobby.... A different one. Maybe not a hobby that you're all bent out of shape or nearly as anal about something being off-color by a shade or two. At this point it is my opinion that you are being completely disrespectful to the men and woman who served aboard that historic ship, and the men and woman in the Navy, and I take personal offense to this. Running a ship that size requires manpower and funding that deliberately or not deliberately requires paint that may be off. I chipped paint on a certain battleship to remove an off-white color to return it to the sugar green that it was supposed to be. That decision was made before I was born to paint it that color. I would never insult the ship, nor the folks who work on it, for it not being historically accurate. Who the hell am I to say that? If that's all you see, then you are failing to see the museum for what it's worth, and pressing this issue is just beyond retarded.
I will no longer comment further on this thread as clearly your agenda is to trash the way they are running the ship, no pun intended.
I'd like to see you go tell a warbird owner that his paint scheme is not authentic.